stimulation process not only neck ganglia, but also 
influence on the stellate ganglion, the afferent 
branches of the cervical plexus, cranial nerves and 
their branches as well as other components of the 
sympathetic trunk. All in all, abovementioned 
improvements significantly enhance possibilities of 
the new technical implementations of the 
“SYMPATHOCOR-01” device in 
neurorehabilitation tasks. 
5 CONCLUSIONS 
The article describes new technical implementation 
of the “SYMPATHOCOR-01” device. 
Implementation of the device as the two block 
allowed to improve ergonomic characteristics, to 
make the device mobile and compact, to realize the 
simultaneous stimulation of the patients group by 
single doctor. Presented in the article analysis of the 
organizational and control principles of the 
“SYMPATHOCOR-01” device new implementation 
revealed the innovative possibilities in the 
neurorehabilitation tasks. Device mobility and 
wireless control allow doctors to combine several 
kind of stimulation including cognitive and motor 
loads and neuro-electrostimulation using 
“SYMPATHOCOR-01” device. 
The next step of device implementation is 
automatic real-time recording of the functional 
changes in the central and autonomic nervous 
systems. This recording will allow us to improve 
informational control of the treatment management 
and to increase treatment efficiency.  
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
The work was supported by Act 211 Government of 
the Russian Federation, contract № 02.A03.21.0006. 
REFERENCES 
Danilov, Y. P. and Kublanov, V. S., 2014. Emerging 
Noninvasive Neurostimulation Technologies: CN-
NINM and SYMPATOCORECTION. Journal of 
Behavioral and Brain Science, 4 (3), 105–113. 
Enriquez-Geppert, S., Huster, R.J., and Herrmann, C.S., 
2013. Boosting brain functions: Improving executive 
functions with behavioral training, neurostimulation, 
and neurofeedback. International Journal of 
Psychophysiology, 88 (1), 1–16. 
Kublanov, V. S., 2008. A hardware-software system for 
diagnosis and correction of autonomic dysfunctions. 
Biomedical Engineering, 42 (4), 206–212. 
Kublanov, V. S. and Babich, M. V., 2015. Principles of 
organization and control of multielectrode neuro-
electrostimulation device. In: Biomedical Engineering 
and Computational Technologies (SIBIRCON), 2015 
International Conference on. IEEE, 82–86. 
Kublanov, V. S., Shmirev, V. I., Shershever, A. S., and 
Kazakov, J.E., 2010. About Innovative Possibilities of 
Device ‘SIMPATOCOR-01’ in Management of 
Functional Disorders of Vegetative and Central 
Nervous System in Neurology. Kremlin medicine. 
Clinical Vestnik, 4, 60–64. 
Nagai, M. K., Marquez-Chin, C., and Popovic, M. R., 
2016. Why Is Functional Electrical Stimulation 
Therapy Capable of Restoring Motor Function 
Following Severe Injury to the Central Nervous 
System?  In: M. H. Tuszynski, ed. Translational 
Neuroscience. Springer US, 479–498. 
Netter, F. H., 2010. Atlas of human anatomy. Elsevier 
Health Sciences. 
Reichardt, L.F., 2006. Neurotrophin-regulated signalling 
pathways.  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal 
Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 361 (1473), 
1545–1564. 
Yuan, T.-F., Chen, W., Shan, C., Rocha, N., Arias-
Carrion, O., Paes, F., de Sa, A.S., and Machado, S., 
2015. Activity-Dependent Neurorehabilitation Beyond 
Physical Trainings: ‘Mental Exercise’ Through Mirror 
Neuron Activation. CNS & Neurological Disorders - 
Drug Targets (Formerly Current Drug Targets, 14 
(10), 1267–1271.