
 
partial to one certain political party or corporation in 
the form of support and policy. They also identify a 
factual threat  in which the  actor tries to  change  or 
reform  policy  conceptively,  criminally  and 
politically.  The  state  actor:  United  States  of 
America,  China,  and  Saudi  Arabian.  Non-State 
Actor: Indonesian investor from non-native class (9 
dragons), Syria group, NH/HTI. 
Economic  issue  can  be  seen  as  a  challenge, 
threat,  constraint  and  disruption  against  a  nation’s 
economic  sustainability  essentially  indicated  with 
production factor and its processing, particularly in 
the sectors affecting many people’s life mastered by 
foreigners.  The  students  identify  that  Indonesian 
economic  politics  today  leads  to  capitalism  and 
liberalism thereby leading to the utilization of non-
renewable natural resource thereby resulting in more 
natural  damage.  The  factual  threat  arising today  is 
the  foreign  domination  over  important  production 
factor  and  many  life’s  people.  Firstly,  foreign 
investment in infrastructure sector.  A large volume 
of  foreign  capital  coming  to  Indonesia  as 
development  investment  must  be  followed  by  the 
agreement, both  politically  and  economically.  This 
often  becomes  the  instrument  of  achieving  other 
states’  interest.  For  example,  the  capital  coming 
from  China  to  develop  many  infrastructures  in 
Indonesia,  is  followed  by  Turnkey  Project 
Management in which the company officials should 
be Chinese, and even majority labourers come from 
China.  The  development  that  should  absorb 
Indonesian workers is otherwise. It results in other 
problems  such  as  economic  gap,  population 
explosion, and etc. Secondly,  foreign investment in 
natural resource sector. Policy manipulation is made 
in  order to  be favourable to one  party,  particularly 
related to natural resource, in addition there are also 
other purposes of foreign investment. For example, 
the investment made by PT Freeport in Papua. Any 
policy  or  decision  made  affects  the  life  of  Papua 
people living surrounding the  mining company. PT 
Freeport  will  of  course  be  exposed  to  the  effect, 
either positively or negatively. 
 Recently  the  effect  more  often  occurring  is 
negative, for example natural damage. The abundant 
natural  resource  in  Indonesia  including  food,  bio-
energy,  and  etc.  will  attract  the  foreign  investors 
who  have  a  different  economic  system  (capitalism 
and  liberalism).  Finally,  the  case  of  geothermal 
power  potentially  made  into  a  650  KWH  mega 
project in Karanganyar will treat the life surrounding 
Mount  Lawu.  Considering  the  threat  factor  above, 
the students state that the government should make 
economic  policy  in  producing  and  distributing 
product and service, either at  home or  abroad. The 
students  also  suggest  that  State-Owned  Enterprise 
(BUMN)  should  not  be  mastered  by  another  state. 
They suggest as well that state-defending is required 
to relate to the natural resource, reducing the foreign 
investment  coming  into  sectors pertaining to many 
people’s lives. 
Social-cultural issue can be seen from tradition, 
education,  national  leadership,  national  objective 
and national  personality. The students  identify  two 
types  of  potential  threats  related  to  social-cultural 
issue.  Firstly,  the  exposition  to  ethnicity,  religion, 
race and inter-class (SARA) –related issues can lead 
to  conflict  that  can  divide  the  nation.  The  factual 
threat  coming  from  outside  &  non-state  actor  is 
related to the belief system, for example the entry of 
radicalism tenet and religion politicization. The next 
potential  threat  is  the  pure  consciousness  of  the 
meaning  of  Bhineka  Tunggal  Ika  (Unity  in 
Diversity).  Secondly,  human  trafficking  crime  has 
also  been the  factual threat  against  human  dignity, 
particularly  women  who  often  become  the  subject 
and object of the work. 
Defence-security issue can be seen from various 
dimensions  of  national  security,  including  external 
defence, internal security, public order, and disaster 
management  or  something  including  state security, 
public safety and individual safety aiming to develop 
national power. The students identify three types of 
threat  in defence-security  sector.  Firstly, the  threat 
against  the  state’s  territorial  border.  This  state’s 
territorial  border  is  a  threat  highly  affecting  the 
state’s security and defence, for example the border 
conflict with  Malaysia, related to the ownership  of 
Sipadan and Ligitan  island won by Malaysia. Such 
case potentially occurs in the future. For example, an 
incident  occurring  recently  is  the  case  of  National 
Sea near the South China Sea. The infringement was 
committed  by  Chinese  war  ships,  but  they  did  not 
admit  it.  Secondly,  the  threat  of  asymmetric/proxy 
war.  The  method  used  was  destructive  and 
manipulative  method  and  usually  involves  the 
financier,  black  operation,  and  intelligent  activity. 
The  invasion  also  attacks  the  state’s  stability. 
Asymmetric  war  (brain,  ideological  war,  etc.)  has 
been  conducted  silently  just  like  the  mosquito 
repellent attacking from the tip. 
Based on  FGD data and learning process result 
political,  defence  class  with  a  psycho-pedagogical 
development  approach,  knowledge  and 
understanding enables the citizens to undertake their 
effective  role  as  the  citizens.  So,  learning  is  a 
meaningful  assimilation.  It  is  in  line  with  Asal 
(2013) study finding as well that thematic issue can 
ICSE 2017 - 2nd International Conference on Sociology Education
240