
Based on the  table of  tests of  Between-Subject 
effects we can see that line the independent variable 
(in this case teaching method finds an F-value of the 
effect  of    teaching    method  10.781  and  column 
labeled Sig the value is .002 where it is less than 0.05 
(an alternative alpha level). It means that two groups, 
experimental and control groups differ significantly. 
In pre-test line found an F-value of the effect of 
pre-test 45.674 and column sig, the value  is 0.000. 
This  is  less  than  0.01,  therefore  the  covariate  is 
significant.  This  value  also  indicates  44.5%  of 
variance in the dependent variable (partial eta squared 
of 0.445 multiplied by 100). 
The result of students’ vocabulary progress could 
be seen from pre-test and post-test from each group. 
The computation of control group pre-test and post 
test  scores  using  test  of  Between-Subjects  Effect 
showed  that there is significant  difference between 
two groups  in the post test  scores. Meanwhile, the 
result showed that the students in the experimental 
group  achieve  better  result  in  the  post  test.  The 
improvement  was  statistical  significant  if  it  was 
compared  their  pre-test  scores.  The  statistical 
computation results exhibited a significant fact that 
picture is effective in improving students’ vocabulary 
mastery. 
The  computation  of  mean  scores  in  the 
experimental showed that the pre-test score was 84.53 
and after treatment using picture with 50 vocabulary 
was  given  the  post  test  score  was  87.60,    the  
improvement  reached  3.07.    while  in  the  control 
group  the  mean  of  pre-test  was  84.73  and  after 
treatment  using  conventional  method  (read  a  text) 
was given, the post test score was 82.80, it means that 
the post-test score was decreasing 1.93 from the pre-
test. 
4.4  Testing Hypothesis 
For  testing  hypothesis,  the  writer  want  to  know 
whether Ho was accepted or rejected. To  meet the 
hypothesis above,  the statistical analysis of ancova 
was applied  in  this  research to  decide how  far the 
mean of pre-test score is different from the post test 
score; both in group itself and between groups with 
the level of significance of 0.05. The significance of 
the test was analyzed by using computer program 
In  table of  tests of  between-subject  effects  line 
teaching method shows that the value of F-value is 
10.781 and the significant value is 0.002. Thus, it can 
be  concluded  that  both  of  experimental  group  and 
control group different significantly. It means that the 
researcher hypothesis (Hi) is accepted and the (Ho) is 
rejected. Thus,  it is concluded that using picture  is 
more effective than conventional method in teaching 
vocabulary at elementary school. 
5  CONCLUSIONS 
After the researcher gave the pre-test, treatment and 
post-test  to  the  students,  it  is  concluded  that  the 
students  who  taught  using  picture  have  better 
vocabulary  than  the  students  who  taught  without 
picture  (conventional  teaching).  But,  to  reach  the 
purpose  of  this  research,  we  must  give  all  the 
vocabularies  (the  words  about  countable  and 
uncountable noun) to the students, because it will give 
influence  in  students’  post-test.  So  it  made  the 
teaching  is  more  effective  in  teaching  vocabulary. 
They  teaching  vocabulary  using  picture  will  be 
success  if  the  researcher  is  required  to  follow  the 
general specific procedures, such as: specifying the 
topic, defining the students’ group and pairs and the 
rules to treatment. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
I  would  like  to  thanks  to  God  “Allah  SWT”  for 
blessing and mercy and Rector of Kadiry University, 
so this Research can be finally finished. I get idea on 
conducting this Research to fullfill the requirement 
for the International Journal presented by Kanjuruhan 
University. 
REFERENCES 
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., Razavich, A., 2002. 
Introduction  to  Research  in  Education,  Wadsworth 
Group. United States of America. 
Brown, H. D., 2004. Language assessmentPrinciples  and 
Classroom activities, Pearson Education. Inc. U.S.A. 
Brown, H. D., 2007. Teaching by principles: an interactive 
Approach to Language Pedagogy, San Fransisco State 
University. U. S. A. 
Gerlach,  V.  S.,  Ely,  P.,  1980.  Teachingand  Media:  A 
Systematic Approach, Prentice Hall. New Jersey. 
Nagaraj, G., 1996. English Lanuage Teaching: Approaches, 
Methods,  and  Technique,  Orient  Longman,  Ltd. 
London. 
Suyanto, K. K. E., 2007. English for Young Learners, Bumi 
Aksara. Jakarta. 
  
The Effectiveness of Using Picture to Teach Vocabulary at Elementary School
371