
 
 
Table 2: Comparison between improved ACA and traditional ACA. 
 
The  results  of  the  simulation  analysis  and  the 
experimental  summary  show  that  the results  of the 
improved  ACA  are  all:  the optimal solution  of  the 
target  function is  1.90,  and  the combination  of  the 
corresponding  AM  supply  chain  is  (r
11
,  r
22
,  r
32
,  r
43
, 
r
51
), as shown in figure 7. But the improved ACA has 
converged at about 60 times and reached the optimal 
solution.  Compared  with  the  traditional  ACA,  the 
number  of  iterations  and  the  time  of  convergence 
have been reduced to a great extent, which ensures 
the  ability  of  the  algorithm  to  obtain  the  global 
search optimal solution at a certain speed. Therefore, 
the  improvement  of  the  traditional  ACA  is  an 
effective  improvement  algorithm,  which  improves 
the running speed of the algorithm significantly. 
 
 
Figure  7:  The  best  combination  of  candidate 
manufacturers. 
5  CONCLUSIONS 
In this paper, the strategy of improving the ACA in 
the AM  supply chain  is  described,  and  a  graphical 
representation of the establishment of the AM supply 
chain  is  made  and  its  mathematical  model  is 
constructed. It is pointed out that the essence of AM 
supply  chain  is  the  optimal  combination  of 
manufacturing enterprises. On the basis of analyzing 
the characteristics of the traditional ACA and genetic 
algorithm,  the  traditional  ACA  is  modified  from 5 
aspects, including the introduction of the population 
initialization  of  the  genetic  algorithm,  the  initial 
setting  of  pheromone,  the  introduction  of  the  path 
selection  strategy,  the  value  of    ρ,  and  the 
introduction  of  the  cross  mutation  of  the  genetic 
algorithm.  The  improved  ACA  and  its  execution 
process  are  described  in  detail.  By  comparing  the 
traditional  ACA  with  the  improved  ACA,  the 
advantages  of  the  improved  ACA  in  solving  the 
optimization combination problem of the AM supply 
chain are verified by the example of the AM supply 
chain of sofa products. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
Thank  the  National  Natural  Science  Foundation  of 
China  (Grant  No.  51475129,51675148,  51405117) 
for its strong support for this paper. 
REFERENCES 
1.  Jiang Xinsong. 1996, The main mode of enterprise in 
twenty-first Century - agile manufacturing enterprise, 
Computer integrated manufacturing system,2 (4): 3-8. 
2.  Katzy,  B.  R.,  1998,  Design  and  implementation  of 
virtual organizations, Hawaii International Conference 
on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, 142. 
3.  Zhang Qiang, Chen Wen, 2004, A method of selecting 
partners  in  dynamic  alliance  based  on  fuzzy  multi-
attribute  group  decision  making,  Fuzzy  system  and 
Mathematics, 18 (S1): 332-336. 
4.  Dong Jingfeng, Wang Gang and Lu Min, 2007, Multi 
supplier  selection  problem  based  on  improved  ant 
colony algorithm, Computer integrated manufacturing 
system, 13 (8): 1639-1644. 
5.  Dickson, G. W., 1996, An analysis of vendor selection 
systems and decision, Materials Science Forum. 1377-
1382. 
6.  Weber,  C.  A.,  Current  J  R  and  Benton  W  C,  1991, 
Vendor  selection  criteria  and  methods,  European 
Journal of Operational Research, 50(1):2-18. 
7.  Liu  Jin,  Guo  Jinchao,  2018,  Supplier  selection  in 
supply  chain  environment  based  on  entropy  method 
and  TOPSIS  method,  Business  economy  research, 
(06): 34-36. 
8.  Reed, M., Yiannakou A. and Evering R., 2014, An ant 
colony  algorithm  for  the  multi-compartment  vehicle 
Optimal solution of 
objective function 
Corresponding optimal 
combination