4.6  Benefits of Coping Strategies 
Formed by the Local Community 
in Pekauman Village of Sidoarjo 
Regency in Dealing with 
Emergency Caused by Floods 
The people are much better prepared in dealing with 
the flood and are able to cope with the problems and 
pressure that they face. For example, floods that 
continue for days do not make them feel stressed but 
make them more patient instead. 
5 CONCLUSION  
a.  All three informants exhibit active behaviors in 
dealing with emergency caused by the floods. 
For example, they secure valuable items, 
electricity to prevent short circuit, refrigerator 
and television to prevent contact with water. 
b.  If viewed from economic and educational point 
of view, there are various degrees of behaviors. 
From the economic perspective, the 2nd 
informant had renovated and elevated his house 
before the floods hit as a form of strategy. 
Meanwhile, from the perspective of higher 
education (in this case, bachelor degree), the 1st 
and 2nd informants requested the local 
government to provide water pumps to move the 
water into the water storage tanks as their 
strategy. 
c.  The people of Pekauman Village implement 
almost all forms of coping strategies. In 
Problem-Focused Coping, the strategies are 
being confrontational, seeking social support, 
and planning problem-solving solutions whereas 
in Emotional-Focused Coping, the strategies are 
self-control, diversion, positive judgment, 
acceptance of responsibility, and avoidance.  
d.  Factors that influence coping strategies are 
physical health, positive belief/outlook, problem-
solving skills, social skills, social support, and 
materials. 
e.  The processes and dynamics which form coping 
strategies are (1) the floods are not considered as 
stressor because floods often hit the area every 
year; (2) past experiences in similar situations 
make the people more confident in overcoming 
their own problems and the environment.
 
f. 
The benefit of coping strategies formed by the 
people of Pekauman Village is that the people 
can overcome the stress and find the solutions to 
overcome the problems in dealing with 
emergency caused by the floods.
 
REFERENCES 
BPBD-SIDOARJO. 2016. Rekap Kejadian Bencana 
(Non Kebakaran) 2016 Kabupaten Sidoarjo. 
[internet] tersedia dalam: 
http://bpbd.sidoarjokab.go.id/artikel-103.html. 
Accessed on 13 June 2017. 
Khasan. M, & Widjanarko. M. 2011. Perilaku 
Coping Masyarakat Menghadapi Banjir. Jurnal 
Psikologi Pitutur Online, Vol. 1, No. 2, Hal. 93-
103. [internet] available in:  
http://jurnal.umk.ac.id/index.php/PSI/article/vie
w/30/29 (accessed on 15 December 2016, 22.33 
WIB) 
Kodoatie, Robert.J. 2013. Rekayasa dan Manajemen 
Banjir Kota. Yogyakarta: C.V Andi Offset. 
Lazarus RS., Folkman S. 1984. Stress Appraisal and 
Coping. New York: Springer Publising 
Company. 
Ma’mun. 2007. Mengurai Ancaman Banjir Jakarta. 
Jakarta: Cerdasindo. 
Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, M.K., Guest, 
G., Namey, E. 2005. Qualitative research 
method: A data collector’s field guide. USA: 
Family Health International.  
Metropolis, Jawa Pos. 2016. Banjir Kepung Pusat 
Sidoarjo. Hal. 25. Tanggal 11 Oktober 2016. 
Sidoarjo: Jawa Pos. 
Mistra. 2007. Antisipasi Rumah di Daerah Rawan 
Banjir. Jakarta: Griya Kreasi.  
Mistra. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (edisi 
revisi). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. 
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Leech, N.L. 2007. Sampling 
desain in qualitative research: Making the 
sampling process more public. The Qualitative 
Report, 12, 238-254. 
Poerwandari, E.K. 2009. Pendekatan Kualitatif 
Untuk Penelitian Perilaku Manusia. Depok: 
Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia. 
Rasmun. 2004. Stres Coping dan Adaptasi. Jakarta: 
Sagung Seto.