the family. It is the cause of the elderly have not 
chosen by complete end of life care. Based on 
Indonesian culture, the elderly are important 
members of the extended family. Their family, 
especially their children, have a close relationship 
with them (Riasmini, Sahar, & Resnawati, 2013), so, 
every decision must be discussed with the family. 
A third of the respondents who made the 
selection are no different to the seven other 
respondents regarding age, MMSE, or level of 
education. Improved knowledge, self-affection and 
behavior are also evident. This may be caused by 
their health being less favorable than other 
respondents. They already have limitations such as 
difficulty in walking, accompanied by post-stroke 
disorders. This is what allowed a third of 
respondents to make a choice for end-of-life care. 
The Asian culture allows discussion about a 
person's chronic disease, but this is carried out by 
health personnel and takes place with family or 
people close to and not directly with the patient. 
Family support is strongly associated with selection 
decisions about end of life (Bravo et al., 2012; Lim 
et al., 2012; Goodman et al., 2013). Lim et al. (2012) 
also state that discussion regarding the end of life in 
the Asian culture is still considered taboo. Modified 
ACP stages 1 and 2 have helped respondents discuss 
end-of-life healthcare, but respondents are still not 
open to discussing it.  
Stress affects perception response. In this study, 
stress perception relates to knowledge and 
confidence. Perceptual responses in this study are 
the end-of-life preferences. This study showed no 
difference in the theory. Improved knowledge and 
changes in confidence are not concomitant with the 
election of end-of-life care chosen by the elderly 
(Putra, 2011). Knowledge and confidence in the 
experimental group increased, but only a few 
respondents could discuss end-of-life care planning. 
This could be caused by the video provided not 
being based on condition of Indonesian culture. So, 
there are cultural factors that need to be considered 
in the formation of perceptual responses. The 
inability of the elderly to imagine the quality of their 
lives under certain circumstances, the so-called 
''paradoxical defect'', and the benefits and 
disadvantages of the treatment received may be the 
reason that not all elderly people are capable of 
discussing and planning the end of their lives 
(Volandes et al., 2009; Deep et al., 2010). 
This study has several limitations. ACP 
programs only used phase 1 and 2; phases 3–5 have 
not been carried out due to the time constraints of 
the study. Videos that were played by the 
researchers were taken from Australia and Taiwan 
with dialogue in English and Mandarin, so 
respondents may have had difficulty understanding 
the contents of the video, although it was translated 
into Indonesian. Discussions during Phase 2 did not 
include the family. A small number of respondents 
were included because it was challenging to 
persuade respondents to join this research. In the 
future, a larger number should be included to 
achieve more reliable results. Researchers advice on 
further research includes involving the family in 
Phase 2 of the ACP and create videos regarding 
dementia and ACP based on Indonesian culture. 
This would facilitate all respondents making end-of-
life care decisions. Nurses and nursing can motivate 
the elderly to make plans for their end-of-life care 
through the ACP modification program, as an 
independent nursing intervention. 
5 CONCLUSIONS 
An accurate and timely discussion of diseases and 
end-of-wlife care will help patients communicate 
with family and loved ones. ACP can give the 
elderly a real chance to have control over the 
ultimate choice of their lives. By educating the 
elderly on the topic of early treatment planning and 
effectively communicating and involving the 
families and medical personnel involved, nurses can 
provide patients with the best opportunity to make 
sure that others respect the final decision of their 
life.  
REFERENCES 
Abel, J. et al. (2013) ‘The impact of advance care 
planning of place of death, a hospice retrospective 
cohort study,’ BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 
3(2), pp. 168–173. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-
000327. 
Bert P.M. Creeemers and Creemers, B. P. M. (2007) 
‘Combining different ways of learning and teaching in 
a dynamic model of educational effectiveness,’ 
Journal of Basic Education, 17(1), pp. 1–39. 
Blackford, J. and Street, A. F. (2013) ‘Facilitating advance 
care planning in community palliative care: 
conversation starters across the client journey,’ 
International Journal Of Palliative Nursing, 19(3), pp. 
132–139. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2013.19.3.132. 
Bravo, G. et al. (2012) ‘Promoting advance planning for 
health care and research among older adults: A 
randomized controlled trial,’ BMC Medical Ethics. 
BioMed Central Ltd, 13(1), p. 1. doi: 10.1186/1472-