
 
became strong by 83,33% and 16,67% were in very 
strong  self  efficacy,  there  is  no  change  in  control 
group. 
Table 3 shows the average score of self efficacy 
in  both  groups.  Before  get  intervention,  control 
group had higher mean (24,7) of self efficacy score 
than  intervention  group  (25,1).  After  get 
intervention, the mean score of self efficacy higher 
(28,11)  than before  (24,7), and also  higher (28,11) 
than control group (24,95).  
Results  of  statistical  tests  using  independent  t-
test  in  both  groups  before  giving  intervention  was 
p=0,693, and after giving intervention was p=0,000. 
Based on test  result after giving intervention, there 
was difference of self-efficacy in both groups. The 
defference  indicated  that  coaching  affecting  self-
efficacy to perform salat. 
4  DISCUSSION 
In this research, self-efficacy score based on gender 
and age on each respondent are varies. This is not in 
line with the theory of Bandura (1997) which states 
that olders tend to have more time and experience in 
overcoming something that happens when compared 
with  younger individuals.  It  can  be  caused  by last 
education of respondents. In this study the most last 
education  of  respondents  are  high  schools  and  the 
average category of respondent’s self-efficacy are in 
a  strong  category.  Self-efficacy  can  be  formed 
through the learning process and formal education is 
one of ways in learning process. The individual has 
a  high  self-efficacy  according  their  length  in 
learning. 
Before  the  intervention,  the  average  score  of 
intervention  group  was  24.72  with  17  respondents 
had strong self-efficacy and 1 respondent had very 
strong  self-efficacy.  This  can  be  seen  from  the 
average of answers “confident” and “very confident” 
of respondents to their ability to perform salat in a 
sitting  or  lying  position,  and  there  are  some  still 
confident  the  obligation  to  perform  salat  during 
illness.  Some  respondents  also  answer  “confident” 
that family can help them in performing salat. This 
can be influenced by the information gained on how 
to  perform  salat  during  illness  that  obtained  from 
religious studies or religious community. It can also 
be  obtained  from the experience  of others  and  the 
support of family members during hospitalization. 
After the  intervention,  the  average score of the 
intervention  group  was  28.11  with  15  respondents 
had  a  strong  self-efficacy  and  3  respondents  had 
very strong self-efficacy. Increased self-efficacy can 
occur due to increased confidence in the obligation 
to  perform  salat  in  every  condition  and  increased 
confidence  in  the  ability  to  perform  salat  as  their 
ability.  While  in  the  control  group,  there  was  no 
increase in self-efficacy. All  control groups had an 
average self-efficacy score was 24.72 with a strong 
self-efficacy. 
Based on the statistical test, it can be stated that 
the provision of coaching can improve self-efficacy 
significantly. Coaching in this research consists of 5 
stages. The second and third stage are provision of 
education  and  practice  of  performing  salat  during 
illness  are  given  by  the  hospital's  guidance 
counselor. the results of this  study are in line with 
several  other  studies  such  as  the  study  of  health 
coaching on self efficacy and the study of wellness 
coaching in improving  self efficacy (Eom and Lee 
2017; Dejesus et al. 2018) 
The  research  of  the  effect  of  health  coaching 
program  on  self-efficacy,  health  behavior  and 
quality  of  life  in  hypertensive  people  in  poverty 
resulted  in  a  significant  effect  on  improving  self-
efficacy. Eom and Lee (2017) stated in his research 
that health coaching is the right strategy to improve 
patient’s  self-efficacy to continue  maintaining their 
health behavior. The results of this study are also in 
line  with  research  conducted  by  Dejesus  et  al. 
(2018)  that  wellness  coaching  can  improve  self-
efficacy.  Self-efficacy  can  be  improved  because 
coaching  enhances  positive  motivation  and  patient 
beliefs  about  their  abilities.  In  addition,  coaching 
also  makes  patients  and  coaches  have  regular 
schedule to meet and provide materials and training 
that  can  improve  the  motivation  and  ability  of 
patients. 
See  et  al.  (2014)  in  his  research  stated  that 
education  which  is  provided  personally  to 
hospitalized  patients  with  the  right  material  can 
improve  the  patient’s  self-efficacy  to  be  able  to 
recognize  and  report  symptoms  of  adverse 
conditions  that  can  be  experienced  by  patients. 
Education is part of health  coaching  that can  meet 
the  verbal  persuasion  in  order  to  improve  self-
efficacy. Bandura (1997) states that the individuals 
can gain influence or suggestion so they are able to 
overcome  the  problems  they  faced.  Verbal 
persuasion can be given  by influential  people  such 
as  family  and  experts  such  in  this  research  is  the 
religious  leaders  so  that  patients  will  be  more 
confident about salat. A person who is always given 
the belief and drive to succeed, then will show the 
behavior  to  achieve  that  success.  The  focus  of 
coaching includes factors that influence motivation, 
overcome  obstacles,  limit  the  disability  of  the 
INC 2018 - The 9th International Nursing Conference: Nurses at The Forefront Transforming Care, Science and Research
444