
metabolical waste. A scaffold must be biocompatible 
and  bioresorbable  with  controllable  degradation 
levels  and  absorption  levels  which  are  suitable  for 
the growth of cells or tissue. Additionally, scaffold 
must  have  mechanical  characteristics  which  are 
appropriate  for  tissue located  in  implantation  areas 
(Humatcher  and  Dietmar,  2000).  Thus,  the 
biomaterial of bone scaffold is a potential alternative 
as  the  improvement  technique  of  bone  defects 
caused  by  trauma,  tumor  resection,  and  abnormal 
development (Mitsak et al., 2011). 
The  process  of  making  a  bone  graft  which  is 
based  on  a  composite  scaffold has been  conducted 
by several researchers, i.e. Venkatesan et al. (2008), 
by  synthesizing  the  composite  scaffold  chitosan, 
chondroitin  sulphate,  and  hydroxyapatite.  Chitosan 
was  chosen  since  it  has  some  characteristics  of 
biocompatibility,  biodegradability,  and  also  it  was 
expected  to  be  able  in  shaping  pores  and  be  an 
appropriate  media  for  the  cells’  growth.  Since  the 
ideal scaffold provides a suitable atmosphere for cell 
proliferation, it is necessary to add materials which 
could support the process of cell proliferation, such 
as  hydroxyapatite  (HA).  The  biggest  potential  of 
bone  substitution  indicated  by HA  is  the  ability  to 
build strong connection with skeletal groups, which 
is  osteoconductive  and  stable  toward  biological 
absorption  and  preventing  bad  impacts  for  humans 
(Orlovskii et al., 2002). The study showed that the 
additional  chondroitin  sulphate  with 
collagen/hydroxyapatite  caused  the  increase  of 
skeletal  remodeling,  new  bone  construction,  and 
osteoblast differentiation (Venkatesan  et al., 2012). 
Therefore,  by  adding  chondroitin  sulphate,  it  was 
expected  that  the  composite  scaffold  chitosan-
chondroitin sulphate/hydroxyapatite could be a bone 
graft  which  could  stimulate  the  cell  growth  and 
accelerate  the  process  of  the  skeletal  remodeling 
process.  The  research  will  be  conducted  by  using 
composition  variations  of  hydroxyapatite,  chitosan, 
and  sulphate  chondroitin  with  comparison  (A) 
50%:50%:0%,  (B)  50%:40%:10%,  (C) 
50%:35%:15%,  (D)  50%:30%:20%  and  (E) 
50%:25%:25% from the total mass. The objective of 
this  research  is  to  know  the  effect  of  adding 
chondroitin  sulphate  and  determine  the  best 
composition  of  composition  variation  of  chitosan-
chondroitin sulphate/hydroxyapatite as the candidate 
of bone graft. 
2  RESEARCH METHOD 
2.1  Materials 
The  materials  used  are  commercial  hydroxyapatite 
produced by Tissue Bank of Dr. Soetomo Hospital 
Surabaya,  chitosan  with  70%  DA,  the  synthetic 
result  of  Bogor  Agricultural  Institute,  chondroitin 
sulphate by Interlab CV, 2% acetic acid, 10% NaOH 
solution,  distilled  water,  ethanol  and  dehydrated 
alcohol  and  the  making  of  Simulation  Body  Fluid 
(SBF)  solution  by  using  K
2
HPO
4
.3H
2
O,  CaCl
2
.2 
H
2
O, NaCl, NaHCO
3
, Na
2
SO
4
, KCl, HCl, MgCl
2
.6 
H
2
O and (HOCH
2
)
3
CNH
2
. 
2.2  The Synthesis of Scaffold 
Composite of Chitosan-Chondroitin 
Sulphate/ Hydroxyapatite 
The  solution  of  chitosan-chondroitin  sulphate/ 
hydroxyapatite which has been prepared was moved 
into a  pot bottle.  To create a scaffold, the solution 
was frozen at -80
o 
C temperature for 5 hours. After 
that a process named freeze-drying was done to the 
frozen solution for 30 hours. 
After  the  freeze-drying  process,  the  sample  of 
composite  scaffold  chitosan-chondroitin 
sulphate/hydroxyapatite  was  marinated  in  10% 
NaOH solution for 24 hours to neutralize the acetic 
acid residual present in the sample. After that, it was 
cleansed  by  using  equades  until  it  reached  the 
neutral pH. Next, freeze-dying was done once again 
to relieve the water wastes in the composite sample 
of  chitosan-chondroitin  sulphate/hydroxyapatite 
scaffold. 
The next process is the characterization covering 
functional  group  testing  with  a  Fourier  Transform 
Infra-Red  (FTIR)  spectrophotometer  American 
Perkin Elmer Co, morphological  surface testing  by 
using  a  Scanning  Electron  Microscope  (SEM) 
inspect  S50,  FEI  Corp.,  porosity  test, 
biodegradability and cytotoxicity test by using MTT 
assay. 
Porosity  test  was  done  by  using  a  fluid 
displacement method. During the test, the sample of 
composite  scaffold  which  would  be  used  was 
initially  weighed  to  find  the  initial  weight  of  the 
sample. After that, the sample was marinated in 98% 
ethanol for 48 hours. After marinating, the scaffold 
sample was re-scaled along with the ethanol to find 
the weight of marinated scaffold in ethanol. The last 
step  was  measuring  the  ethanol  whose  sample  has 
been taken over. The final result of porosity testing 
was acquired from the initial weight of the scaffold 
(w
1
),  the  weight  of  scaffold  and  ethanol  which 
are  being  marinated  (w
2
),  and  the  final  weight  of 
ethanol after the scaffold was taken over (w
3
). Then, 
the  percentage  of  porosity  of  each  composite 
Characteristics of Composite Scaffold Chitosan-Chondroitin Sulphate / Hydroxyapatite as the Candidate of Bone Graft
237