Figure  6:  Tombak  Sulu-sulu,  Aek  Sipangolu, 
Sisingamangaraja Palace 
The  application  of  the  Batak  Culture  is  also 
needed in the preservation of tourist objects located 
in  Geopark  Bakara  tourist  sites.  The  use  of 
ornamental  plants  can  also  be  applied  in  Geopark 
Bakara. These plants can be used one of them for the 
benefit  of  tourism. A  row  of  ornamental  plants  can 
complement  the  shrub  trees  around  the  location  of 
Bakara tourism objects. The use of ornamental plants 
is one of the efforts in environmental preservation can 
also improve the economy and welfare of ornamental 
plant farmers in the Bakara area. 
5  CONCLUSIONS 
Sipiso-Piso Waterfall, seen from the land use is good 
enough. The three elements of land use, namely land 
use  intensity,  land  function,  and  relationships 
between functions are quite good. However, even so 
there  are  still  some  deficiencies  in  these  three 
elements. In the element of land use intensity because 
there is no land use plan, there are some unplanned 
viewpoint  developments.  In  the  element  of  land 
function,  there  is  still  an  important  function  in  the 
geotourism area which is not owned by Sipiso-Piso 
Waterfall, namely Stoppoint and information centers 
and  irregular  parking  spaces.  In  the  element  of 
relationship  between  functions,  circulation  for 
pedestrian  pathways  is  still  not  good  and  adequate. 
Therefore, this paper provides the concept of land use 
planning  to  address  these  problems.  Unfortunately, 
not  all  problems  can  be  solved  by  conceptualizing 
land  use  planning,  such  as  the  problem  of  less 
representative  building  design  and  less  geotourism 
activities  that  cannot  be  resolved.  Therefore,  the 
author  recommends  a  study  of  other  tourism  area 
planning  elements  in  the  Sipiso-Piso  Waterfall 
geotourism area to complete this research. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
The authors thankfully that the research is supported 
by Universitas Sumatera Utara. The support is under 
the  research  grant  of  number 
252/UN5.2.3.1/PPM/KP-DRPM/2018  Year  2018., 
and  this  research  also  supported  by  Sustainable 
tourism  working  Group  of  Universitas  Sumatera 
Utara. 
REFERENCES 
N. Ginting and J. Wahid, “Recalling the Past: Maintaining 
continuity in urban heritage tourism,” J. ASIAN Behav. 
Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81–89, 2016. 
J.-P. Pralong, “A method for assessing tourist potential and 
use of geomorphological sites,” Géomorphologie Reli. 
Process. Environ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 189–196, 2005. 
N. Ginting and N. V. Rahman, “Maimoon Palace Heritage 
District  in  Medan,  Indonesia:  What  we  preserve  and 
why we preserve?,” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci., vol. 
222, pp. 332–341, 2016. 
H.  Shirvani,  The urban design process.  Van  Nostrand 
Reinhold Company, 1985. 
C.  Goodwin,  J.  M.  Ingham,  and  G.  Tonks,  “Identifying 
heritage value in URM buildings,” 2009. 
R.  K.  Dowling,  “Geotourism’s  Global  Growth,” 
Geoheritage, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2011. 
N. Azman, S. A. Halim, O. P. Liu, S. Saidin, and I. Komoo, 
“Public education in heritage conservation for geopark 
community,”  Procedia-Social Behav. Sci.,  vol.  7,  pp. 
504–511, 2010. 
Ginting,  N.,  &  Sasmita,  A.  (2018).  Developing  tourism 
facilities  based  on  geotourism  in  Silalahi  Village, 
Geopark  Toba  Caldera.  In  IOP Conference Series: 
Earth and Environmental Science  (Vol.  126). 
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012163 
  Ginting,  N.,  &  Febriandy,  F.  (2018).  Implementation  of 
geotourism  concept  in  developing  natural  tourist