
2.3   Smart Tourism in Geopark 
In the digital era, urban construction and development 
involving ICT in its various aspects, which is often 
known as the concept of smart city. The concept of 
smart  cities  is  usually  associated  with  embedded 
ecosystem technology that seeks to build Synergies 
with their social components in an effort to improve 
the quality of life and improve the efficiency of urban 
services (Eager, 2013 on Buhalis and Amaranggana 
2013).  Smart  tourism  is  aim  to  make  use  of 
technology  embedded  environmental,  process 
responsive  on  level  micro  and  macro,  end-user 
devices  in  some  touch-points  and  stakeholders 
interests involved the use of a dynamic platform as 
system nerve (Buhalis and Amaranggana 2013). Aim 
main from application aim smart travel is for improve 
experience  for  traveler  do  travel  and  for  improve 
effectiveness management asset destination tourism 
is concerned, to  ensure that  power competitiveness 
aim and satisfaction traveler could have monitored on 
constantly. 
Based on Buhalis and Amaranggana (2013), there 
is three ICT forms an important for set up destination 
tourism clever, there are Cloud Computing, Internet 
of Things and End-User Internet System Service. 
3  METHODOLOGY 
This research  was conducted by using a  marketing 
approach, particularly smart tourism model through 
event Ciletuh Geopark. The research method used is 
survey method that is research method conducted on 
large and small population, Questionnaires are used 
to obtain an overview of the event that have multiple 
indicators and also about respondents' opinions about 
smart tourism. Data collected consists of two types, 
namely  primary  data  and  secondary  data.  The 
population  in  this  study  is  from  the  data obtained, 
obtained  data  on  the  number  of  visitor  online  site 
Ciletuh Geopark until 2016 is 5.954 people (Geopark 
Ciletuh Palabuanratu, 2017).  
Sampling  is  done  by  random  sampling  Ciletuh 
method, number of people who have accessed Global 
Geopark online site. The sample in this study is 100 
online site visitors Ciletuh Geopark. In line with the 
objectives  of  the  study,  the  data  analysis  is  done 
through  several  stages:  d  data  compilation,  data 
tabulation,  descriptive  analysis  of  each  research 
variable after the data collected, study literature and 
field survey and measure smart tourism through event 
marketing of Ciletuh Geopark based on Perceptions 
of respondents. 
4  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 
Several events in  the region which held in Ciletuh 
following is as  wrong one  way for promote image 
brand Geopark Ciletuh. As for some event marketing 
is done Ciletuh Geopark Festival "Exploring Ciletuh" 
2015 Ciletuh Sabilulungan 2016 Amazing Geopark 
Adventure Tourism "Cimaja Geosurf Challenge "in 
2017,  Ciletuh  Geopark  Festival  "Earth,  Wind  and 
Culture" in 2017. 
Most of the respondents that is visitor’s geopark 
visit in the event geobike (54%). While percentage 
Lowest event  visit  geopark is  geokite  and  geosurf, 
only about 2% of tourists visiting at the event. The 
frequency respondent’s visitors geopark visit to event 
geopark  in  part  big  only  1x  within  1  year  (74%). 
While only  7%  who  visited 2-3  times in one year. 
Partly respondents’ visitors’ geopark is man that is by 
71% and 29% is  women. There is  a big range age 
respondent visitors geopark is on aged 26-34 years 
(51%), and only 5% range age 35-43 years. that work 
visitors in the event  the geopark this in part big is 
employees  private  (67%)  while  respondents  with 
work  employee’s  government  have  percentage 
Lowest that is by 1%. 
Product  event,  some  big  respondents  visitors 
geopark (76.2%) rate that a given event by EO not 
interesting,  there  is no  respondents  agreed  that  the 
event is held the Interesting. in part big respondents 
visitors geopark (72.3%) rate that a given event by 
EO no much was  done  in the geopark  ciletuh (not 
agree), and only about  1%  of  respondents felt that 
many at all events in the geopark ciletuh. as much as 
68.3%  of  respondents’  visitors  geopark  rate  that 
visitors  at  this  event  no  corresponding  with 
personality (not agree) and only about 2% who agree 
corresponding  with  personality.  More  than  half 
respondents  visitors  geopark  (53.5%)  rate  that 
location  events  held  by  EO  no  strategic  so  give 
assessment no agree   and only 2% of respondents felt 
that very agree that the event is held the its location 
strategic. 
Related to communication marketing, as many as 
76.2%  of  respondents’  visitors  geopark  rate  that 
advertising event held Event Organizer geopark not 
interesting and give assessment no agree   and in this 
no respondents agreed that advertising events held the 
Interesting. Most of the respondents’ visitors geopark 
(66.3%) rate EO imagery constructed event yet too 
good in the eyes respondents and given assessment 
don’t  agree  with.  Besides  that,  only  1%  of 
respondents were very agree that image of the event 
was very good in the eyes respondents. 
ICIEBP 2017 - 1st International Conference on Islamic Economics, Business and Philanthropy
540