
 
the students have known. The concrete things known 
by  the  students  are  the  knowledge  bridges  to 
understand  the  math  abstractness.  The  knowledge 
bridge that is meant is by implementing the media of 
ethno-mathematics. 
It  is  in  line  with  D’Ambrosio’s  point  of  view 
(1985) in Hardiarti that on the other hand, there is a 
reasonable  amount  of  literature  on  this  by 
anthropologists  (Hardiarti,  2017).  Making  a  bridge 
between  anthropologists  and  historians  of  culture 
and  mathematicians  is  an  important  step  towards 
recognizing  that  different  modes  of  thoughts  may 
lead  to  different  forms  of  mathematics;  this  is  the 
field which we may call ethnomathematics. It means 
that creating a  bridge between culture  and  math  is 
necessary  step  to  recognize  various  thinking  ways 
that  can  create  mathematical  forms;  it  is  what  is 
called  as  ethno-mathematics.  It  can  be  interpreted 
that  various  concept  of  math  can  be  explored  and 
found in the culture so that it clarifies that the math 
and the culture are interrelated; math can be created 
from the culture,  and  math  can  be  explored  in  the 
culture  so  that  it  can  be  used  as  one  of  concrete 
learning sources existed around the students. It is in 
line with (Wahyuni, 2016), (Fajriyah, 2018), (Putri, 
2017), (Hardiarti, 2017) and (Maryati & Prahmana, 
2018)  in  general  said  that  mathematics  should  be 
associated with daily life based on local culture.  
One of the historical objects that can be used as 
learning media is the relic of historical object in Fort 
Ujung  Pandang  or  more  known  as  Fort  Rotterdam 
located  in  the  center  of  Makassar  city.  Fort 
Rotterdam is one of the legacies of Gowa kingdom 
and has a lot of relics of historical objects. Some of 
buildings  and  historical  objects  at  Fort  Rotterdam 
seem  have  similarity  with  the  math  concepts 
especially  geometry  material.  The  learning  sources 
derived from those historical objects can be used to 
introduce forms of shapes and surface area. Marsigit 
et al. (2018) state that ethno-mathematics serves to 
express  the  relation  between  the  culture  and  the 
math.  Therefore,  ethno-mathematics  is  a  science 
used to understand how the math is adapted from a 
culture. 
Through  math  learning  resources  derived  from 
the  socio-cultural  environment,  it  is  expected  to 
facilitate  students  in  understanding  the  basic 
concepts of math because the learning process that is 
carried out starts from informal math knowledge as 
well  as  to  develop  the  students’  insight  on  the 
culture diversity that they have especially the local 
culture. The math learning based ethno-mathematics 
is one of  alternatives  that  can  make  learning  more 
meaningful, contextual, interesting, and fun.  it is in 
line  with  Putri’s  explanation  (2017)  in  her research 
that the exploration on the cultural studies related to 
the math is able to give new information about local 
culture  diversity  and  it  is  easier  to  understand  the 
math learning because it is not perceived as an ‘odd’ 
thing by the students anymore. 
Based  on  the  above  descriptions,  it  can  be 
concluded  that  this  study  aims  to  explore  and 
describe  the  geometrical  concepts  found  in  the 
historical  objects  at  Fort  Rotterdam  and  how  to 
utilize the math concepts in math learning on those 
historical objects at Fort Rotterdam. 
2  METHOD 
The  study  used  qualitative  research  with 
ethnographic  approach.  Ethnographic  research  is 
also often referred to as field research. According to 
Lawrence Neuman, ethnography is the extension of 
field  research.  Meanwhile,  according  to  Roice 
Singleton,  ethnography  provides  answers  to  the 
question on what the culture of an individual group 
is. The qualitative research is used by the researcher 
in  order  to  be  directly  involved  in  getting  what 
information needs to be known.  
The  research  instrument  in  the  qualitative 
research  with  ethnography  approach  is  the 
researcher himself/herself (human instrument) which 
means  that  the  researcher  acts  as  the  main 
instrument  that  cannot  be  replaced  by  others.  The 
role  as  the  main  instrument  is  setting  the  research 
focus,  selecting  the  informants  as  data  sources, 
collecting library data, interviewing, observing, and 
documenting.  
Data  analysis  techniques  were  carried  out  by 
changing the data obtained from both the informants 
and those obtained by the researcher in the form of 
recordings  or  images  into  writing  or  report  by 
selecting which data needed in the study. 
 
 
 
 
ICMIs 2018 - International Conference on Mathematics and Islam
152