
 
themselves.  The  implication  of  learning,  a  teacher 
must be able to explore the potential that exists in 
the students, both strength and weakness, so that the 
implementation  of  learning  in  accordance  with the 
needs  of  students,  especially  students  with 
intellectual disabilities.  
To  explore  students'  potentials,  both  strengths, 
weaknesses,  and  student  learning  needs,  teachers 
must  perform  activities  known  as  assessments. 
Essentially,  assessment  is  an  activity  to  explore 
information  about  the  ability,  constraints,  and 
learning needs faced by individuals as a foundation 
in  the  preparation  of  learning  programs  for  the 
individual  concerned.  Three  questions  that  are 
essential when the teacher conducts the assessment 
are: 1) what are the student difficulties / obstacles? 
2) why the hardship happened? 3) in what ways did 
they  complete  their  tasks?  Thus,  in  preparing  the 
adaptive  learning  programs  for  children  with 
intellectual  disabilities  in  inclusive  elementary 
school’s  teachers  should  start  with  the  results  of 
assessment analysis in the form of student learning 
needs. The learning needs of  students  is  what  will 
underlie  the  determination  of  learning  objectives, 
learning  materials,  strategies  and  evaluation  tools 
used to determine whether the established goals are 
achieved  or  not.  This  explains  that  the  position  of 
the  students  becomes  very  central,  because  each 
component of the adaptation of the learning program 
is focused on the progress and needs of the students. 
The adaptive learning program is not solely based on 
learning objectives but is based on the results of the 
assessment. The adaptive learning program does not 
work  for  students  but  works  with  students. 
Therefore, each student must know what goals will 
be achieved, what tasks will be done, and how to do 
them (Payne and Polloway, 2001). Assessment as a 
comprehensive  assessment,  then  teachers  need 
information  from  various  sources  from  family, 
community,  or  from  other related professions  such 
as doctors, psychologists, psychiatrists, and so forth. 
This  is  consistent  with  that  suggested  by  Beirne 
(2002). that "with the diversity of problems children 
experience with intellectual disabilities ... they need 
systematic  education  and  service  treatments  and 
multidisciplinary  services".  This  opinion  is 
reinforced  by  Handoyo  (2010)  who  argues  that: 
"Given that children with intellectual disabilities are 
children with complex and highly varied disorders, 
they  require  multidisciplinary  and  integrated 
treatment".  It  is  realized  that  no  man  is  perfect, 
everything  knows,  and  everything  can do  it on his 
own. Bertolino and O'Hanlon (2002) points out “Not 
one to be confined by purist thinking”, so the teacher 
is  not  the  only  source  of  problem  solving.  The 
source of the solution exists and is in the community 
and is in the social network created by the teacher. 
This means that learning needs to be considered as a 
collaborative  effort  between  teachers,  students  and 
related  experts,  sharing  along  with  their  expertise 
and validity. Therefore, a teacher needs co creating 
solvable  problems  together  with  other  related 
parties.  This  is  important  because  teachers  play  a 
role in formation and coaching within the context of 
learning.  Kirk  and  Gallagher  (1986)  argues  that 
"classroom  teachers  cannot  do  everything.  They 
need the help and  support of  personnel, both from 
psychologists,  school  counsellors,  and  parents.  " 
Payne  and  Polloway  (2001)  argues  that  parental 
involvement is an essential and mutual support as a 
substitute  for  previous  systems  often  found  in 
special  education,  where  there  is  a  separation 
between  family  and  school  settings.  Thus,  it  is 
reasonable  that  in  the  adaptive  preparation  of 
learning  programs  for  children  with  intellectual 
disabilities  in  primary  school  is  through  a  team 
approach. This team will work in collaboration from 
the  assessment  to  the  planning  of  the  learning 
program. 
Preliminary  study  results  show  that  the 
implementation  of  learning  for  students  with 
intellectual disabilities in inclusive primary schools 
has  not  been  optimal.  Some  of  the  causes,  among 
others,  are  the  unavailability  of  special  education 
teachers  in  schools,  the  low  level  of  teacher 
understanding in student learning (Rahardja, 2017), 
the absence of optimal cooperation between schools 
with  parents  with  intellectual  disabilities  (Aprilia, 
2017).  While the teachers at the elementary school 
at  this  time  have  not  understood  what  the 
appropriate  learning  program  to  overcome  the 
difficulties students with this intelligence defect. The 
condition  of  teachers  in  elementary  school  is  very 
reasonable  because  they  do  not  have  special 
education background (Rahardja, 2017).  
Many  teachers  in  regular  classes  and  special 
classes ask how they can accommodate the learning 
needs of students with intellectual disabilities. While 
at the same time teachers help all students meet the 
standards  set  by  the  government's  curriculum 
(Mastropieri  and  Scruggs,  1997).  Students  with 
intellectual  disabilities  present  in  primary  schools 
need  appropriate  educational  services  tailored  to 
their  level  of  difficulty  and  need  to  obtain 
appropriate educational achievement.  
The results  of preliminary  studies conducted by 
researchers  on some elementary schools in the city 
of West Java Province Cimahi show both teachers of 
Adaptive Reading Learning Program for Children with Intellectual Disabilities in Inclusive Elementary School
241