similar  mechanism  by  inhibiting  14-alpha-
demethylase resulting in disruption of sterol synthesis 
in the cell wall of the fungus. In vitro ITC is not only 
active  against  Malassezia  species  and  Candida 
species  but  is  also  active  against  dermatophyte  and 
nondermatophyte fungi. The dose of ITC used for PV 
is  200  mg/day  for  7  days,  with  a  minimum 
accumulative dose of 1000 mg for effective therapy. 
Four weeks after initial therapy, a cure rate of 80-90% 
has been reported (Faergemann et al, 2002). FLC is 
another  antifungal  class  of  azole  with  a  high 
absorption rate, in which optimum concentrations can 
be  found  in  the  skin  several  hours  after  being 
consumed in  small  doses. Benefits of  FLC includes 
rare side effects, mostly available, and preferred as it 
requires  only  two  or  three  weekly  doses,  compared 
with a 7-day regimen for ITC (200 mg/day) (Silva et 
al,  1998).  In  vitro  susceptibility  tests  of  the 
Malassezia  species  to  KTC,  Voriconazole  (VRC), 
ITC and FLC were performed by Miranda et al. which 
reported  that  the  Malassezia  species  are  highly 
susceptible  to  the  four  azole  preparations,  but  the 
susceptibility  to  KTC  and  ITC  appears  higher 
(Miranda et al, 2007). 
This study was conducted to assess the minimal 
inhibitory  concentration  (MIC)  antifungal  ITC  and 
FLC against M. furfur as the causative agent of PV in 
Makassar  in  vitro.  Previous  in  vitro  research  in 
Makassar  has  not  been  done  even  though  ITC  and 
FLC  are  one  of  the  most  effective  modes  of  PV 
therapy  for  recurrent  cases after treatment with 
topical  antifungal,  safer  than  other  antifungal,  and 
readily available. 
2  METHODS 
This  study  is  a  multi-center  cross  sectional 
observational  study  with  consecutive  sampling  that 
was  performed  in  microbiology  laboratory  of 
Hasanuddin University Faculty of Medicine in 2013. 
Specimen  of  21  samples  were  collected  by  skin 
scraping from the back or shoulder, upper arm, chest, 
face  and  neck  of  PV  patients  from  Dr.  Wahidin 
Sudirohusodo  Hospital  and  Hasanuddin  University 
Dermatovenereology  Department’s  networking 
hospital in  Makassar, of whom the diagnosis  of PV 
was confirmed by Wood’ s lamp, direct microscopic 
KOH  preparation,  culture  and  signed  the  informed 
consent.  Then  the  specimen  was  planted  on  the 
modified Dixon agar plate, incubated at 32-34°C and 
was regularly assessed to confirm the growth of yeast 
until  the  3
rd
  week.  Furthermore,  the  yeast  was 
identified by their morphology, catalase test and lipid 
assimilation test (growth of yeast in the presence of 
Tween-20, 40, 60, 80 and Cremophor El).  
The  in  vitro  susceptibility  test  by  determining 
MIC value of both antifungals was conducted using 
broth microdilution that was performed in accordance 
with  the  NCCLS  guidelines  in  document  M27-A2. 
The  inoculum  suspension  was  prepared  by  the 
spectrophotometric  method  obtaining  a  final 
inoculum  of  (0.5-2.5)x10
3
  cells/mL.  The  final 
concentrations  of  the  antifungal  agents  (ITC  and 
FLC)  were  128µg/mL  which  then  diluted  half  in 
series  and  was  inoculated  to  suspension  hence 
obtaining concentrations of 128 µg/mL, 64 µg/mL, 32 
µg/mL, 16  µg/mL, 8  µg/mL, 4  µg/mL,  2  µg/mL, 1 
µg/mL, 0.5 µg/mL, 0.25 µg/mL, 0.125 µg/mL, 0.06 
µg/mL, and 0.03 µg/mL with false positive and false 
negative  control  prepared.  Growth  of  each  various 
concentrations of all two drugs was recorded every 24 
h for 5 days of incubation at 32 ◦C. Cell growth was 
compared  with  growth  in  a  drug-free  control.  The 
MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of agent 
that  produced  none  or  90%  growth  in  comparison 
with the control. Data analysis was performed using 
SPSS. The Fisher Exact test was used to analyze the 
mean and distribution frequency of each drug with P 
value <0.05 is considered significant.   
3  RESULT 
Based  on  the  morphological  and  biochemical 
characteristics, the 21 isolates were identified as M. 
furfur.  MIC  showed  apparent  differences  in 
antifungal susceptibility against M. furfur. For all 21 
isolates,  the  MIC  for  ITC  ranged  from  <0.03–
0.25µg/mL  and  <0.03–2µg/mL  for  FLC.  The  MIC 
ranged,  MIC90  values  and  MIC  percentage  for  M. 
furfur are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1.