5. OPTIMIZATION 
The objective function is to minimize the maximum 
stress on the package. Optimizing the design 
variables is the choice of the thickness of each 
device and the material[9.]The state variables are 
considered as follows: 1.The maximum temperature 
of the package after heat generation to ensure that 
the initial temperature and initial stress distribution 
are not large before the thermal cycle; 2. The 
deformation of the package to meet the structural 
rigidity requirements. 3 The weight of the entire 
package to ensure that the weight of the structure 
changes within a certain range, with good 
application. Writing a mathematical model is as 
follows: Design variable: 
T
,
,
,
⋯,
t refers to the thickness of 
each device 
The objective function: 
min
 
max(T) 
 
(T) (k1,2,⋯,
) 
Restrictions: 
 
  1,2,⋯ 
σ,w denotes stress and deformation; j,k denotes 
the number of stress and deformation variables. 
Tab.4.3 he result with Chip Thiekness 
 
From the data in Table 3.2, it can be seen that, 
except for the data of the temperature gradient 
column, the other data is almost the same as the 
trend of the data in the scenario 1. Only the effect of 
stress and heat distortion is slightly different. The 
greater the thickness of the chip, the smaller the 
temperature gradient generated by the heat 
dissipation power
. This is due to the increase 
in the thickness of the chip, the volume of which 
also increases, and the heat generation per unit 
volume is inversely proportional to the volume, that 
is, the larger the volume, The smaller the heat 
generation, the lower the resulting temperature. The 
reduction of the chip thickness is beneficial to 
reduce the thermal stress, and the initial temperature 
gradient produced by the smaller thickness chip is 
also smaller, and the effect of the two causes the 
thermal stress value to be greatly reduced. Analysis 
from thermal deformation is more complicated. If 
the heat generation of the chip is not taken into 
account, the thermal deformation will become 
smaller and smaller as the thickness increases; the 
greater the thickness, the lower the temperature 
value resulting from heat generation, and the 
Structural analysis will have a reduced effect on 
thermal deformation, but this part of the impact 
factor is small, and the thermal deformation between 
the two is still smaller with increasing thickness. 
Although the greater the thickness of the chip, the 
smaller the stress and deformation can be but the 
weight will increase. Therefore, many aspects of the 
impact of the design calculations should be 
considered. 
6 CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK 
In this paper, two-dimensional and three-
dimensional finite element models are established 
for BPGA package, and the PBGA package is 
analyzed due to the factors such as alternating 
temperature load, heat dissipation power and forced 
heat dissipation, and the thermal performance 
parameters of each device are mainly thermal 
conductivity and thermal expansion coefficient. 
Internal thermal stress, thermal deformation and 
mechanical strength issues. Based on the numerical 
simulation analysis, the material and geometric 
dimensions of the package are optimized and 
calculated. The package model materials and 
dimensions for different design requirements are 
given. 
Based on the numerical simulation analysis, the 
entire package body was comprehensively 
optimized, and the optimization design was 
performed with the objective of minimizing the 
Chip
thickness
/mm
0.3191 0.3309 0.3471 0.3515
Maximum
temperature/
℃
63.39 63.315 63.228 63.209
Maximum
thermal
stress/
Mpa
92 90.03 88.3 87.8
Solder joint
stress/
Mpa
62.5 62.3 62.3 62.3
Solder joint
strain
0.008478 0.008498 0.008519 0.008508
Hot
de formation
of solder
joints /
μm
48 47.6 45.9 44.4