
 
 
 
effective way of teaching students to achieve targeted 
learning objectives. 
Thematic learning is actually developed with the 
background of the importance of developing multiple 
intelligences of early childhood.  The thesis research 
of Iffah Qurrotul  Aini-2014  on  the development of 
Brain Based Learning Thematic Learning Model - in 
Graduate Research Scheme Graduate (Akbar, 2015) 
that the model is able to develop the intelligences: 
linguistic,  musical,  spatial,  naturalist,  kinaesthetic, 
interpersonal, intrapersonal, and logical intelligence. 
(Semiawan, 2008) states  that  thematic learning  not 
only shows  cognitive but also  involves students  in 
learning so that students appear to be active. Activity  
and  student  involvement  is  what  makes  thematic  
learning  able  to  stimulate  all  intelligence (including 
NAM) developed. 
Implementation  of  thematic  learning  can  make 
students  active and  creative.  The results  of  the  S2 
thesis  research  by  Harini-2014,  Hafi-2014  and 
Wulandari-1014 in the Post-Grants Research Scheme 
found that  the  implementation  of  thematic  learning  
can    enhance   visual,    verbal,    listening,   writing,  
drawing,  motoring,  mental  and  emotional  activity 
(Akbar, 2015). Hafi-2014 found that it appears from 
the  liveliness  of  drawing  diagrams,  discussing, 
presenting in discussions, and seeking  information. 
Mental activeness appears in student involvement in 
problem  solving,  completion  of  tasks,  and  self-
evaluation (Akbar, 2015). (Wulandari, 2016) also the 
application  of  thematic  creative  simulations  using 
imaginary puppets can improve the ability to criticize 
and praise in polite language (Akbar, 2015). Active 
involvement  of  learners  is  very  basic.  (Sardiman, 
2010)  states  that  learning  is  doing  to  change 
behaviour. There is no learning if there is no activity. 
Creative Learning can make students creative in a 
fun  atmosphere.  Creative  thinking  is  synonymous 
with  thinking  divergent  open-minded  form  of  an 
issue.  Thinking  and  analysing  a  problem,  doing 
synthesis, and evaluation. This thinking ability makes 
students  able  to  be  flexible.  The  process  of 
internalizing  religious  and  moral  values  is  done 
through  thematic  learning  that  allows  students  to 
think  divergently  in  their  learning  process  enables 
them  to  be  flexible  when  engaging  in  social 
relationships with others. For that, NAM is very good 
if integrated through thematic learning. 
 
5  CONCLUSION 
The  integration  of  NAM  in  the  thematic  learning 
process can be done through two models: first, NAM 
is integrated through the chosen method and used in 
the  thematic  learning  process.  Second,  NAM  is 
integrated  through  all  the  thematic  learning 
components-student  components,  teachers,  learning 
resources  and  media,  learning  methods,  learning 
situations, and assessments. Integration The value of 
religion  and  morals  in  thematic  learning  is  very 
effective in the attainment of learning objectives that 
are  sophisticated,  activate  and  engage  students  in 
optimal  learning,  and  make  students  creative. 
Involvement, liveliness,  and  creativity are  the ones 
that  enable  learners  broad  and  supple  -flexible  in 
doing relationships with other human beings. 
REFERENCES 
Akbar, S. (2007) ‘Penerapan Pembelajaran Tematik untuk 
Meningkatkan  Kualitas  Pembelajaran  Tema 
Lingkungan  di Kelas 3  SDN  Tanjungrejo  3  Malang’, 
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 35(2). 
Akbar, S. (2010) ‘Model Pembelajaran Nilai dan Karakter 
berbasis  Nilai-nilai  Kehidupan’,  Jurnal  Ilmu 
Pendidikan, 17(1), pp. 46–54. 
Akbar,  S.  (2012)  ‘Implementasi  Model  Triprakoro  untuk 
Pembelajaran Nilai Kerjasama’, Jurnal Penelitian Dan 
Pendidikan IPS, Januari. 
Akbar, S. (2013) ‘Model Triprakoro untuk Pengembangan 
Nilai Kepatuhan’, Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 19(1). 
Akbar,  S.  (2015)  Pembelajaran  Tematik  (Buku  berbasis 
Riset). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang. 
Akbar,  S.  (2016)  ‘Optimize  The  Role  of  Schools  in 
Building  Character’,  in  Prosiding  Seminar 
Internasional ICET-2. Malang: Malang: FIP UM. 
Akbar,  S.  (2017)  ‘Instrumen  Perangkat  Pembelajaran’. 
Jakarta: Remaja Rosdakarya. 
Akbar,  S.,  I,  Wayan,  S.  and  Pujianto,  P.  (2010) 
‘Pengembangan  Model  Pembelajaran  Tematik  untuk 
Kelas-1 dan Kelas 2 Sekolah Dasar’, Jurnal Pendidikan 
dan Pembelajaran, 17(1), pp. 32–40. 
Kovalik, S. and Olsen, K. (1994) ITI: The model. Integrated 
thematic instruction. Kent, WA: Covington Square. 
Lickona,  T.  (1991)  Educating  for  Character:  How  Our 
School  Can  Teach  Respect  and  Responsibility.  New 
York: Bantam Books. 
Pappas, C. C. (1995) An integrated language perspective in 
the  elementary  school:  Theory  into  action.  Reading, 
MA: Addison-Wesley-Longman. 
Pigdon,  K.  and  Marlyn,  W.  (1992)  The  BIG  Picture 
Integrating  Children  Learning.  Melbourne:  Cleanor 
Curtain Publishing. 
Sardiman,  S.  (2010)  Media  Pembelajaran.  Jakarta: 
Rajawali Press. 
ICLI 2018 - 2nd International Conference on Learning Innovation
68