Analysis of Effect of Religiusity on Change

Social Community in the Environmental Security

Yabes Ton

Student of Graduate School of Religious Education

Keywords: Religiusity Confidence dimension, Dimension of worship Dimension of Consumption or Consequences,

Dimensions of knowledge, Dimension of Living, Social Change

Abstract: Hirschman says that human boredom is actually the cause of change. According to Glock & Stark (in Ancok

& Suroso, 2001) the dimensions of religiosity consist of five kinds: The dimension of belief, is an ideological

dimension that gives an image of the advantages of which one accepts the dogmatic things of its religion. The

dimension of religious worship or practice is a ritual dimension, in which a person carries out his religious

ritual obligations; The dimensions of the direction of the guides on the state of a person behaving motivated

by his religious teachings, namely how individuals relate to their world, especially with other human beings.

The dimension of knowledge, referring to the knowledge of learning, teaching about teaching, the study of

religion, the greetings contained in the scriptures; Dimension of appreciation, pointing to experiences and

experiences of feelings and experiences. The method used is quantitative method. The population of this study

is the entire head of the family who are members of the organization of worship and the number of samples

in this study 80 youth and head of the family. The sampling technique is purposive sampling. The results

obtained are for instrument test. For test of data principle. Test heterokedastisitas. For Hypothesis test,

partially (t test) and simultaneously (F test) there is significant influence between belief dimension, .;

Dimension of worship Dimensions of practice or consequence, Dimensions of knowledge, Dimension of

appreciation, to Social Change Society On Worship Environment. The conclusion is that there is Influence of

Religiosity on Social Change of Society on Worship Environment.

1 INTRODUCTION

Social change is the changes that occur in social

institutions in a society that affects their social

systems, including values, social attitudes, and

behavioral patterns among groups in society. Social

change in society is not a product or product but a

process. Social change is a collective decision taken

by community members. The concept of group

dynamics becomes an interesting subject for

understanding social change.

Social change is a process in which there is a

change in the structure and function of a social

system. These changes occur as a result of the entry

of ideas of updates adopted by members of the social

system concerned. According to Comte (Setiady,

2006: 26)

The usual process of social change consists of

three stages:

a. Invention, the process by which new ideas

are created and developed

b. Diffusion, ie the process by which new ideas

are communicated into the social system.

c. Consequences, ie changes occurring within

the social system as a result of adoption or

rejection of innovation. Changes occur if the

use or rejection of the new idea has a result.

Not all social phenomena that cause change can be

regarded as social change, the symptoms that can lead

to social change have characteristics such as:

a. Every society will not stop growing because

they experience changes either slow or fast.

b. Changes that occur in certain social

institutions will be followed by changes in

other social institutions.

c. Rapid social change can lead to temporary

disorganization as a process of self-

adjustment.

d. Change is not limited by the field of material

or the spiritual realm because both have a

strong reciprocal relationship.

Ton, Y.

Analysis of Effect of Religiusity on Change Social Community in the Environmental Security.

DOI: 10.5220/0010045304870492

In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Computer, Environment, Agriculture, Social Science, Health Science, Engineering and Technology (ICEST 2018), pages 487-492

ISBN: 978-989-758-496-1

487

Humans are individual beings who can not escape

from relationships with other human beings. As a

result of the relationships that occur between

individuals (humans) then social groups are born

(social group) based on common interest equality.

But that does not mean all the human set can be said

social group. To say the social group there are certain

requirements. In a social group that has been

composed of the society will be a change in the

arrangement is a necessity. Because change is an

absolute thing everywhere.

According to Glock & Stark (in Ancok & Suroso,

2001) the dimensions of religiosity consist of five

kinds: the dimension of belief, an ideological

dimension that gives an idea of the extent to which a

person accepts the dogmatic things of his religion;

The dimension of religious worship or practice is a

ritual dimension, ie the extent to which a person

carries out his religious ritual obligations; The

dimension of practice or consequence, refers to how

a person's level behaves motivated by his religious

teachings, namely how individuals relate to their

world, especially with other human beings. This

dimension includes the behavior of helping,

cooperating, giving charity, upholding justice and

truth, being honest, forgiving, not stealing, obeying

Islamic norms in sexual behavior, striving for a

successful life in Islam, etc. Dimensions of

knowledge point to how one's knowledge of the

teachings of his religion, especially of the central

teachings of his religion, as contained in his

scriptures; Dimension of appreciation, points to how

far a person is in feeling and experiencing religious

feelings and experiences

2 PROBLEM FORMULATION

The formulation of the problem is a fundamental part

and is the first step of a research activity. The

formulation of the problem should be adjusted to the

title of the study because the problem becomes the

basis for further discussion.

Based on the above description, the researcher

formulates the following issues:

a. Does the belief dimension partially have

significant effect on the Social Change of

Society in the Worship Area in X area?

b. Does the Dimension of worship partially have

a significant effect on the Social Change of

Society in the Worship Area in X area?

c. Does the Dimension of partial implementation

significantly affect the Social Change of

Society in the Worship Area in the X Region?

d. Is the Dimension of knowledge partially

significant effect on Social Change of Society

on Worship Environment in region X

e. Does the Dimension of partial appreciation

have a significant effect on the Social Change

of Society in the Worship Area in X Region?

f. Is Religiusity (Dimension of belief,

Dimension of worship, Dimension of

knowledge, Dimension of knowledge,

Dimension of appreciation) simultaneously

have a significant effect on Social Change

Society in the Worship Area in region X?

3 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study are:

a. To know whether the dimension of belief

partially significant effect on Social Change

Society in the Worship Environment in the

region X

b. To find out whether the Dimensions of

worship partially significant effect on Social

Change Society on the Environment of

Worship in the region X

c. To know whether the Dimension of partial

implementation significantly influences the

Social Change of Society in the Worship

Environment in the region X

d. To find out whether the knowledge dimension

partially significant effect on Social Change of

Society on Worship Environment in region X

e. To find out whether the Dimension of

appreciation partially significant effect on

Social Change Society in the Worship

Environment in the region X

f. To find out whether Religiusity (Dimension of

belief, Dimension of worship, Dimension of

knowledge, Dimension of knowledge,

Dimension of appreciation) simultaneously

have a significant effect on Social Change of

Society in Worship Area in area X

4 THEORETICAL STUDIES /

CONCEPTS SOCIAL CHANGE

Every human being during life must undergo

changes. Changes can be either limited or

widespread, slow changes and fast-changing changes.

Changes can be about social values and norms,

patterns of organizational behavior, organizational

structure, layers in society, power and authority,

ICEST 2018 - 3rd International Conference of Computer, Environment, Agriculture, Social Science, Health Science, Engineering and

Technology

488

social interaction and so on. Changes that occur in the

community is a normal symptom. Its influence can

spread rapidly to other parts of the world thanks to

modern communication (Soekanto, 2009: 259).

According to Wibert (in Ranjabar 2008: 15) argues

that "social change is not a symptom of modern

society but a universal thing in the experience of

human life. In line with Soekanto's opinion (2007:

267) social change can be known by the presence of

certain traits: a). The absence of a community that

stops its development because every society

experiences changes that are slow or fast; b). Changes

that occur in certain social institutions will be

imitated by changes in other social institutions

because of social institutions it is interpendent then it

is very difficult to isolate changes in certain social

institutions only. The initial process and the

subsequent processes are a link; c). Rapid changes

usually result in a temporary organization because it

is in the process.

4.1 Religiosity

According to Gazalba (in Ghufron, 2012) religiosity

comes from the religious word in Latin "religio"

whose root is religure which means binding. Thus, it

implies that religion or religion in general has rules

and obligations that must be obeyed and implemented

by adherents. All of which serves to bind a person or

a group of people in relation to God, fellow human

beings, and the natural surroundings. Ancok and

Suroso (2001) define religiosity as meaningful

diversity encompassing various sides or dimensions

that not only occur when a person performs a ritual

act, but also performs other activities driven by

supernatural powers. The source of the religious soul

is the absolute sense of dependence, the fear of threats

from the natural environment and the human

conviction about its limitations and weaknesses. This

absolute sense of dependence enables human beings

to seek the powerful power of the surroundings which

can be used as a protective force in their life with a

power outside themselves that is God.

4.2 The Dimensions of Religiosity

According to Glock & Stark (in Ancok & Suroso,

2001) the dimensions of religiosity consists of five

kinds: a). The dimension of belief, is an ideological

dimension that gives an idea of the extent to which a

person accepts the dogmatic things of his religion. In

Islam, the belief dimension concerns the faith belief

in God, the Angels, the Apostles, the books of God,

heaven and hell; b). The dimension of religious

worship or practice is a ritual dimension, ie the extent

to which one carries out the ritual obligations of its

Religion; c). The dimension of practice or

consequence, refers to the degree to which a person

behaves motivated by his religious teachings; d). The

dimension of knowledge refers to the extent of one's

knowledge of the teachings of his religion, especially

of the central teachings of his religion, as contained

in his scriptures: e). Dimension of appreciation,

pointing to how far a person's level in feeling and

experiencing feelings and religious experiences; f)

Method, the method used is quantitative method. The

population of this study were all heads of families and

youth who were members of the worship organization

and the number of samples in this study amounted to

80 youth and the head of the family. The sampling

technique is purposive sampling. Data analysis is

done by multiple linear regression analysis that is to

know the steering between five independent variable

with dependent variable.

5 THE RESULTS OF THE

ANALYSIS

After passing the instrument validity and reliability

test, all question items have been qualified for use in

research. As for all data have met the results of the

classical assumption test that is normality test,

Multicolinearity Test and Heterkodasticity Test.

Based on the sample data with 80 respondents, the

following scores were obtained: theoretical score

between 25 to 58; mean of 45.55; median of 48.00;

and the standard deviation of 11,058. In proving the

tendency of the dimension value of belief (X1) the

researcher in this case establishes 3 (three) categories

(k) namely: (a) Height; (b) Medium; (c). Low. Based

on the results of statistical test descriptive to

Externalization Values (X1) found the interval of:

Range divided by category 33: 3 = 11 Based on these

findings can be made table category and position

Confidence dimension (X1) is the interval 43.09-

48.01 with Medium category.

Based on sample data with 80 respondents, the

following scores were obtained: theoretical score

between 23 to 59; mean of 45.48; median of 47.00;

and standard deviation of 11,621. The overall picture

is like the table below. In proving the tendency of

Dimension of worship (X2) the researcher in this case

establishes 3 (three) categories (k) namely: (a)

Height; (b) Medium; (c) Low. Based on the results of

descriptive statistical tests of revitalization variables

Dimensions of worship (X2) found the interval of:

Analysis of Effect of Religiusity on Change Social Community in the Environmental Security

489

Range divided by category 36: 3 = 12. Based on the

findings can be made table category and position

Dimension of worship (X2) is in the interval 42.89-

48.06 with the category

Based on sample data with 80 respondents, the

following scores were obtained: theoretical score

between 25 to 59; mean of 45.68; median of 47.50;

and a standard deviation of 11,258. The overall

picture is like the table below. In prove the tendency

of Dimension of practice (X3), the researcher in this

case specifies 3 (three) categories (k) namely: (a)

Height; (b) Medium; (c) Low. Based on the results of

descriptive statistical tests of the variables Dimension

of practice (X3), found the interval of: Range divided

by category 34: 3 = 11.3 rounding 11. Based on the

findings can be made table category and position

Dimension of practice (X3), is in interval 43.17-

48.18 with Medium category

Based on the sample data with 80 respondents, the

following scores were obtained: theoretical score

between 25 to 58; mean of 45.55; median of 49.50;

and the standard deviation of 11,023. The overall

picture is like the table below. In proving the

tendency of Dimension of knowledge (X4), the

researcher in this case establishes 3 (three) categories

(k) namely: (a) Height; (b) Medium; (c) Low. Based

on the result of descriptive statistic test on the variable

of knowledge dimension (X4), the interval is found

as: Range divided by category 33: 3 = 11. Based on

the findings can be made table and position category

Dimension knowledge (X4) is in interval 43.10-

48.00 with Medium category

Based on sample data with 80 respondents, the

following scores were obtained: theoretical score

between 25 to 59; mean of 45.53; median of 47.50;

and a standard deviation of 11,614. The overall

picture is like the table below. In proving the

tendency Dimension of appreciation (X5) researchers

in this case set 3 (three) categories (k) namely: (a)

High; (b) Medium; (c) Low. Based on the results of

descriptive statistical tests of the variables Dimension

knowledge (X4) found the interval of: Range divided

by category 36: 3 = 12. Based on these findings can

be made table category and position Dimension of

appreciation (X5) is in the interval 42.94-48.11 with

Medium category

Based on sample data with 80 respondents, the

following scores were obtained: theoretical score

between 14 to 31; mean of 24.38; median of 25.50;

and a standard deviation of 5,982. The overall picture

is like the table below. In proving the tendency of

Social Change (Y)), the researcher in this case

establishes 3 (three) categories (k) namely: (a) High;

(b) Medium; (c) Low. Based on the results of

statistical test descriptive of Social Variables

variables found in the interval of: Range divided by

category 17: 3 = 5.6 Rounding 6. Based on these

findings can be made table category and position of

Social Change Society in the interval 23.04- 25.71

with Medium category

Table 1: Regression Analysis Results

Model Summary

Model

Square

Adjusted R

Square

Std. Error of

the Estimate

.816

.666 .656

1.995

a. Predictors: (Constant), Confidence dimension (X1),

Dimension of worship (X2), Dimension of practice (X3),

Dimension of knowledge (X4) and Dimension of appreciation

(X5)

Based on the above table, found the value of ryx,

amounted to 0, 816 and positive value which means,

the magnitude relationship between independent

variables with dependent variable is 0, 816 with very

strong category. From result of analysis also obtained

value of ryx2 (coefficient of determination) equal to

0,666 or 66,0%. This means that the contribution of

independent variable variable (with dependent

variable of Social Social Change (Y) is 66% while the

rest of 34% is explained by other causes outside the

research model.

Table 2: Test of significance

Coefficients

Model

Unstandardized

Coefficients

t Sig. B

Std.

Error

1 (Constant)

3.991 .986 4.047 .000

.660 .088 7.506 .000

.117 .113 1.936 .004

.006 .004 4.683 .006

011 .002 5.321 .000

.117 .113 1.936 .004

a) Dependent Variable: Social Change (Y)

Source: Processed data (2018)

When viewed from the table above, obtained t value

of 7.506, 1.936, 4.683, 5.321 and 1.936 and was very

significant at α <0.05. The dimensions of faith (X1),

Dimension of worship (X2), Dimension of practice

(X3), Dimension of knowledge (X4) and Dimension

of appreciation (X5) have significant effect to Social

Change (Y) at α <0.05. The linear regression line

equation is generated Ŷ = 3.991 + 0.660 X1 + 0,

ICEST 2018 - 3rd International Conference of Computer, Environment, Agriculture, Social Science, Health Science, Engineering and

Technology

490

117X2 + 0.006 X3 + 0.011 X4 + 0.117 X5. That is,

every dimension of faith (X1), Dimension of worship

(X2), Dimension of practice (X3), Dimension of

knowledge (X4) and Dimension of appreciation (X5)

rise then social change also rise

6 DISCUSSION

Social and religious behavior has a very close

relationship and can not be separated from each other.

Because, when doing research on religion, it is almost

inseparable from the use of approaches or framework

methodological social sciences. In this context,

sociologically for example, religion is regarded as

part of the construction of social reality. Thus, social

research if associated with religious research can all

be said to be an empirical research paradigm.

Religion is a guideline of moral behavior, then

religion is the influence of human moral behavior

because it goes into the construction of personality.

The extent to which the effectiveness of the influence

of course depends on which between influence

pengampai influence with the recipient of influence.

Each religion must have rules or commands each

religion that must be obeyed by all followers. And

those rules will affect the behavior or behavior of

followers. However, if in carrying out orders or rules

given by the religion is run only because muddle

obligations then it could be the behavior is not in

accordance with what is desired by religion. Today

there are also many behavior of the followers of

religion that has deviated away from the essence of

the teachings of religion itself. As a result, religion is

transformed into a scary and frightening figure. In

fact, the essence of religious teachings is love and

affection. Currently we do not live in wartime with

weapons as the main tool. We now stand in the era of

openness and democracy. It should be seen that the

attitude of mutual help and spread peace. Can be seen

the difference between a believer with an unbelieving

ornag living his religious life, with a person who does

not practice religion or practice religion in a

nonchalant way to his religion. On the face of a

religious person, inward tranquility, his attitude and

his actions will not be miserable or troublesome to

others, as is the case with a person whose life is

detached from religious or religious beliefs, his life

will be easily disturbed by the shock of the soul and

the atmosphere. If we want to think deeply religion is

actually as the unifying of the most powerful human

aspirations, some large amount of morality of the

source of society and peace of mind and the

individual as a dignified and that makes human

civilized. There is a lot of accusations that very

menykitkan our ears , they argue that religion is the

source of mpeghambat human progress and

mempepinggi high fanaticism and intolerance,

pegacuan, ignorance, superstition, and wasted, but

such views are very wrong view.

The Culture scholars who have made observations

on various cultures of various nations come to the

conclusion that religion is the most fundamental core

element of human culture, both in terms of positive

and negative. Society is a social phenomenon that is

exposed to a continuous stream of change that can be

divided into two categories: inner (spiritual) and birth

(physical) powers. An example of change caused by

birth powers is the development of technology made

by humans. While examples of changes caused by

inner strength are democracy, reform, and religion.

From comparative analysis it turns out that religion

and religious values are the strongest converting

forces of all cultures, religions can be initiators or

promoters, but also as a persistent opponent in

accordance with the position of religion.

Sociologically, the influence of religion can be seen

from two sides, namely the influence of a positive or

an integrative influence and the influence of a

negative or influence that is destructive and divisive

(desintegrative factor). The social role of religion as

an integrative factor for society means the role of

religion in creating a common bond, both among

members of some societies as well as in social

obligations that help unite them. This is because the

values underlying the social obligation systems are

supported by religious groups so that religion

guarantees consensus in society. Some things that

happen in society due to Religiusity are people

increasingly aware of the importance of attending

worship activities, Willingness to do volunteer work

shows that people want to do things that are not really

his responsibility. Be more aware of the importance

of society, perform other social activities.

7 CONCLUSIONS AND

SUGGESTIONS

Partially (t-test) Confidence dimension Dimension of

worship, Dimension of practice, Dimension of

knowledge and Dimension of appreciation have

significant effect to Social Change at α <0.05. The

correlation of independent variables is Confidence

dimension, Dimension of worship, Dimension of

practice, Dimension of knowledge and Dimension of

Analysis of Effect of Religiusity on Change Social Community in the Environmental Security

491

appreciation with dependent variable of Social

Change Society is 0, 816 with very strong category.

The dimension of faith, Dimension of worship,

Dimension of practice, Dimension of knowledge and

Dimension of appreciation have significant effect on

Social Change at α <0.05. From result of analysis

also obtained value of ryx2 (coefficient of

determination) equal to 0,666 or 66,0%. This means

that the contribution of independent variable is the

belief dimension), Dimension of worship, Dimension

of practice , Dimension of knowledge and Dimension

of appreciation with dependent variable of Social

Change Society. is 66% while the remaining 34% is

explained by other causes outside the research model

It is important to maintain the continuity between the

growth of Religiusity and the Social Change of

Society in the Worship Area, so that the seeds of

conflict and disintegration of the nation can be

minimized and harmony is maintained.

REFERENCES

Abdulsyani, 1992, Sociology of Theory and Applied

Sciences, Jakarta, Earth Script. P. 10-36

Ancok, D and Suroso, F. N. 2001. Islamic Psychology ,.

Yogyakarta: Publisher. Student Library.

Elly M Setiady, Soisla Science and Basic Culture, (Jakarta:

Kencana, 2006) p. 26

Ghufron, N. and Rini R. 2010. Psychological Theories.

Yogyakarta: AR-RUZZ Media.

Ranjabar, Jacobus. 2008. Social Change In Macro Theory

(Social Reality Approach). Bandung: Alfabeta

Ranjabar, 2006, Indonesian Socio-Cultural System, An

Introduction, Ghalia.

Robert M.Z. Lawang, 1985. Introduction to Sociology

Module 4-6, Jakarta, Ministry of Education and Culture

Open University. P. 79

ICEST 2018 - 3rd International Conference of Computer, Environment, Agriculture, Social Science, Health Science, Engineering and

Technology

492