Performance Analysis of Zakat Intitutions by using NZI and DEA in
Jabodetabek, Indonesia
Nadita Tri Hastutik, M. Soleh Nurzaman
Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Indonesia , Jl. Prof. Dr. Sumitro Djojohadikusumo, Kukusan, Beji, Depok,
Jawa Barat,Indonesia
Keywords: Zakat, Performance, Zakat Institutions, National Zakat Index (NZI), Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)
Abstract: Zakat is one of the five pillars of Islam. Zakat has vertical and horizontal relationships where vertical
relationship to Allah SWT and horizontal relationship that serves as the distribution of wealth and income.
Indonesia is a country with the largest number of Muslims in the world so the potential of ZIS Indonesia is
very large. Zakat institution has an important role in zakat management. This study discusses the
performance of zakat institutions by conducting an analysis based on the National Zakat Index (NZI) and
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in BAZIS DKI Jakarta and BAZNAS Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, and
Bekasi. This study aims to analyze the performance of BAZNAS and BAZIS in Jabodetabek by using NZI
and DEA and to know graph of performance deployment of zakat institutions with both methods. Result
from this study shows that 0.761 is the average performance of zakat institutions by using NZI with good
category in 2017, while the performance by using DEA is 0.752 in 2017. On the other hand, graph of
performance deployment of zakat institutions shows that the majority of zakat institutions are in quadrant 1.
1 INTRODUCTION
Zakat is a form of obligatory worship to Allah
SWT. Zakat is part of the third pillar of Islam. That
is, zakat is one of the main pillars of the teachings of
Islam. Zakat is not only promoting justice,
accountability and compassion in society, but also as
a means to preserve social equilibrium in a country
by helping the poor and needy to pursue a better life
(Abdullah & Sapiei, 2018; Khurshid et al., 2014).
From an economic perspective, zakat is one of
the instruments of Islam that functions as a
distribution of income and wealth. Zakat has been
used to mitigate poverty from the days of Prophet
Muhammad, as ordained by God (Ahmed & Md
Salleh, 2016). In a hadith narrated by Imam al-
Ashanani from the Faith at-Thabrani, the Messenger
of Allah said that means:
"Verily Allah SWT has obliged the Muslim
businessmen to fulfill the obligation of zakat which
can overcome poverty. It is not possible for a
devotee to suffer from hunger or lack of clothing,
except because of the inherent mischief in Muslim
journalists. Remember, Allah SWT will do careful
calculations and hold them accountable and will
further torture them with painful punishment".
Indonesia is the country with the largest number
of Muslims in the World. Indonesian Muslim
population reaches 85% or around 216 million of the
total population of Indonesia (Central Bureau of
Statistics, 2015). This resulted in the potential of
zakat in Indonesia is very large and is one solution
to overcome the problem of poverty and inequality
in Indonesia. Moreover, the problem of poverty and
inequality is still a major problem in Indonesia.
Table 1 shows that the growth of Zakat, Infaq,
and Shadaqah/Alms (ZIS) continued to increase
from 2007 to 2016. The data is the result of reports
by various of zakat institutions in Indonesia,
including The National Board of Zakat in Indonesia
(BAZNAS), BAZNAS Province, BAZNAS
Regency/City, Amil Zakat Institution (LAZ), LAZ
Province, and LAZ Regency/City which report
collection data to BAZNAS officially in accordance
with Law 23/2011. The increase occurred in line
with improvements in regulation, coordination, and
management of the zakat institutions. According to
Wibisono (2015), the extent of the zakat institutions
network, both LAZ and BAZNAS, became the main
force that led to the rising trend of ZIS collection in
Indonesia. The extent of the zakat institutions
network can facilitate the public in paying ZIS so
Tri Hastutik, N. and Nurzaman, M.
Performance Analysis of Zakat Intitutions in Indonesia by using NZI and DEA in Jabodetabek, Indonesia.
DOI: 10.5220/0008437100850094
In Proceedings of the 4th Sriwijaya Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference (SEABC 2018), pages 85-94
ISBN: 978-989-758-387-2
Copyright
c
2019 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
85
that it helps the government in collecting ZIS funds
nationally.
Table 1: ZIS Collection in Indonesia in 2007-2016 (Billion
Rupiah)
Year
ZIS Collection
Growth (%)
2007
740
-
2008
920
24.32
2009
1200
30.43
2010
1500
25.00
2011
1729
15.30
2012
2200
27.24
2013
2700
22.73
2014
3300
22.22
2015
3700
21.21
2016
5017
26.25
Source: National Board of Zakat (BAZNAS)
Although the growth of zakat in Indonesia has
increased every year. But there is a gap between the
potential of zakat and zakat collection in Indonesia.
Zakat potential in Indonesia reaches Rp. 217 Trillion
(Indonesia Zakat Outlook, 2018). But in 2017, the
collection of national ZIS collected by BAZNAS
and LAZ reached Rp. 6 Trillion or only 2.76 percent
of the total potential. There are several causes of this
gap, one of the causes is the low awareness of
compulsory zakat (muzakki) and the low trust in
paying zakat to formal institutions (Indonesia Zakat
Outlook 2017). Therefore, public trust in zakat
institutions has an important role in collecting zakat
by zakat institutions. So the standardized
performance of zakat institutions is needed so that
zakat institutions can be more professional and can
increase public awareness and trust to pay zakat
formally.
Zakat institutions has a very important role for
the performance of zakat in general. Zakat
institutions has an obligation to ensure and convince
the public that zakat institutions does not only raise
funds and distribute in accordance with sharia
principles but zakat institutions must be professional
and efficient (Noor, Rasool, Yusof, & Ali, 2012).
Zakat institutions can also provide socio-economic
impacts and make zakat a productive economic
source and provide long-term effects on Mustahik
(recipients of zakat). According to Yusuf al-
Qaradawi (1973), the role of Amil (zakat officer) is
equated to the heart in the human body, if the heart
is good, the human body is also good, if the heart
hurts, all parts of the body will deteriorate. So that
the role of Amil is very strategic and decisive in the
rise of zakat. In managing ZIS funds, the role of
Amil is very important because Amil carries out the
mandate to manage the funds to be distributed to
Mustahik. Zakat funds that have been collected must
be managed appropriately in order to achieve
optimal efficiency and productivity (Noor, Rasool,
Yusof, & Ali, 2012).
In the Al-Quran, Amil occupies the third position
after the poor and poor as parties who receive zakat
funds. This indicates that zakat is not an assignment
given to someone but also a state duty (al-
Qaradhawi, 1999)). The state is obliged to regulate
and appoint people who work to manage zakat,
consisting of collectors, storage, writers, counters
and so on. History says that one of the reasons for
the fall of the Umayyad Dynasty was the failure of
the government to manage Baitulmal (M., 1991).
Therefore, the government is obliged to provide
facilities and infrastructure in managing zakat both
nationally and district/city level.
BAZNAS as a non-structural government agency
that is authorized to manage zakat nationally, is
independent and responsible to the President through
the Minister of Religious Affairs. In addition to the
national level, BAZNAS also manages ZIS at the
provincial and district/city level. But within the
scope of the national capital of Indonesia, DKI
Jakarta, the government agency that manages ZIS
funds in Jakarta is Badan Amil Zakat, Infaq and
Shadaqah (BAZIS). BAZIS DKI Jakarta is
equivalent to BAZNAS at the provincial level but
structurally BAZIS DKI Jakarta is independent and
separated from BAZNAS. In addition to managing
ZIS at the provincial level, BAZIS also manages ZIS
at the City and District levels. The establishment of
a government institution in charge of managing ZIS
is proof that the Indonesian government has
regulated and provided institutions that manage
zakat from the district to the national level.
BAZIS DKI Jakarta is a non-structural
government agency owned by the DKI Jakarta’s
government which also has a substantial acquisition
of ZIS. In 2016, Jakarta ZIS collection reached
154.01 billion rupiahs. The latest data shows that
BAZIS DKI Jakarta has ZIS collected amounting to
191.25 billion rupiahs in 2017 and targets a ZIS
collection of 300 billion rupiahs in 2018 (BAZIS
DKI Jakarta, 2018).
Within the scope of the capital city of Indonesia,
DKI Jakarta can collect a sizeable of ZIS funds. The
sizeable collection in the capital city reflects the
progress of zakat management in Indonesia. In
addition to the scope of the capital, Bogor, Depok,
Tangerang and Bekasi as cities that closest to the
capital also continued to increasing the collected of
ZIS funds from year on year. BAZNAS Bogor in
2014 managed to raise ZIS funds from 3.4 billion
SEABC 2018 - 4th Sriwijaya Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference
86
rupiahs while in 2017 managed to raise ZIS funds by
5.6 billion rupiahs, an increase of 64.7% (BAZNAS
Bogor, 2017). BAZNAS Tangerang has a substantial
ZIS growth of 222% from 775 million rupiahs in
2012 to 2.5 billion rupiahs in 2016 (BAZNAS
Tangerang, 2016). Meanwhile, BAZNAS Bekasi has
a higher collection compared to BAZNAS Kota
Depok, Bogor and Tangerang which is equal to 10.1
billion rupiahs in 2017 with a growth of 15%
compared to the previous year. On the other hand,
BAZNAS Depok has only been established at the
end of 2016 so that ZIS collection tends to be lower
compared to BAZNAS Bogor, Bekasi, and
Tangerang. But over time, the collection of ZIS in
Depok can increase considering the economic
development in Depok is increasingly rapid
(Ardianto, 2018).
Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, and Bekasi
(Jabodetabek) are metropolitan with a population of
30 million (Dardak, 2014). With a large population
and tends to increase every year, the potential for
ZIS in Jabodetabek is very large. BAZNAS at the
district /city level and BAZIS DKI Jakarta only
manage zakat in their respective regions so that there
is a focus in managing ZIS funds and helping local
governments to improve community welfare through
the programs they run. Therefore, zakat management
must be carried out efficiently and professionally. So
the authors feel it is important to conduct research
on zakat institutions performance, especially
BAZNAS and BAZIS DKI Jakarta at district/city
level as non-structural government institutions.
The object of this research is BAZNAS Depok,
Tangerang, Bogor, Bekasi and BAZIS
Administration of North, South, East, West and
Central Jakarta. The research object covers the
Jabodetabek area . Jabodetabek is an area that is
more advanced than other regions throughout
Indonesia so that it can be used as a national
representation. Performance measurement by using
institutional indicators of NZI (National Zakat
Index) and DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) in
BAZNAS Depok, Tangerang, Bogor, Bekasi and
BAZIS DKI Jakarta has never been studied so this
research can fill the gap from previous research.
This study aims to analyze the performance of
BAZNAS in Depok, Tangerang, Bogor, Bekasi and
BAZIS Administration of North, South, East, West
and Central Jakarta by using institutional indicators
of NZI and DEA and to know graph of performance
deployment of zakat institutions with both methods.
2 ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK
2.1 Zakat, Infaq, Shadaqah/Alms (ZIS)
Zakat in a word means purifying, growing or
developing. Whereas in terms of zakat means
issuing a number of assets to people who have the
right to receive (mustahik) in accordance with
Islamic law (Wibisono, 2015). Zakat is a maaliyyah
ijtima'iyyah worship which has a very important
position, is strategic and determines both in terms of
Islamic teachings and in terms of developing the
welfare of the society (Hafidhuddin, 2002). The
existence of zakat is considered as ma'luum minad-
in bidh-dharuurah which is automatically known
and becomes an absolute part of one's Islam (Yafie,
1994).
In the Al-Quran, there are about 35 verses which
discuss zakat, 27 of which the word "zakat" is
always juxtaposed with the word "prayer". This
shows that zakat and prayer have equal positions
(IZDR 2009). Some scholars believe that whoever
leaves zakat then he has left the prayer, and vice
versa. Allah SWT said:
“And establish prayer and give zakah and bow
with those who bow [in worship and obedience].”
(Al-Baqarah, 2:43)
“...........But if they should repent, establish
prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way.
Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.” (At-
Tawbah, 9:5)
Infaq comes from the word nafaqa which means
to leave. Whereas according to the term infaq is to
issue something (property) for the benefit of being
ordered by Allah SWT. Infaq has 2 characteristics,
namely compulsory and sunnah. Forms of
compulsory infaq are expiation, nadzar, livelihood,
etc. While the form of sunnah infaq is infaq to the
poor, assistance from natural disasters, etc. Sunnah
or voluntary information is an addition to zakat.
“The example of those who spend their wealth in
the way of Allah is like a seed [of grain] which
grows seven spikes; in each spike is a hundred
grains. And Allah multiplies [His reward] for whom
He wills. And Allah is all-Encompassing and
Knowing.” (Al-Baqarah, 2:261)
Alms or Sadaqah come from Arabic which
means honest or true. Alms can be interpreted as
evidence of honesty or the truth of one's faith. Alms
is voluntary without the provisions of nishab, haul,
and asnaf. The scope of Alms is wider than zakat
and infaq. Alms is not only in the form of property
or material, but can be in the form of actions such as
helping others, keeping words, smiles, etc. An alms
Performance Analysis of Zakat Intitutions in Indonesia by using NZI and DEA in Jabodetabek, Indonesia
87
is also a form of jariyah charity. Allah SWT gives
many rewards for the Muslims who give charity,
such as eradicating sins, multiplying merit,
extinguishing the tormenting fire, extending the
chest, extending the age, etc. The messenger of
Allah -peace and prayer of Allah be upon him- said:
“Giving alms can erase sins just like water
ceases fire.” (Narrated by Tirmidhi, classed sahih by
Al Albani in Shahih At Tirmidzi, in hadith no. 614)
“Wealth will not be decreased by giving by
giving charity. And a forgiving slave must be
rewarded by Allah with authority.” (Narrated by
Muslim, no. 2588)
2.2 Performace of Zakat Institutions
Performance is defined as a "degree of
accomplishment" or a level of achievement of
results (Keban, 2003). Performance is the result of
an activity (Robbins & Coultr, 2009). The
performance also refers to the level of success and
the ability to carry out tasks and achieve
predetermined goals (Gibson, Ivancevich, &
Donnely, 1994). From this definition, it can be
concluded that performance is an achievement of the
results of an activity that refers to the ability to carry
out tasks in accordance with the stated goals.
The United Nations Development Program
(UNDP "Governance and Sustainable Human
Development, 1997") states that performance is part
of good governance. Related performance by
fulfilling the interests of stakeholders by utilizing
resources as well as possible. Performance can
include cost-effectiveness, capacity, responsiveness,
dissemination of information to the public,
monitoring and management evaluation (Graham,
Amos, & Plumptre, 2003).
Zakat institutions is an Islamic institution that
aims to reduce poverty and ensure social justice
(Kasri & Putri, 2018). The core activity of zakat
institutions is to collect ZIS funds from Muslims
who have fulfilled the requirements and distribute
the funds to those who are entitled to (mustahik). In
addition to managing funds in accordance with
Islamic law, zakat institutions must also be
managed efficiently and professionally (Noor,
Rasool, Yusof, & Ali, 2012). Zakat institutions
must also implement good governance because it
contributes to the efficiency and effectiveness of
managing ZIS funds (Wahab & Rahman, 2011).
Zakat institutions which implements good
governance is a responsible, transparent and fair
organization. Zakat institutions who do not
implement good governance can reduce public trust.
Negative perceptions of the zakat management if
unhandled can have a negative impact on the
development of the zakat institutions (Sanep &
Radiah, 2009). Therefore, the measurement of zakat
institutions performance is very important in
maintaining public trust (Noor, Rasool, Yusof, &
Ali, 2012).
2.3 National Zakat Index (NZI)
The National Zakat Index (NZI) is an index
compiled by the Center of Strategic Studies
(PUSKAS) BAZNAS as a measuring tool to
evaluate the performance of national zakat at the
aggregate level (national and provincial). NZI is
expected to provide an overview of the role of zakat
on the welfare of mustahik, and also shows the
extent to which zakat institutions have been built,
both in terms of internal institutions, community
participation and government support (Center of
Strategic Studies BAZNAS, 2016).
With the establishment of the NZI, it is expected
that there is a standard for measuring zakat
performance in Indonesia which can be measured
periodically so that continuous evaluation can be
carried out. In addition to national level
measurements, NZI can also be done at the
provincial and district/city levels so that regional
comparisons can be carried out. The NZI component
can also be measured separately such as an
institutional component that can assess the
performance of zakat management organizations at
the national and regional levels. The final value of
the index ranges from 0.00 - 1.00. The closer to 1,
the better the performance of zakat.
3 METHOD
This research is a quantitative research using the
NZI method and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)
to measure zakat institutions performance in 2017.
NZI has two dimensions, namely the macro
dimensions and micro dimensions. This study uses a
micro-dimension approach with institutional
indicators. As for measuring performance in terms
of zakat institutions efficiency, the author uses the
DEA method with DEAP version 2.1 application.
The author uses 2 methods because IZN is a new
measurement formed by BAZNAS and for the last 2
years this method is often used by BAZNAS as a
material for zakat performance evaluation both
nationally and regionally, while DEA is a method
that has been applied in several institutions for a
SEABC 2018 - 4th Sriwijaya Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference
88
long time so that the use of 2 methods have their
respective advantages and enrich data analysis.
The data used in this study are primary and
secondary data. Primary data is obtained directly
from respondents through interviews with
informants determined by BAZNAS and BAZIS.
Meanwhile, secondary data is obtained from
financial reports and literature studies.
3.1 Institutional Indicators of NZI
The institutional indicators of NZI are used to
assess the performance of zakat institutions at the
national and regional levels. This indicator has 4
variables, namely collection, management,
distribution, and reporting. Each variable has an
assessment component. The components in each
variable can be seen in Appendix 1. The assessment
of each component is measured by a Likert scale of
1 to 5. The higher the scale, the better the value
obtained by zakat institutions. Each variable in this
indicator also has a weight so that the calculation
results range from 0 to 1. The closer to 1, the better
performance of zakat institutions. Following is the
calculation of the weights of each variable index:
X
21
= 0.30X
211
+0.20 X
212
+0.30 X
213
+0.20X
214
(1)
where,
X
21
= Indicator index of institution
X
211
= Variable index of collection
X
212
= Variable index of management
X
213
= Variable index of distribution
X
214
= Variable index of reporting
3.2 Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a non-
parametric method to measure the relative efficiency
and managerial performance of a Decision Making
Unit (DMU). Based on Charnes et al (1978), DEA
was initially widely used in the banking industry, but
DEA can also be applied to several industries, one of
which is the zakat institution. Measurement of
efficiency is measured by how far the production
point of a particular DMU is to the efficient frontier
point. An efficient DMU will get a value of 1, the
closer to 0 the DMU is declared inefficient. This
method also makes it possible to know the source of
inefficiencies from each input or output and see how
efficient the input and output inefficiencies can be.
DEA was first introduced by Charnes, Cooper,
and Rhodes in 1978. This method has a relative
calculation result. The efficiency value can be
measured by calculating the ratio between the
weighted amount of output and the number of
weighted inputs. The efficiency of DMU calculation
formulation can be formulated as follows:
(2)
Where,
u
1
= weights for output i
y
1j
= output 1 from unit j
v
1
= weights for input 1
x
1j
= input 1 for unit j
DEA has several approaches to see the
relationship between input and output. In Hadad et.
al (2003) there are three approaches to see the
relationship of input and input for financial
institution using both parametric and non-parametric
methods, namely the production approach, the
intermediation approach and the asset value
approach. The production approach sees financial
institutions as producers from deposit accounts and
loan loans. The intermediation approach sees
financial institutions as intermediaries who transfer
and convert financial assets from surplus units to
deficit units. Finally, the asset value approach is
almost similar to intermediation, which sees
financial institutions as producers of loan loans in
the form of assets.
DEA has two models, namely the BCC and CCR
models. The BCC model was developed by Banker,
Charner, and Cooper (1984). The BCC model states
that competition and financial constraints can cause
companies not to operate on an optimal scale. This
problem is overcome by assuming the Return to
Scale Variable (VRS), meaning that the addition of
input of n times will not result in an increase in
output n times (can be smaller or larger). This
condition will lead to Increasing Return to Scale
(IRS) and Decreasing Return to Scale (DRS). An
efficient DMU on this model is called technically
efficient. While the CCR model was developed by
Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes (1978). This model
assumes that the addition of input of n times will
increase the output of n times or also called Constant
Return to Scale (CRS). An efficient DMU in this
model is called overall efficiency, which is
technically efficient and scale.
Performance Analysis of Zakat Intitutions in Indonesia by using NZI and DEA in Jabodetabek, Indonesia
89
Figure 1: Efficiency CRS and VRS
Source : (Coelli, Rao, O'Donner, & Battese, 2005)
The picture above shows the difference in
efficiency based on CRS and VRS. The line with
upward sloping shows the frontier line with the CRS
model that describes the DMU's performance on an
optimal scale. While the curved line shows the
frontier line with the VRS model which describes
the DMU's performance on technical efficiency.
This study uses a production approach that sees
zakat institutions as a producer that generates
collected funds, channeled funds and the number of
muzakki and munfiq. The author chooses an output
orientation because Indonesia has a large potential
for ZIS but the realization of ZIS collection is still
low. This study also uses the CCR model which has
CRS assumptions. There are 2 inputs and 3 outputs,
the input is operating expenses (which are all
expenses that include all expenses except salary and
benefits expense) and the number of amil. While the
output is ZIS collection, ZIS distribution and the
number of muzakki and munfiq.
4 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The table below is the results of the performance
of BAZNAS and BAZIS in Jabodetabek as
measured by institutional indicators NZI. It can be
seen that the reporting variable has the lowest
average index value with an index of 0.56. This is
because BAZNAS of Bekasi, Depok, Tangerang,
and Bogor have not audited the financial statements
by the independent auditor so that the index value of
this variable is low and causes the average index to
be low as well. Whereas in the distribution variable,
it becomes a variable with the highest average index
value of 0.94. This indicates that BAZNAS and
BAZIS in Jabodetabek have been very good in terms
of the distribution of ZIS funds. The collection
variable has a very good index value of 0.83 which
means there is a potential increase in ZIS fund
collection each year, an increase in ZIS collection
each year so that can reduce the gap between
potential and ZIS collection. In the collection
variable, it can be seen that BAZNAS Depok has an
index value of 0.00 this is because BAZNAS Depok
has only been established at the end of 2016.
Tabel 2: Institutional Performance Index by NZI of Zakat
Institutions in 2017
Zakat
Institutions
/Indicators
Manage
-ment
Distribut
-ion
Repo
r-ting
Bekasi
0,75
1,0000
0,25
Depok
0,75
0,9375
0,25
Bogor
0,75
1,0000
0.50
Tangerang
0,75
0,9375
0,25
South
Jakarta
0,75
0,9375
0,75
North
Jakarta
0,75
0,9375
0,75
West
Jakarta
0,75
0,9375
0,75
Central
Jakarta
0,75
0,8750
0,75
East Jakarta
0,75
0,9375
0,75
Mean
0,75
0,9444
0,56
Min
0,75
0,8750
0,25
Max
0,75
1,0000
0,75
Source: Processed by Author
After getting the results of the institutional
performance index, the next step is to weight each
index for the entire variable. The collection and
distribution variables have a weight of 30% while
the management and reporting variables have a
weight of 20%. After weighing each variable, the
results are summed to produce the final value which
can be seen in Table 3.
Table 3 shows the performance ranking of
BAZNAS and BAZIS in Jabodetabek based on IZN
institutional indicators. It can be seen that there are 3
institutions that have very good category, 5
institutions with good category and 1 institution with
fairly good category. BAZIS Administration of
South and East Jakarta has the highest institutional
performance index of 0.881 with a very good
category. While BAZNAS Depok has the lowest
institutional performance index of 0.481 with a
fairly good category. Overall, the institutional
SEABC 2018 - 4th Sriwijaya Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference
90
performance index of BAZNAS and BAZIS in
Jabodetabek amounted to 0.761 with good category.
Table 3: Rank of Institutional Performance of Zakat
Institutions in 2017
Rank
Zakat
Institutions
Result
Category
1
South
Jakarta
0,881
Very Good
1
East
Jakarta
0,881
Very Good
2
Central
Jakarta
0,862
Very Good
3
Tangerang
0,781
Good
4
Bogor
0,775
Good
5
West
Jakarta
0,731
Good
6
North
Jakarta
0,731
Good
7
Bekasi
0,725
Good
8
Depok
0,481
Fairly Good
Mean
0,761
Good
Source: Processed by Author
In addition to measuring performance with IZN,
the author also uses the DEA method to measure the
performance of BAZNAS and BAZIS in
Jabodetabek in terms of efficiency. The table below
explains the results of the efficiency of BAZNAS
and BAZIS in Jabodetabek. There were 9 DMUs in
2017 which were BAZNAS and BAZIS in
Jabodetabek.
Table 4: DEAP’s Calculation Results
2017
Number of DMU
9
DMU’s efficient
4
Mean
0,752
Min
0,125
Max
1,000
St. Dev
0,355
Input Slacks
Number of Amil
0,000
Operating Expense
0,000
Output Slacks
ZIS Collection
1039,353
ZIS Distribution
468,986
Number of muzakki
and munfiq
473,276
Source: Processed by Author
Based on the table above, the average efficiency
of BAZNAS and BAZIS in Jabodetabek is fairly
good in 2017 of 0.752. The maximum value of
efficiency is 1. In 2017 there were 4 DMUs that
were already efficient, namely BAZIS
Administration of South and East Jakarta and
BAZNAS Bekasi and Tangerang. Input slacks show
that the average input value can be reduced so that
the DMU can reach the frontier efficiency point.
From the input side there are no inefficiencies. On
the other hand, Output slacks show an average
output value that can be increased so that the DMU
can reach the frontier efficiency point. In 2017, all of
output variables have inefficiencies.
Table 5: Rank of Efficiency Performance of Zakat
Institutions in 2017
No
DMU
Efficiency
Rank
1
South Jakarta
1,000
1
2
East Jakarta
1,000
1
3
Tangerang
1,000
1
4
Bekasi
1,000
1
5
West Jakarta
0,877
2
6
Central Jakarta
0,832
3
7
North Jakarta
0,767
4
8
Bogor
0,163
5
9
Depok
0,125
6
Source: Processed by Author
Table 5 shows the results of the efficiency of
BAZNAS and BAZIS in Jabodetabek in 2017. It can
be seen that in 2017 there were 4 DMUs that were
efficient, namely BAZIS Administration of South
and East Jakarta, BAZNAS Tangerang, and Bekasi.
The four zakat institutions get the highest ranking.
On the other hand, 5 DMUs are not efficient yet.
BAZNAS Depok City has the lowest efficiency
value in 2017 which BAZNAS Depok occupy the
last rank among other DMUs.
Figure 2: Performance of BAZNAS and BAZIS in
Jabodetabek
Source: Processed by Author
Performance Analysis of Zakat Intitutions in Indonesia by using NZI and DEA in Jabodetabek, Indonesia
91
The Figure above is a combination of BAZNAS
and BAZIS performance in Jabodetabek with NZI
and DEA which are divided into four quadrants.
Each performance based on NZI and DEA is divided
at 0.5 with the NZI as the x-axis and DEA as the y-
axis. Quadrant 1 contains zakat institutions which
has NZI and DEA values above 0.5. Quadrant 2
contains zakat institutions which has an NZI value
below 0.5 and a DEA value above 0.5. Quadrant 3
contains zakat institutions which has an NZI value
above 0.5 and a DEA value below 0.5. Whereas
quadrant 4 contains zakat institutions which has NZI
and DEA values below 0.5. It can be said that
quadrant 1 is a quadrant with good performance,
quadrant 4 is a quadrant with poor performance,
while quadrants 2 and 3 are quadrants with
performance between the two.
Based on the graph above, it can be seen that
from 9 zakat institutions , 7 zakat institutions are in
quadrant 1, 1 zakat institution is in quadrant 3 and 1
zakat institution is in quadrant 4. BAZNAS Bogor
Depok are two zakat institutions outside of quadrant
1. Based on NZI, BAZNAS Bogor has a good
performance, it can be seen from the position of the
x-axis that is leaning towards the right, but in the
efficiency of BAZNAS Bogor has a below-average
efficiency so that the position of the y-axis is
downward. BAZNAS Depok also has a fairly good
performance based on the NZI, seen in the x-axis
position which is almost in the middle, but in terms
of efficiency BAZNAS Depok also has a value
below average so that the position of the y-axis is
downward. Although BAZNAS Depok is in
quadrant 4, its position approaches the inter-
quadrant boundary axis so that it can be said that the
performance of the BAZNAS Depok is not too bad.
5 CONCLUSION AND
RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Conclusion
There is three conclutions from result of this
research, First, Performance measurement based on
NZI institutional indicators shows the average
performance of BAZNAS and BAZIS in
Jabodetabek in 2017 is 0.761 with a good category.
There are 3 institutions with very good categories, 5
institutions with good categories and 1 institution
with good categories.
Second, Efficiency measurement based on data
envelopment analysis with output orientation CCR
model shows the average performance of BAZNAS
and BAZIS in Jabodetabek in 2017 0.752. There
were 4 DMUs that were efficient.
Third, combination of BAZNAS and BAZIS
performance in Jabodetabek with the x-axis is the
NZI and the y-axis is DEA shows that the majority
of performance data distribution is in the quadrant 1.
Only BAZNAS Depok and Bogor are in quadrants 4
and 3. BAZNAS Bogor in quadrant 3 has a
performance which is good in NZI but DEA is
inefficient, this is due to the proportion of input use
which is greater than other DMUs. BAZNAS Depok
has a fairly good on the NZI but DEA is inefficient.
This is due to the fact that BAZNAS Depok has only
been operating at the end of 2017 so that from a
financial and structural perspective it is still not
optimal.
5.2 Recommendation
BAZNAS and BAZIS in Jabodetabek can make
zakat maps in their respective regions both in terms
of muzakki and mustahik so as to provide an
overview of the potential and distribution of zakat in
the region.
BAZNAS and BAZIS in Jabodetabek can
increase the socialization of ZIS both direct
socialization and social media as well as
transparency in the collection and distribution of ZIS
funds in both media so as to increase public
awareness and trust in the importance of paying
zakat to institutions formal.
The Central of BAZNAS can provide
information related to zakat institutions financial
statements throughout Indonesia as is done by Bank
of Indonesia in relation to the publication of bank
financial reports throughout Indonesia so that the
zakat institutions financial statements can be
accessed easily by the wider community and
subsequent researchers and data can be obtained
easily.
In addition, Central of BAZNAS can also make
performance ratings from zakat institutions
throughout Indonesia. Rating can be done once a
year. With the measurement of zakat institutions
ratings throughout Indonesia, it is expected to be an
evaluation material and motivation for the Amil of
zakat institutions so that performance is increasing
every year.
The researcher can further increase the number
of zakat institutions studied, compare government
and community zakat institutions on the same scale,
using different input-output variables so as to
provide a broader picture. In addition, it can measure
the efficiency with other methods such as the
SEABC 2018 - 4th Sriwijaya Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference
92
parametric method, namely SFA (Stochastic Frontier
Analysis).
REFERENCES
Al-Qur’an Al-Karim
Abdullah, M. And Sapiei, Noor S. (2018). Do religiosity,
gender and educational background influence zakat
compliance? The case of Malaysia. International
Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 45 Issue: 8,
pp.1250-1264
Ahmed, H. and Md Salleh, A.M.H.A.P. (2016), Inclusive
Islamic financial planning: a conceptual framework,
International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern
Finance and Management, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 170-189.
al-Qaradhawi, Y. (1973). Fiqh az-Zakat. Beirut:
Muassasat ar-Risalah
Al-Qaradhawi, Y. (1999). Hukum Zakat. Bogor: Litera
Antara Nusa
Ardianto, W. (2018, Januari 18). Liputan 6. Retrieved Juni
10, 2018, from
https://www.liputan6.com/read/3230831/perkembanga
n-depok-kian-mencolok
Badan Amil Zakat Nasional. (2016). Statistik Zakat
Nasional. Jakarta: Bagian SIM dan Pelaporan
BAZNAS.
BAZIS Provinsi DKI Jakarta. (2015). Laporan Kegiatan
dan Program Kerja. Jakarta: BAZIS Provinsi DKI
Jakarta.
BAZIS Provinsi DKI Jakarta. (2018). Laporan Kegiatan
dan Program Kerja. Jakarta: BAZIS Provinsi DKI
Jakarta.
BAZNAS Kota Bogor. (2017). Laporan Tahunan
BAZNAS Kota Bogor. Bogor: BAZNAS Kota Bogor.
BAZNAS Kota Tangerang. (2016). Laporan Pelaksanaan
Pengelolaan Zakat BAZNAS Kota Tangerang Tahun
2016. Tangerang: BAZNAS Kota Tangerang.
Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. P., O'Donner, C. J., & Battese, G. E.
(2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity
Analysis. New York: Springer Science+Business
Media, Inc.
Dardak, H. (2014, 02 19). Jabodetabek Calon Megapolitan
Terbesar ke-2 di Dunia. (D. Finance, Interviewer)
Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., & Donnely, J. H. (1994).
Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes. New
York: McGraw-Hill.
Graham, J., Amos, B., & Plumptre, T. (2003). Principles
for good governance in the 21st century. Ottawa:
Institute On Governance.
Hafidhuddin, D. (2002). Zakat dalam Perekonomian
Modern. Jakarta: Gema Insani.
Kasri, R. A., & Putri, N. I. (2018). Does Strategic
Planning Matter in Enhancing Performance of Zakah
Organization? Some Insights from Zakah Management
in Indonesia. International Journal of Zakat Vol.3, 1-
21.
Keban, T. Y. (2003). Enam Dimensi Strategis
Administrasi Publik: Konsep, Teori dan Isu.
Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Khurshid, M.A., Al-Aali, A., Soliman, A.A. and
Mohamad Amin, S. (2014). Developing an Islamic
corporate social responsibility model (ICSR).
Competitiveness Review, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 258-274
M., H. Z. (1991). Economic Functions of an Islamic State
(The Early Experience). Leicester: The Islamic
Foundation.
Noor, A. H., Rasool, M. S., Yusof, R. M., & Ali, S. M.
(2012). Assessing Performance of Nonprofit
Organization: A Framework for Zakat Institutions.
British Journal of Economics, Finance and
Management Sciences Vol. 5, 12-22.
Pusat Kajian Strategis BAZNAS. (2016). Indeks Zakat
Nasional. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Strategis BAZNAS.
Pusat Kajian Strategis BAZNAS. (2017). Outlook Zakat
Indonesia. Jakarta: BAZNAS.
Robbins, S. P., & Coultr, M. (2009). Management. New
York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Wahab, N. A., & Rahman, A. R. (2011). A framework to
analyse the efficiency and governance of zakat
institutions. Journal of Islamic Accounting and
Business Research Vol. 2, 43-62.
Wibisono, Y. (2015). Mengelola Zakat Indonesia. Jakarta:
Prenadamedia Group.
Yafie, A. (1994). Menggagas Fiqih Sosial. Bandung
Performance Analysis of Zakat Intitutions in Indonesia by using NZI and DEA in Jabodetabek, Indonesia
93
Appendix 1. Scoring of Institutional Indicators NZI
No
Variable
Criteria (1= Very weak, 2= weak, 3= neutral, 4= strong, 5= very strong)
1
2
3
4
5
1
Collection
Growth (YoY)
<5%
Growth (YoY)
5-9%
Growth (YoY)
10-14%
Growth (YoY)
15-19%
Growth
(YoY) >20%
2
Management
SOP zakat
management,
strategic planning,
ISO certification /
quality
management, and
the annual
working program
are unavailable
Have at least one
of documents
from these
required
documents; SOP
zakat
management,
strategic planning,
ISO/quality
management, and
the annual
working program
Have at least two
of documents
from these
required
documents; SOP
zakat
management,
strategic planning,
ISO/quality
management, and
the annual
working program
Have at least three
of documents
from these
required
documents; SOP
zakat
management,
strategic planning,
ISO/quality
management, and
the annual
working program
SOP zakat
management,
strategic planning,
ISO certification/
quality
management, and
the annual
working program
are available
3
Distribution
ACR <20%
ACR 20-49%
ACR 50-69%
ACR 70-89%
ACR ≥90%
SP >12 months
SP 9-12 months
SP 6-<9 months
SP 3-<6 months
SP <3 months
EP >15 months
EP 12-15 months
EP 9-<12 months
EP 6-<9 months
EP <6 months
No budget
allocation for
Da’wah program
Budget allocation
for DP at least 0.1
- < 2.5 % from
total distribution
budget
Budget allocation
for DP at least
2.5 - < 7.5 % from
total distribution
budget
Budget allocation
for DP at least
7.5 - < 10 %
from total
distribution
budget
Budget allocation
for DP at least
>= 10 %
from total
distribution
budget
4
Reporting
Do not have any
financial report
Have financial
report which is
not audited by
independent
auditor
Have audited
financial report
with qualified
opinion, adversed
opinion, and
disclaimer
Have audited
financial report
with unqualified
opinion and
periodic
publication
Have audited
financial report
withunqualified
opinion,
Sharia audit
report, and
periodic
publication
Source: PUSKAS BAZNAS
Explanation:
ACR = Allocation to Collection Ratio, SP = Social Program (Consumptive Program), EP = Economic Program
(Productive Program), DP = Da’wah Program
Definition:
Social program
Zakat distribution program is designed to meet the needs of mustahik which are urgent and short-term (al-
Hajjah al-Massah) as well as a charitable act, including health care and education.
Economic program
Zakat distribution program that focuses in empowering mustahik and aims to equip mustahik with the ability to
meet their needs in the long term.
Da’wah Program
Zakat distribution program that focuses in strengthening the spiritual of mustahik, including advocacy
programs within the framework to defense the interests of mustahik, as well as the overall community
awareness efforts that are shown by active support on the development of national zakat.
SEABC 2018 - 4th Sriwijaya Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference
94