3.1.3  The Impact of Cone Radius on the 
Antenna Performance 
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
S11 (dB)
Freq. (GHz)
 3mm
 4mm
 5mm
 6mm
 7mm
 
Figure 4: S11 versus frequency for varying antenna length. 
35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
S11 (dB)
Freq. (GHz)
 0.5mm
 0.6mm
 0.7mm
 0.8mm
 0.9mm
 
Figure 5: S11 versus frequency for varying dipole gap. 
Here  the  antenna  length  and  the  dipole  gap  are 
set  as  4mm  and  0.7mm  respectively.  And  the  cone 
radius  of  the  dipole  is  changed  from  0.1mm  to 
0.7mm.  In  Fig.  6,  with  cone  radius  increasing, 
reflection  coefficient  (S11)  of  resonant  frequency 
point  decreases  first  and  then  increases.  When  the 
cone radius of the dipole is 0.5mm, the efficiency of 
the antenna is highest. 
According  to  above  simulation,  when  antenna 
length,  the  dipole  gap  and  cone  radius  are  4mm, 
0.7mm and 0.5mm respectively, the performance of 
antenna  is  best.  However,  compared  with  ideal 
antenna  shown in  Fig.  2,  the performance of above 
antenna has huge  difference from the one we need. 
Its resonant characteristic is too prominent. 
3.2  Simulation and Design for loaded 
Dipole Antennas 
According to antenna theory and above analysis, the 
bandwidth  of  the  dipole  with  pure  metal  is  very 
narrow.  Its  resonant  characteristic  is  prominent. 
While  loaded  antennas  have  flatter  frequency 
response  and  wider  bandwidth.  Therefore,  loaded 
antennas  are  used  to  improve  the  performance  of 
antennas in probes (Yang et al., 2014). 
In  last  section  we  know  that  the  impact  of 
antenna length on resonant frequency is obvious, so 
the  length  and  the  loaded  surface  resistance  are 
mainly  changed  to  optimize  the  performance  of 
antennas in this section. Here the dipole gap and  
30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50
-24
-20
-16
-12
-8
-4
0
S11 (dB)
Freq. (GHz)
 0.3mm
 0.4mm
 0.5mm
 0.6mm
 0.7mm
 
Figure 6: S11 versus frequency for varying cone radius. 
cone radius are set  as  the optimal results which are 
0.7mm  and  0.5mm,  and  the  substrate  material  of 
dipoles  is  aluminium-oxide  (Al
2
O
3
).  In  the  loaded 
antenna  design,  the  resistance  and  the  excitation 
probably have poor  contact  when  the dielectric  and 
the  excitation  are  directly  connected.  So  a  sheet 
metal  (gold)  with  0.1-mm  thickness  is  added 
between the dielectric and the excitation. 
3.2.1  Optimization for Antenna Length 
First,  we  optimize  the  length  of  loaded  antenna.  In 
the  process,  based  on  that  free  space  intrinsic 
impedance is  377Ω,  the surface resistance of  single 
arm  of  the  dipole  is  set  as  400Ω  (Kraus,  2011). 
Meanwhile, antenna length is changed from 3mm to 
30mm. From the simulation results in Fig. 7, we can 
know that short loaded antennas have low efficiency, 
especially  in  the  range  of  1-30GHz.  Then,  the 
efficiency  becomes  high  and  the  flatness  becomes 
good  by  increasing  antenna  length.  And  the  25mm 
loaded dipole antenna has the best performance. 
3.2.2  Optimization for Surface Resistance 
In  order  to  obtain  the  optimal  loaded  antenna,  the 
surface  resistance  is  changed  in  this  section. 
Antenna length is set as optimal value, 25mm. Fig. 8 
depict  the  frequency  response  with  different 
resistance.  First,  we  change  the  resistance  around 
400Ω, as shown in Fig. 8(a). It can be seen that there 
are  several  resonance  points  within  1-40GHz,  and 
resonance  characteristic  becomes  weak  by 
increasing resistance. Then, we continue to increase 
resistance.  Fig.  8(b)  shows  that  the  efficiency 
becomes  low  within  the  range  of  1-30GHz  and 
becomes  high  within  the  range  of  30-40GHz  when 
the  resistance  increases.  And  now  the  trend  of  S11 
curves is close to the ideal antenna.