
 
Trianto (2008) states that the contextual approach is a 
concept  that  helps  teachers  learn  the  link  between 
what is taught with real-world situations students and 
encourage students to make connections between the 
knowledge possessed by the application of their lives 
as members of the family and society. Based on the 
understanding  of  contextual  approach  can  be 
concluded that the contextual approach lead students 
to learn from the knowledge they get and connected 
in  everyday  life.  Contextual  learning  emphasizes 
students  to  learn  in  their  entirety  so  that  the 
information  and  knowledge  that  students  have 
encountered  can  be  absorbed  well  and  last  a  long 
time.  With  this  concept,  the  expected  learning 
outcomes more meaningful for students. The learning 
process takes place naturally in the form of students 
work  activities  and  experience,  not  a  transfer  of 
knowledge  from  teacher  to  student.  Learning 
strategies more important than learning outcomes. 
2  RESEARCH METHODS 
Development models used in developing the thematic 
teaching  materials  of  Elementary  School  in  fourth 
grade  Subtheme  Hidup  Rukun  is  Borg  and  Gall 
Model. According to Borg and Gall (1983) Research 
and Development (Research  and  Development) is  a 
process used to develop and validate the products that 
will be developed. 
Method  of  research  and  development  includes 
several  phases:  research  and  information  gathering, 
planning,  development  of  an  early  draft  of  the 
product, testing experts that media experts, linguists, 
experts  learning  technology  and  expert  thematic, 
revision  expert  testing,  trials  and  small-scale  field 
trials 
This  research  was  conducted  at  five  primary 
schools in Tulungagung  that  implement Curriculum 
2013  class  IV  Subtheme  Rukun  Life  in  The 
Community,  it  took  place  in  SDN  I  Campurdarat, 
SDN I Boyolangu, SDN I Pucungkidul, SDN I Beji, 
and SDN I  Sobontoro. The  samples in this research 
was  grade  IV  selected  by  purposive  sampling.  The 
design  used  in  this  research  is  pretest  and  posttest 
design.  
According Sugiyono (2014: 111) the structure of 
the design of this research as follows: 
 
 
 
 
Figure 1: Research Design Pretest-Posttest. 
Explanation: O₁ = Score Pretest (before the use of 
teaching materials), O₂ = Score Posttest (after the use 
of teaching materials), x = treatment with contextual-
based teaching materials. 
The  data  in this  research  was  obtained  from the 
pretest and posttest scores were analyzed statistically 
with  Paired  Samples  T-Test.  The  qualitative  data 
obtained from the results of observations, interviews, 
and student activity during the learning process were 
analyzed and explained descriptively. 
3  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 
Teaching  materials  was  validated  by  expert  media, 
expert  thematic  learning,  teachers  as  practitioners, 
and  students  to  determine  the  attractiveness  of  the 
teaching  materials.  Assessment  carried  out  by  the 
expert content aspect of thematic learning and Social 
Sciences  who  received  a  score  of  89.63%  and 
84.75%.  Design  materials  judged  by  media  experts 
which its score was 73.33%, practitioners assess the 
feasibility  of  teaching  materials  which  scored 
94.98%,  while  the  attractiveness  of  the  material 
showed  a  score  of  89.15%.  Results  of  student 
questionnaire  responses  to  determine  the 
attractiveness of the teaching materials once used by 
86.5% of students showed achievement criteria very 
feasible  and  can  be  implemented.  Students  also 
provide suggestions and comments related to the use 
of  teaching  materials.  Student  comments  and 
suggestions as follows: (1) contextual based teaching 
materials  easy  for  me  to  learn,  (2)  the  my  score 
becomes better using the teaching materials, (3) I love 
to learn about Tulungagung. It can be concluded that 
the  field  trials,  students  very  interested  in  using 
contextual-based thematic teaching materials. 
On the activity of students in using the materials 
showed that only 12 students who obtain an average 
score below 80%, while 131 students grades average 
above 80%. Activities of students when working on 
sheet  student  activity  has  a  percentage of  91.6%.  It 
can be concluded that the criteria of student activity 
was in very active category. 
In testing these materials besides to see the score 
of student activity in doing of teaching materials, the 
researchers also see the results of student learning by 
providing  evaluation  questions  at  the  end  of  sub-
themes. Based on the data obtained from the results 
of student learning that students who have rated 91-
100 as many as 42 students or 29.38%. Then students 
who received grades 81-90 as many as 89 students or 
62.24%. While as many as 9 students or 6.29% gain 
value range 71-80. And 3 students or 2.09% scored 
Contextual Based Development of Teaching Materials Subtheme Rukun Life in the Community
91