
 
 
Figure 5: The process of regeneration failure. 
 
The  family  arena  affects  the  generation  of 
children in deciding whether to continue or refuse to 
continue  making  pottery.  In  the  old  days,  the 
economic  capital  in  the  pottery  industry  is  quite 
stronger  because  it  becomes  the  main  source  of 
family  livelihood.  Social  capital  among  business 
networks  is  well  maintained.  Both  between 
craftsmen,  traders,  and  suppliers  of  raw  materials. 
The existing cultural capital that time is still strong, 
namely  togetherness  on  helping  production  and 
merger  of  product.  They  believed  that  pottery  is  a 
knowledge that must be passed from one generation 
to  another.  The  symbolic  capital  showed  by  social 
position and class that distinguishes between one unit 
of pottery industry one and another. 
Habitus makes pottery in every family unit into 
the field worthy of being at stake. Therefore, pottery 
is  still considered  important  in the  family,  but  the 
conditions  of  social  domains  and  practices  are 
changing.  External  conditions  in  the  family,  not 
always static. The pottery began to experience crisis, 
the economic capital in each business unit underwent 
a  decline  in  turnover.  Meanwhile,  social  capital 
between crafters, broker, and seller of raw materials 
increasingly  tenuous  due  to  economic  capital. 
Symbolic capital began to change, pottery experience 
degradation because it is seen as a job that does not 
profit. The new orientation of culture makes pottery 
increasingly not firmly held in the family. Because of 
these  conditions,  children  do  not  fully  absorb  the 
culture as a whole (internalization). 
In the generation of children, the capital and the 
habitus  that  is  formed  from  the  family  is  very 
different  from  the  generation  of  parents.  This 
condition  is  also  influenced  by  the  generation  of 
children outside the core family, such as education, 
peers, and social environment of society.Child capital 
in the economic field has more networking power in 
other sectors. Children get more results by pursuing 
other  work.  In  addition,  work  on  other  sectors  is 
considered  more  proud  that  social  capital  in  the 
generation of children is no longer narrow. Culture 
makes  pottery  increasingly  abandoned.  Thus,  the 
pottery  is  no  longer  continued.  The  apparent 
condition of the process is the failure of regeneration. 
4  CONCLUSIONS 
Social  practices  that  occurred  in  the  failure  of 
regeneration of pottery of Paseban Village occurred 
through  changes  in  the  accumulation  of  habitus, 
capital, and field in the community. Nevertheless, the 
use of Bourdieu's social practices does not place an 
important  element  of  time.  Time  is  an  important 
element that can be used to explain the social changes 
that  affect  the  habitus,  capital,  arena.  It  is  even 
possible that the capital and arena undergo changes 
that then affect social habits and practices. 
REFERENCES 
Ali, V. E. 2014. A Critical Survey of the Growth, Decline, 
and  Sustainability  of  Traditional  Pottery  Practice 
among the Igbo of South Eastern Nigeria. The Journal 
of Modern Craft, 7, 123-139.  
Bourdieu P., Wacquant L. 1992. An invitation to reflexive 
sociology. 
Creswell, J.  W. 2007.  Qualitative  Inquiry  and  Research 
Design,  Choosing  Among  Five  Approaches,  Second 
Edition. Sage Publication: USA 
Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. S. 2000. Handbook of Qualitative 
Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 
Grenfell,  M.  2008.  Pierre  Bourdieu  Key  Consepts.  UK: 
Acumen Publishing Limited 
Karnanta,  K.  Y.  2013.  Paradigma  Teori  Arena  Produksi 
Kultural  Sastra:  Kajian  Terhadap  Pemikiran  Pierre 
Bourdieu. Poetika : Jurnal Ilmu Sastra, 1(1).  
Nash,  R.  1990.  Bourdieu  on  Education  and  Social  and 
Cultural Reproduction. British Journal of Sociology of 
Education, 11(4), 431-447.  
Sikdar,  M.,  Pritish  Chaudhuri.  2015.  Pottery  making 
tradition among  the Prajapati  community  of Gujarat, 
India. Eurasian Journal of Anthropology, 6, 1-14.  
Supantono,  W.,  A.  Haldani.  2006.  Identifikasi  Unsur  - 
Unsur Simbolik Pada Gerabah  Tradisional Kasongan 
Dan Bayat 1995 – 2005. Jurnal Reka Cipta. 
E. A. Kosasih, 1982. “Tradisi berburu Pada Lukisan Gua di 
Pulau  Muna  (Sulawesi  Tenggara),  REHPA  I,  1982, 
hlm.1–29. 
Kempers,  A.  J.  Bernett.  1959.  Ancient  Indonesian  Art. 
Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 41. 
The Failure of Regeneration Traditional Pottery Handicraft
583