
 
person.  In  that  family  one  is  raised,  lives,  interacts 
with one another and formation of values, patterns of 
thought,  and  habits.  The  family  also  serves  as  a 
selection of all outside cultures, and the dimensions 
of the child's relationship with his environment. 
Therefore,  the  family  is  a  social  institution  that 
has  multi-function,  in  fostering  and  developing 
interaction among family  members.  The family is  a 
parenting tool for children to learn religious, norms, 
values and customs used in the society. Parenting can 
be  defined  as  the  pattern  of  behavior  that  parents 
apply  to  their  children,  through  direct  or  indirect 
interaction,  whether  it  is  supportive  or  inhibiting 
children, in all exploration and commitment activities 
to achieve their identity status (Ulfiah, 2016). 
The  interaction  between  parents  and  children 
applied  in  the  family  greatly  influence  on  the 
formation of the child's personality. By the interaction 
applied  by  the  parents,  children  will  recognize, 
understand  and  comply  the  norms,  values  used  in 
their society (Hurlock, 1980). 
Every  family  has  different  parenting  style.  This 
nurturing style will affect children to adolescence in 
their growth and development. 
Parenting style is  how parents provide treatment 
in  caring  for  their  children.  The  treatment  is  done 
through a continuous interaction between parent and 
child, until the child becomes an adult.  
Hauser  in  Archer  (1994)  divides  nurturing  into 
two styles: enabling and constraining.  Enabling is an 
open  parenting  style  that  supports  the  child's 
psychosocial  development.  This  is  not  because  the 
nurturing  style  encourages  family  members  to 
express their thoughts and responses. 
This  nurturing  style  has  two  components 
cognitive and affective. Cognitive enabling parenting 
style  includes:  a).  Parents  willing  to  involve  their 
children in problem solving, b). Parents participating 
in the exploration of their child's wishes, c). Parents 
who  give  their  children  the  opportunity  to  express 
their views to other family members. 
Constraining,  on  the  other  hand,  is  a  form  of 
parenting style that is closed and inhibits the child's 
psychosocial  development.  This  nurturing  style  has 
two  components  cognitive  and  affective.  The 
cognitive  style  in  constraining  parenting  covers;  a) 
Parents  not  willing  to  involve  their  children  in 
problem solving, b). Parents not participating in their 
children  curiosity,  and  c).  Parents  who  do  not  give 
their children the opportunity to express their views 
to other family members. The affective components 
are  Parents  who  are  ignorant  to  other  family 
members, and b). Parents overestimating other family 
members. 
When looking at each component of the parenting 
style, it can be understood that basically both forms 
of parental treatment can be positioned on the positive 
side (enabling) and negative (constraining).  
In that connection, there are some researchers who 
have  done  research  using  an  enabling-constraining 
parenting  style  in  relation  to  the  development  of 
healthy  teen  personality.  They  have  managed  to 
identify  teenagers  who  are  raised  in  a  family  that 
applies  enabling  parenting  styles  to  show  a  high 
psychological development score (without specifying 
the aspect of psychological development). Compared 
to  those  raised  in  constraining  parenting  style 
(Steinberg, 1993). 
Research  conducted  by  Darmawan  and  Endang 
(2016), attempts to test several hypotheses: (1) there 
are  different  styles,  dimensions,  and  identity  status 
between  boys and  girls;  (2)  there are  differences  in 
style,  dimensions,  and  identity  status  between  the 
early, middle, and late teens; (3) there is a relationship 
between identity styles (informative, normative, and 
delay-dodge)  and  the  dimensions  of  identity 
(commitment, in-depth exploration, and commitment 
review);  and  (4)  there  is  a  relationship  between 
identity  style  (informative,  normative,  and  delay-
dodge)  and  identity  status  (diffusion,  foreclosure, 
moratorium and achievement). 
In  the  midst  of  the  progress  of  science  and 
technology  increasingly  rapidly  influenced  by  the 
current reform era, the challenge for the development 
of aspects of human life will be felt even harder for 
the development of a healthy individual personality, 
the process of a long development, even has started 
since  someone  is  born.  In  connection  with  the 
development of a healthy personality, Erikson (1980) 
has developed a theoretical framework better known 
as the theory of psychosocial development stages.  
Erikson (1968) offers eight stages of psychosocial 
development,  the  stages  contain  conflict  between  2 
(two)  outcomes  (outcomes).  These  conflicts  are 
nothing  but  social  crises  or  major  developmental 
problems which are then referred to as the stages in 
question. If the conflict is successfully resolved in a 
constructive  and  satisfactory  manner,  then  positive 
qualities  will  penetrate  into  the  ego  that  will 
ultimately  enable  the  individual  to  achieve  healthy 
development.  But  if  the  conflict  is  not  resolved  or 
imperfectly resolved, then the developing ego will be 
threatened  given  the  negative  qualities  will  be 
absorbed into the structure of individual personality. 
One of the phases of psychosocial development that 
is  seen  as  a  key  to  achieving  healthy  personality 
development  is  the  conflict  between  Identity  vs. 
Identity  Diffusion  that  is  chronologically  on-going 
ICSE 2017 - 2nd International Conference on Sociology Education
418