
case, some students failed to illustrate the interaction 
and conflict among the characters. This finding is also 
in line with the research from Correa and Domínguez 
(2014)  clarifying  that  problem  of  the  use  of  the 
Theme  is  also  experienced  by  their  student.  In 
addition,  there  are  only  two  interpersonal  Themes 
discovered  in  the  text  namely  sometimes  and 
suddenly. 
The  pedagogical  implementation  related  to  the 
findings is the lecturers should give materials about 
vocative use and adjunct to the university students in 
writing class.  The vocative use such as my darling, 
my  father,  Toba,  Cinderella,  and  also  comment 
adjuncts  such  as  surprisingly,  and  fortunately,  are 
possible to be placed in the text to have a better set 
for the events or conflicts to be told. 
5  CONCLUSION AND 
SUGGESTIONS 
After the data have been analyzed, the conclusion can 
be  drawn  that  all  three  types  of  Theme  (topical, 
interpersonal,  and  textual)  appear  in  the  data  and 
topical  Theme  is  the  dominant  Theme  (725  or 
66.76%) characterizing university students’ narrative 
texts.  The  pedagogical  implementation  is  some 
students  are  not  successful  in  presenting  the 
interaction  among  characters  so  that  the  lecturers 
should give more materials on the use of interpersonal 
theme  markers  such  as  vocative  and  comment 
adjuncts in teaching narrative text. 
It is also suggested that the  lecturers give extra 
material and practice to students in writing this genre 
specifically  in  thematic  realization.  Then,  students 
should pay attention  more on the use of  Theme  in 
their writing since it affects their quality of writing. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
The writers would like to express their gratitude to 
Research Institute of Universitas Sumatera Utara for 
2018  TALENTA  research  grant  no: 
2590/UN5.1.R/PPM/2017  on  16th  March  2018. 
Then, the thankfulness is also addressed to English 
literature  department,  faculty  of  cultural  sciences, 
Universitas Sumatera Utara which provided so much 
help and kindness during the accomplishment of this 
research. 
 
REFERENCES 
Agusta,  D  2015,  Improving  students’  ability  in  writing 
narrative  texts  using  short  animated  stories  at  class 
VIII c of SMPN 2 Sanden, Bantul in the academic year 
of  2013/2014,  thesis, Yogyakarta, Universitas Negeri 
Yogyakarta, viewed 10 June 2018. 
Anderson, K & Anderson, M 2004, Text types in English 2, 
The Modern Art Production Group, Kuala Lumpur. 
Butt, D, Fahey, R, Feez, S, Spinks, S & Yallop, C 2006, 
Using  functional  grammar:  an  explorer’s  guide, 
National  Center  for  English  language  Teaching  and 
Research Macquarie University, Sydney. 
Cohen,  L,  Manion,  L  &  Morrison,  K  2007,  Research 
methods in education, 6th edn, Routledge, New York.  
Correa, D & Domínguez, C 2014, ‘Using SFL as a tool for 
analyzing  students’  narratives’,  HOW,  A  Colombian 
Journal for Teachers of English, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 112-
133,  viewed  10  June  2018, 
dx.doi.org/10.19183/how.21.2.7. 
De Oliveira, LC 2015, ‘A systemic-functional analysis of 
English  language  learners’  writing’,  D.E.L.T.A.,  vol. 
31,  no.  1,  pp.  207-237,  viewed  10  June  2018, 
dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-4450364601799092306. 
Ebrahimi,  SF  &  Ebrahimi,  SJ  2012,  ‘Markedness  in 
writing: a case of EFL students’, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 773-
777, viewed 10 June 2018,  doi:10.4304/tpls.2.4.773-
777. 
Eggins,  S  2004,  An  introduction  to  systemic  functional 
linguistics, Continuum, New York. 
Eliya, KR 2015, Improving students’ skills of writing short 
version of narrative texts by using comic strips for the 
eleventh grade of science class of MAN Yogyakarta II 
in the academic year of 2012/2013, thesis,  Yogyakarta, 
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta,  viewed 10 June 2018.  
Ezzy,  D  2002,  Qualitative  analysis:  practice  and 
innovation, National Library of Australia, New South 
Wales. 
Gerot, L & Wignell, P 1994, Making sense of functional 
grammar,  Antipodean  Educational  Enterprises,  New 
South Wales. 
Halliday,  MAK  1985,  An  introduction  to  functional 
grammar, Arnold, London. 
Halliday,  MAK  1994,  An  introduction  to  functional 
grammar, 2nd edn, Arnold, London. 
Halliday,  MAK  &  Matthiessen,  CMIM  2014,  An 
introduction  to  functional  grammar,  4th  edn, 
Routledge, London. 
Hanafiah,  R,  Yusuf,  M  &  Aswani,  A  2018,  ‘Theme 
markedness in EFL students’ recount texts: a systemic 
functional  analysis’,  Southeast  Asia  Language 
Teaching and Learning (SALTEL) Journal, vol. 1, no. 
1, pp. 14-20, viewed 11 June 2018. 
Thematic Realization in University Students’ Narrative Text: Systemic Functional Perspective
1265