Outlining a Process to Manage the Complexity of Enterprise Systems Integration

Tommi Kähkönen, Kari Smolander

2017

Abstract

New service combinations are constantly needed to be created from the array of information systems and technologies, developed in different times for different purposes, crossing the organizational boundaries. Integration is the key matter in organizations, yet it is also an ambiguous and often a misunderstood concept in the field of information systems. In this paper, we construct an integration process from an inductive study in a large manufacturing enterprise, by examining its long-term ERP development endeavour. The process consists of four sub-processes with dedicated actors and activities. Integration Governance is needed to align Integration Realization with the strategic goals of the organization. Integration Housekeeping is dedicated to standardization activities and keeping the architectural description of the enterprise systems’ landscape updated, and to aid Realization. By utilizing the assets produced by Governance and Housekeeping Integration Evaluation is done to decide whether it is feasible to set up an integration project or abandon the initiative. The process helps managers to manage the complexity of enterprise systems integration and avoid its pitfalls.

References

  1. Alaranta, M., Kautz, K., 2012. A Framework for Understanding Post-Merger Information Systems Integration. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 13(1). Available at: http://aisel .aisnet.org/jitta/vol13/iss1/2.
  2. Alonso, G. ed., 2004. Web services: concepts, architectures, and applications, Berlin?; New York: Springer.
  3. Charmaz, K., 2006. Constructing grounded theory, London?; Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
  4. Chowanetz, M., Legner, C., Thiesse, F., 2012. Integration: An Omitted Variable in Information Systems Research. In ECIS 2012 Proceedings. European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).
  5. Ciborra, C., 2001. From control to drift: the dynamics of corporate global IT infrastructures, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
  6. Corbin, J., Strauss, A., 1990. Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), pp.3-21.
  7. Gericke, A., Klesse M., Winter R., Wortmann, F., 2010. Success Factors of Application Integration: An Exploratory Analysis. Communications of the AIS, 27(37), pp.677-694.
  8. Gulledge, T., 2006. What is integration? Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(1), pp.5-20.
  9. Henfridsson, O., Bygstad, B., 2013. The Generative Mechanisms of Digital Infrastructure Evolution. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), pp.907-931.
  10. Henningsson, S., Carlsson, S., 2006. Governing and managing enterprise systems integration in corporate M&A. In ECIS 2006 Proceedings. European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2006.
  11. Kähkönen, T., Smolander, K., 2013. ERP Integration - A Systematic Mapping Study. In 15th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2013). SciTePress - Science and and Technology Publications, pp. 23-35. Available at: http://www .scitepress.org/DigitalLibrary/Link.aspx?doi=10.5220/ 0004419900230035 [Accessed November 6, 2014].
  12. Kaplan, B., Maxwell, J.A., 2005. Qualitative Research Methods for Evaluating Computer Information Systems. In Evaluating the Organizational Impact of Healthcare Information Systems. Springer New York, pp. 30-55.
  13. Lee, J.-C., Myers, M., 2004. The Challenges of Enterprise Integration: Cycles of Integration and Disintegration Over Time. In ICIS 2004 Proceedings. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2004.
  14. Lozano, Á., Gil, A.B., Li, T., 2014. Integration of Different ERP Systems on Mobile Devices. In J. Bajo Perez et al., eds. Trends in Practical Applications of Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Systems. The PAAMS Collection. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 27-35. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-07476- 4_4 [Accessed June 8, 2015].
  15. Mehta, M., Hirschheim, R., 2004. A framework for assessing IT integration decision-making in mergers and acquisitions. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, pp. 264-274. Available at: http://ieeexplore .ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=12656 31 [Accessed December 1, 2014].
  16. Myers, M.D., 1997. Qualitative Research in Information Systems, Originally published in: MISQ Discovery, June 1997. Available at: http://www.inclentrust.org /inclen/uploadedbyfck/file/compile%20resourse/Qualit ative%20Research/Presentations/Qualitative%20Resea rch%20in%20Information%20Systems.pdf.
  17. Myers, M.D., Avison, D.E. eds., 2002. Qualitative research in information systems: a reader, London?; Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE.
  18. Jacobs, R.F., Weston, T.F.C., 2007. Enterprise resource planning (ERP)-A brief history. Special Issue Evolution of the Field of Operations Management SI/ Special Issue Organisation Theory and Supply Chain Management, 25(2), pp.357-363.
  19. Rodon, J., 2006. A methodological and conceptual review of inter organizational information systems integration. In ECIS 2006 Proceedings. European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2006/206.
  20. Sarker, S., Xiao, X., Beaulieu, T., 2013. Qualitative Studies in Information Systems: A Critical Review and Some Guiding Principles1. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), pp.iii-xviii.
  21. Strauss, A., Corbin, J., 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 3rd ed., SAGE Publications.
  22. Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., Sørensen, C., 2010. Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), pp.748-759.
  23. Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., Myers, M.D., 2010. Putting the “Theory” Back into Grounded Theory: Guidelines for Grounded Theory Studies in Information Systems. Information Systems Journal, 20(4), pp.357-381.
  24. Vathanophas, V., 2007. Business process approach towards an inter-organizational enterprise system. Business Process Management Journal, 13(3), pp.433-450.
  25. Walsham, G., 1993. Interpreting information systems in organizations, Chichester, West Sussex, England?; New York: Wiley.
  26. Welker, G.A., van der Vaart, T., van Donk, P.D., 2008. The influence of business conditions on supply chain information-sharing mechanisms: A study among supply chain links of SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(2), pp.706-720.
  27. Wijnhoven, F. et al., 2006. Post-merger IT integration strategies: An IT alignment perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15(1), pp.5-28.
  28. Lam W., Shankararaman, V., 2004. Enterprise integration - An enterprise integration methodology. IT Professional, 6(2), pp.40-48.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Kähkönen T. and Smolander K. (2017). Outlining a Process to Manage the Complexity of Enterprise Systems Integration . In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-758-249-3, pages 306-315. DOI: 10.5220/0006349703060315


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis17,
author={Tommi Kähkönen and Kari Smolander},
title={Outlining a Process to Manage the Complexity of Enterprise Systems Integration},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2017},
pages={306-315},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006349703060315},
isbn={978-989-758-249-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - Outlining a Process to Manage the Complexity of Enterprise Systems Integration
SN - 978-989-758-249-3
AU - Kähkönen T.
AU - Smolander K.
PY - 2017
SP - 306
EP - 315
DO - 10.5220/0006349703060315