Ageing and Death
Breaking a Taboo
Matthias Rauterberg and Kiarash Irandoust
Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Den Dolech 2, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Keywords: Ageing, Good Death, Human Life, ICT, Meaning of Life, Oedipus Trilogy.
Abstract: This position paper argues for addressing ‘good death’ as part of ‘well ageing’ in human life. Although in
most societies death is protected through taboos, we have to provide solutions in helping citizens preparing
for their own death. The Oedipus Trilogy is an ancient narrative to describe clearly the three phases in any
human life, the unavoidability of those phase changes. We have to use the last phase of our life to prepare
for the end. We will summarize the different philosophical positons regarding ‘meaning of life’, and – alt-
hough addressing death is a mainly social issue – we describe the challenges for future ICT development in
supporting the important last steps of preparing for a ‘good death’.
1 INTRODUCTION
This position paper is all about human life in general
and the end of life in particular (Rauterberg, 2011)
(Vissers, Wang, Baha, Hu, and Rauterberg, 2012)
(Irandoust, 2013). The most common definition for
life is "the period between birth and death" and "the
quality which makes people, animals and plants dif-
ferent from objects, substances, and things which are
dead” (Cambridge Dictionary, 1995). The main
question which raises here is what the quality of life
is; a quality which at first place distinguishes living
humans from objects and secondly discriminates be-
tween human and animals or plants. A merely sim-
plistic answer to this question can be given in a bio-
logical manner. However, answering this question
from a sociological and humanistic point of view has
concerned philosophers, social scientists, care givers
and physicians for centuries, and defining the mean-
ing of life has been one of the most profound ques-
tions of human existence. In this paper we will focus
on the notion of a ‘good death’ as part of human life
(Kehl, 2006) and how ICT could play a role in here.
We are really in need of a new vision on life in gen-
eral and healthcare in particular (Marzano, 2009).
2 EXISTENTIAL QUESTION
In the Western world religious beliefs become less
and less influential to provide a framework for an-
swering this existential question about ‘meaning of
life’. So far we assume that our life is limited and
ends with death (Craig, 2008; Rauterberg, 2011).
But given these two empirical facts, how can then
death become a meaningful part of our life? In our
modern societies most ageing people do not want to
be confronted with their own death (Cappon, 1978),
and most contemporary societies try to avoid death
and dying (Todd, 2003). Young adults show fear of
dying and death when they search for meaning in
life (Cicirelli, 1998), but not if they show already
presence of meaning in life (Lyke, 2013). In an in-
ternational cross-cultural study “greater longevity
was not considered one of the most important com-
ponents of successful ageing“ (Fernandez-
Ballesteros et al., 2010, p. 52). Before we go into
more details for our topic of ageing and death, we
need some ontological framing. Philosophers have
been trying to develop and evaluate principles which
are meant to capture all the particular ways that a
life could obtain meaning. The primary views on the
meaning of life can be divided into (1) super-
naturalism, (2) objective naturalism, (3) subjective
naturalism and (4) nihilism (Metz, 2008).
2.1 Supernaturalism
The supernaturalist view in the monotheistic tradi-
tion is divided into God-centered and soul-centered
views (Cottingham, 2003) (Craig, 2008) (Seachris,
2011). While God-centered views believe God's ex-
istence, along with "appropriately relating" to God,
75
Rauterberg M. and Irandoust K..
Ageing and Death - Breaking a Taboo.
DOI: 10.5220/0005473900750080
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health (ICT4AgeingWell-
2015), pages 75-80
ISBN: 978-989-758-102-1
Copyright
c
2015 SCITEPRESS (Science and Technology Publications, Lda.)
is both necessary and sufficient for a meaningful
life, soul-centered views suppose having a soul and
putting it into a certain state makes life meaningful,
even if God does not exist. In God-based views
meaning in life is that one's existence is more signif-
icant, the better one fulfills a purpose God has as-
signed. Common idea is that God has a plan for the
universe and that one's life is meaningful to the de-
gree that one helps God realize this plan, perhaps in
the particular way God wants one to do so. Fulfilling
God's purpose (and doing so freely and intentional-
ly) is the sole source of meaning, with the existence
of an afterlife not necessary for it (Levine, 1987)
(Cottingham, 2003). Life would be meaningless, if a
person failed to do what God intends him to do with
his life. Generally, soul-centered view considers that
meaning in life comes from relating in a particular
way to an immortal, spiritual substance that super-
venes on one's body when it is alive and that will
forever outlive its death. If one lacks a soul, or if one
has a soul but relates to it in the wrong way, then
one's life is meaningless (Adams, 2002).
2.2 Objective Naturalism
The objective naturalism view proposes a physical
life without believing in presence of a supernatural
reality (Hartshorne, 1996). According to this view, a
meaningful life is possible and the meaning of life is
connected with solid or intrinsic nature and is inde-
pendent of mind- related matters. In other words, a
meaningful life by objective naturalism is not consti-
tuted based on a person's choice or will, instead it is
presented by inherently worthwhile or finally valua-
ble conditions. Objective naturalism is distinguished
from subjective naturalism by its emphasis on mind-
independence. Morality and creativity are widely
held instances of actions that give meaning to life.
These actions are meaningful regardless of whether
any autarchic agent (including God) believes them to
be or seeks to engage in them. To obtain meaning in
one's life, one ought to pursue these actions.
2.3 Subjective Naturalism
Similar to objective naturalism, subjective natural-
ism posits a meaningful life without believing in ex-
istence of a supernatural reality, however the current
view proposes that life is a function of what a person
wants or chooses. Therefore meaning of life varies
among different people, as mental status of one per-
son varies from another. Common views are one's
life is more meaningful if, the more one gets what
one happens to want strongly, the more one achieves
one's highly ranked goals, or the more one does what
one believes to be really important. "Lately, an in-
fluential subjectivist has asserted that the relevant
mental state is caring or loving, so that life is mean-
ingful just to the extent that one cares about or loves
something (Frankfurt, 1988).
Even though objective and subjective naturalism
disagree on the conditions for meaningfulness, both
are united in their rejection of supernaturalism and
necessity of God in order to secure a meaningful
life. In this way, both forms of naturalism can be
thought of as optimistic naturalisms, which agree
that meaningful life is possible in a godless universe.
2.4 Nihilism
Despite above mentioned views, which believe in
presence of a meaningful life, nihilism or pessimistic
naturalism denies existence of a meaningful life at
all. As some forms of nihilism is related to boredom
or dissatisfaction of human in life; in general, nihil-
ism argues that life is without objective meaning,
purpose, or intrinsic value, and if there would be a
value, there is no base for that. Most commonly,
Friedrich Nietzsche is the most often cited philoso-
pher associated with this life view (Hartshorne,
1996). The idea shared among many nihilists is that
there is something inherent to the human condition
that prevents meaning from arising, even if God
would exist. For instance, some nihilists make the
Schopenhauerian claim that our lives lack meaning
because we are invariably dissatisfied; either we
have not yet obtained what we seek, or we have ob-
tained it and are bored (Martin, 1993).
All these reading disclosed how drastically opin-
ions varied on the ‘meaning of life’. A question that
has a quite simple formulation has disputed complex
opinions; opinions which contradict or even coun-
teract each other. So, when talking about a society
and designing (designs which target cultural issues;
(Rauterberg, Hu, and Langereis, 2010)) for a society
means considering all these opinions (Vissers et al.,
2012).
3 POSSIBLE ANSWER(S)
Every human being walks a unique path through this
life. What happens in the life, regardless of being re-
ligious or non-religious, is in essence the salvation
history of that person (Girolimon, 1994). Probably
all people on this planet have this in common. In
many cultures and religions there was and still is the
conception that life happens in distinctive phases,
ICT4AgeingWell2015-InternationalConferenceonInformationandCommunicationTechnologiesforAgeingWelland
e-Health
76
each with a specific content, which were thresholds
for the next entrance (Rauterberg, 2011). Therefore,
it still is important to cross these phases consciously
and with the right effort. "When the time was right
the community prepared together with that person,
symbolized the transition often with a rite and cele-
brated the moment. This partition of life was an at-
tempt to procure conscious life" (Vissers et al.,
2012). In contemporary societies, little is left from
the earlier union of rites; however, the perception of
phases and transitions is still present in religious and
nonreligious people (Bax, 2009). These phases can
also be considered as ongoing processes of learning
and discovering that life is not all about ego, enjoy-
ment and achievement, but it is about living; living
with love, receptiveness and thus becoming a mild,
responsible and peaceful human being. A truly free
human being who knows what resignation is.
We can identify three main phases during each
individual life that are mostly common among dif-
ferent cultures: (1) childhood, (2) adulthood, and (3)
retirement. Of course we have also to consider the
phase before life (by coming into life through birth),
and the phase ‘after life’ leaving life through death.
In case of the supernaturalism we have to deal with
five different phases; for all the other four ontologi-
cal positions we can focus on the central three phas-
es only.
What is noticeable is that our lives are rich with
combinations of three major concerns in each of
those phases: love in (1), power in (2) and death in
(3) (Salem and Rauterberg, 2005). It seems that
power is the most attractive concern with utilizing
on death, and love the most desired means used to
overcome selfish and egoistic power (Gandhi’s doc-
trine of non-violent protest and civil disobedience to
achieve societal transformation has been hugely in-
fluential worldwide (Fischer, 1983)).
Our trilogy of emotional concerns – love, power,
death - has been developed by looking at several el-
ements of human history, culture and religions e.g.
remarkable events, lasting buildings and work of art
that have a certain historical or cultural value. In-
deed historical events are all reported within the per-
spective of one of the three concerns (e.g. king leg-
ends, wars and love stories). It is cross cultural and
cross centuries (Mahabharata 5BC – 2AD, Shake-
speare works such as Macbeth 1605-1606 AD, and
Romeo and Juliet 1594-1595 AD) (Salem and Rau-
terberg, 2005).
The three phases of life and the necessary trans-
formation between those is fully captured in the an-
cient occidental Oedipus trilogy (Sophocles, 2000),
first in 429 BC publicly performed in the polis of
Athens to educate and prepare all citizens for their
life divided in three parts (Higgins and Higgins,
2011). The whole tragedy in the Oedipus trilogy is
outlined in three separate books emphasizing differ-
ent aspects of human life and fate (Sophocles, 2000).
The life of Oedipus is described in three parts:
Part-1 in which - triggered by a special prophecy
- Oedipus as a baby was sentenced to death by his
own parents Laius and Jocasta (king and queen of
Thebes), but survived through the mercy of the exe-
cutioner; Oedipus grew up at Polybus’ neighbouring
kingdom, and become finally king of Thebes as the
oracle Creon predicted already after his birth.
Part-2 in which king Oedipus ruled Thebes and
had four children with Jocasta: Antigone and Ismene
(daughters) and Eteocles and Polynices (sons); when
he was forced to find out that he had unintentionally
killed his father Laius and had married his mother
Jocasta, he felt deeply ashamed.
In the final part-3 Oedipus was so shocked about
what he had done that he wanted to do penance by
blinding himself and searching for a way into the
Hades to become dead. His two daughters helping
him preparing for death accompanied him on this
last journey.
All three transitions from (1) being born into
childhood, (2) childhood to adulthood, and (3)
adulthood to retirement are inherently in a tragic
manner unavoidable to the character Oedipus; this
was and still is the main message to all citizens: Life
contains and requires these necessary and unavoida-
ble transformations from one phase to the other!
The final and most challenging fourth transfor-
mation is death. As long as humans are mortal, any
normative concepts prolonging life at any costs
seems highly questionable (Cosco, Stephan, and
Brayne, 2013). Of course, humans can live longer in
the future than today (WikiPedia, 2014); however
they still will be mortal. Instead of avoiding facing
death, effective preparation for this ultimate trans-
formation is preferable and therefore recommenda-
ble (Levine, 1987). Any culture and society neglect-
ing this can be considered incomplete and bound to
become inhumane (Leighton and Hughes, 1955)
(Platt, 1963) (Sankar, 1991) (Martinedale, 1998)
(Lamb, 2014).
3.1 The ‘Good Death’
Through the enlightenment period in the West most
of the rituals and other mystical ingredients seem not
at all or at least hardly applicable in Western cul-
tures although any healthy society seems to have a
fundamental need for intergenerational communica-
AgeingandDeath-BreakingaTaboo
77
tion supported by rituals (Rappaport, 1999). The dis-
appearance of rituals in our contemporary societies
seems to be influenced amongst others by urbaniza-
tion (Bax, 2009), and urbanization has a negative ef-
fect on the mental health of citizens (Lederbogen et
al., 2011). Busselle, Ryabovolova and Wilson
(2004) argues that content (i.e. norms, values, be-
liefs) with the potential to transport culture is very
important to cultivation effects, in particular when
the citizen is actively involved in the acquisition of
the cultural content.
The ending of life' might be a process wherein
life is gradually extinguished, or a momentary event.
The momentary event can be understood in three
different ways (Luper, 2009a): (1) Denouement
death, the ending of the dying process; (2) threshold
death, the point in the dying process when extinction
is definite; and (3) integration death, when the phys-
iological systems of the body irreversibly stop to
function as an integrated whole.
There are also three main philosophical views on
death concerned with the reality of human being: (1)
animalism (Olson, 2007), (2) personism (Luper,
2009b), and (3) mindism (Olson, 2007). The animal-
ism view suggests that we as human beings persist
our existence to remain the same ‘animal’. In this
view death is an irreversible end to all critical pro-
cesses, which maintain such existence. The person-
ism view says that we have self-awareness, it is
mostly involved with our psychological characteris-
tics, and loss of such characteristics results in death.
The mindism view indicates that regardless of hav-
ing self-awareness, we are minds and persist to re-
main the same mind. In this philosophy death is an
irreversible end to the processes that maintain exist-
ence of our minds.
Understanding death from these three point of
views have different significances, for example de-
mentia affects psychological characteristics (person-
ism view), but not the mind (mindism view). It can
be imagined that our mind can survive death, when
the body is already gone (assuming that mind is not
a part of the body). These examples show that the
way mindists interpret and understand death is dif-
ferent from animalist. In conclusion, approaching
death by different philosophical views has different
implications. Nevertheless, almost all of us want to
die in peace.
The phrase ‘good death’ as used in Kellehear
(1984) refers to the preparations around the death
scene initiated by the dying. It has little to do with
the theory and philosophy of Euthanasia - a term of-
ten translated from its Greek sources as meaning
‘good death’. Following Kellehear, the ‘good death’
is set in motion by the dying person him or herself
timely before the actual dying process. It is a set of
culturally sanctioned and prescribed behaviours, de-
signed to make death meaningful. “These behaviours
range from preliminary discussions with physicians
about life extending technologies, buying a grave
plot or stone, making a will, to talking about death
with family and other kin, making peace with God/s,
and so on” (1984, p. 8). Although it is difficult to in-
vestigate such tabooed topic (Walter, 2008), many
societies cross cultures and through time seem to
have had and still have concepts of a ‘good death’.
3.2 Possible ICT Support
According to Korhonen, Nordman and Eriksson
(2014) technology as a concept has three implica-
tions: (1) technology is ICT based devices and prod-
ucts to provide different services; (2) technology re-
fers to a process consisting of methods for helping
people; and (3) technology as a service indicates the
production of care by technology. Unfortunately, the
ethics of technology has yet not been fully estab-
lished as a guiding principle. In the overview by
Korhonen et al. some studies excluded completely
ethical reflections. Many studies in this overview
“discussed the ethics of technology as benefits such
as improved communication and symptoms man-
agement, and the simple use of e-health services
whilst others remained critical presenting ethical
problems such as unwillingness and the inability to
use technology, or conflicts with human aspects or
questions of inequality.” These issue are of serious
concerns for future research.
Now we will discuss the expressive possibilities
provided by emerging technology and upcoming de-
sign frameworks for supporting the dying process
ending with death (Corr and Corr, 2012). We can
distinguish the use of ICT in the last life phase as (1)
supporting the preparation for dying, (2) supporting
the dying event as such, and (3) support for connect-
ing with after-life.
(1) Support the preparation for dying: Possible sup-
port through ICT preparing for dying is any applica-
tion easily accessible for elderly to take actions;
such applications can provide getting an overview
over life extending technologies [see for more at
(WikiPedia, 2014)], organizing the dying event in-
cluding funeral (WikiHow, 2014), support lack of
social bonding (Davis, Hu, Feijs, and Owusu, 2015),
providing internet based discussion forums around
dying [e.g. see (Explore-Ideas, 2011)],
(2) Support the dying process: Tele-health was being
used by a range of health professionals (e.g. in on-
ICT4AgeingWell2015-InternationalConferenceonInformationandCommunicationTechnologiesforAgeingWelland
e-Health
78
cology care settings) that included specialist (i.e.
palliative) care, hospices, primary care settings,
nursing homes and hospitals as well as dying people
(Kidd, Cayless, Johnston, and Wengstrom, 2010).
The most common ICT based products and services
are advice services for palliative care patients, out-
of-hours telephone support, carers and health profes-
sionals, videoconferencing for interactive case dis-
cussions, consultations and assessments, and training
and education of palliative care and other health-care
staff. Kidd et al. suggest “that current technology is
usable and acceptable to patients and health profes-
sionals in palliative care settings.” A major ad-
vantage of robotic-assisted dying is that the robot
would always assist those dying persons that are
genuinely eligible, and thus such persons would not
be at the mercy of a willing care giver in order to
have some control over the timing and manner of
their death (van Rysewyk and Pontier, 2015).
(3) Support to transcendent death: Advanced tech-
nology can be used to establish a legacy through
leaving a digital trace for next generations, etc. To-
day we can already talk to people from the past
through appropriately designed conversational
agents, e.g. Confucius chatbot (Wang and Nakatsu,
2013) (Wang, Khoo, Nakatsu, and Cheok, 2014).
This technology could be used to build partner mod-
els as virtual communication agents to overcome the
isolation of high aged elderly.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The first conclusion we can draw regarding ICT in-
volvement support dying, is that we have to take the
ontological position of our end users into account.
Next to this, we need to know the local social setting
for something close to ‘good death’. However,
foremost we have to acknowledge that at the end of
each individual life on earth is the death. Facing this,
any society is well advised to prepare their ageing
citizens for dying instead of ignoring it. ICT can
play a mediating role in enabling ageing people to
prepare for this last challenge. The problem ad-
dressed in this paper is mainly a societal challenge
and not primarily a technological one. We need a
social and ethical discussion how and when to pre-
pare for and especially support dying, because death
gives meaning to life!
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are very grateful for all discussions about this
topic (in alphabetic order): Ehsan Baha, Loe Feijs,
Shadi Kheirandish, Ryohei Nakatsu, Ben Salem,
Naoko Tosa, Maarten Verbeek, Martien Vissers, and
many others. This paper was partially supported by
the Industrial Design department of TU/e and School
of Design, Jiangnan University, China.
REFERENCES
Adams, E. M. (2002). The meaning of life. International
Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 51(-), 71-81.
Bax, M. (2009). Generic evolution. Ritual, rhetoric, and
the rise of discursive rationality. Journal of Pragmat-
ics, 41(4), 780-805.
Busselle, R., Ryabovolova, A., and Wilson, B. (2004). Ru-
ining a good story: Cultivation, perceived realism and
narrative. Communications, 29(3), 365-378.
Cambridge Dictionary, o. (1995). Life. Cambridge (UK):
Cambridge University Publisher. Retrieved October
22, 2012, from http://dictionary.cambridge.org/ dic-
tionary/british/life.
Cappon, D. (1978). Attitudes of the ageing toward death.
Essence, 2(3), 139-147.
Cicirelli, V. G. (1998). Personal meanings of death in rela-
tion to fear of death. Death Studies, 22(8), 713-733.
Corr, C., and Corr, D. (2012). Death and Dying, Life and
Living (7th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Cosco, T. D., Stephan, B. C. M., and Brayne, C. (2013).
Deathless models of aging and the importance of ac-
knowledging the dying process. CMAJ: Canadian
Medical Association Journal, 185(9), 751-752.
Cottingham, J. (2003). On the Meaning of Life. London:
Routledge.
Craig, W. L. (2008). The absurdity of life without God. In
W. L. Craig (Ed.), Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth
and Apologetics (3rd ed., pp. 65-90). Wheaton, IL:
Crossway Books.
Davis, K., Hu, J., Feijs, L., and Owusu, E. (2015). Social
Hue: A subtle awareness system for connecting the el-
derly and their caregivers. In Pervasive Computing
and Communications Workshop (IEEE PerCom Work-
shop). Los Alamitos: IEEE Press.
Explore-Ideas. (2011). Death and Dying. internet: explore-
ideas. Retrieved January 22, 2015, from
http://www.explore-
ideas.com/index.php?category=Death_and_Dying.
Fernandez-Ballesteros, R., Garcia, L. F., Abarca, D.,
Blanc, E., Efklides, A., Moraitou, D., et al. (2010).
The concept of ‘ageing well’ in ten Latin American
and European countries. Ageing and Society, 30(01),
41-56.
Fischer, L. (1983). The essential Gandhi. New York: Vin-
tage Books.
Frankfurt, H. G. (1988). The Importance of What We Care
About: Philosophical essays. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Girolimon, M. T. (1994). Hugh of St Victor's De sacra-
mentis Christianae fidei: The sacraments of salvation.
The Journal of Religious History, 18(2), 127-138.
AgeingandDeath-BreakingaTaboo
79
Hartshorne, C. (1996). The meaning of life. Process Stud-
ies, 25(-), 10-18.
Higgins, R., and Higgins, C. (2011). CliffsNotes on Soph-
ocles' Oedipus Trilogy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Harcourt.
Irandoust, K. (2013). Path of life in mixed reality. Master,
Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technolo-
gy, Eindhoven, The Netherland.
Kehl, K. A. (2006). Moving toward peace: An analysis of
the concept of a good death. American Journal of
Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 23(4), 277-286.
Kellehear, A. (1984). The sociology of death and dying:
An overview. Australian Social Work, 37(3and4), 3-9.
Kidd, L., Cayless, S., Johnston, B., and Wengstrom, Y.
(2010). Telehealth in palliative care in the UK: a re-
view of the evidence. Journal of Telemedicine and
Telecare, 16(7), 394-402.
Korhonen, E.-S., Nordman, T., and Eriksson, K. (2014).
Technology and its ethics in nursing and caring jour-
nals: An integrative literature review. Nursing Ethics,
online(first), 1-16.
Lamb, S. (2014). Permanent personhood or meaningful
decline? Toward a critical anthropology of successful
aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 29(1), 41-52.
Lederbogen, F., Kirsch, P., Haddad, L., Streit, F., Tost, H.,
Schuch, P., et al. (2011). City living and urban up-
bringing affect neural social stress processing in hu-
mans. Nature, 474(7352), 498-501.
Leighton, A. H., and Hughes, C. C. (1955). Notes on es-
kimo patterns of suicide. Southwestern Journal of An-
thropology, 11(4), 327-338.
Levine, M. (1987). What does death have to do with the
meaning of life? Religious Studies, 23(-), 457-465.
Luper, S. (2009a, May 26, 2009). Death. The Stanford En-
cyclopedia of Philosophy 2nd. internet: Stanford En-
cyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved December 12,
2012, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum
2009/entries/death/
Luper, S. (2009b). The Philosophy of Death. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Lyke, J. (2013). Associations among aspects of meaning
in life and death anxiety in young adults. Death Stud-
ies, 37(5), 471-482.
Martin, M. W. (1993). Rethinking reverence for life. Be-
tween The Species, 9(4), 204-213.
Martinedale, B. (1998). On ageing, dying, death and eter-
nal life. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 12(3), 259-
270.
Marzano, S. (2009). An orchid called Mary: A vision on
healthcare in 2050, ICSID World Design Congress.
Singapore: Philips Inc.
Metz, T. (2008). The meaning of life. Stanford: The Stan-
ford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved Novem-
ber 15, 2012, from http://plato.stanford.edu/ ar-
chives/fall2008/entries/life-meaning/
Olson, E. T. (2007). What Are We?: A Study in Personal
Ontology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Platt, R. (1963). Reflections on ageing and death. The
Lancet, 281(7271), 1-6.
Rappaport, R. A. (1999). Ritual and Religion in the Mak-
ing of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Rauterberg, M. (2011). The three phases of life: An inter-
cultural perspective. In Proceedings 2nd International
Conference on Culture and Computing (pp. 80-85).
Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society.
Rauterberg, M., Hu, J., and Langereis, G. (2010). Cultural
computing - How to investigate a form of unconscious
user experiences in mixed realities. In R. Nakatsu, N.
Tosa, F. Naghdy, K. W. Wong and P. Codognet
(Eds.), Entertainment Computing Symposium - ECS
(IFIP Advances in Information and Communication
Technology Vol. 333, pp. 190-197). Heidelberg:
Springer.
Salem, B., and Rauterberg, M. (2005). Power, death and
love: A trilogy for entertainment. In F. Kishino, Y.
Kitamura, H. Kato and N. Nagata (Eds.), Entertain-
ment Computing - ICEC (Lecture Notes in Computer
Science Vol. 3711, pp. 279-290). Berlin Heidelberg
New York: Springer.
Sankar, A. (1991). Ritual and dying: A cultural analysis of
social support for caregivers. The Gerontologist,
31(1), 43-50.
Seachris, J. (2011). Meaning of life: Contemporary analyt-
ic perspectives. internet: Internet Encyclopedia of Phi-
losophy. Retrieved November 27, 2012, from
http://www.iep.utm.edu/mean-ana/
Sophocles. (2000). The three Theban plays: Oedipus the
King; Antigone; Oedipus at Colonus (R. Fagles and B.
Knox, Trans. 1st ed.): Penguin Classics.
Todd, S. (2003). Death does not become us. Journal of
Gerontological Social Work, 38(1-2), 225-239.
van Rysewyk, S. P., and Pontier, M. (Eds.). (2015). Ma-
chine Medical Ethics (Vol. 74). Cham Heidelberg
New York Dordrecht London: Springer International
Publishing.
Vissers, M., Wang, F., Baha, E., Hu, J., and Rauterberg,
M. (2012). Path of life in mixed reality. In Z. Pan
(Ed.), Proceedings 3rd International Conference on
Culture and Computing - ICCC 2012 (pp. 216-227).
Hangzhou: Hangzhou Normal University.
Walter, T. (2008). The sociology of death. Sociology
Compass, 2(1), 317-336.
Wang, X., Khoo, E. T., Nakatsu, R., and Cheok, A.
(2014). Interacting with traditional chinese culture
through natural language. Journal on Computing and
Cultural Heritage, 7(3), online no. 18 (11-19).
Wang, X., and Nakatsu, R. (2013). How do people talk
with a virtual philosopher: Log analysis of a real-
world application. In J. C. Anacleto, E. G. Clua, F. S.
C. da Silva, S. Fels and H. S. Yang (Eds.), Entertain-
ment Computing – ICEC 2013 (Lecture Notes in
Computer Science Vol. 8215, pp. 132-137). Heidel-
berg: Springer on behalf of IFIP.
WikiHow. (2014). How to make preparations for a funer-
al. Palo Alto, US: WikiMedia. Retrieved January 23,
2015, from http://www.wikihow.com/Make-
Preparations-for-a-Funeral.
WikiPedia. (2014). Life extension. internet: Wikimedia
Foundation. Retrieved January 22, 2014, from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_extension.
ICT4AgeingWell2015-InternationalConferenceonInformationandCommunicationTechnologiesforAgeingWelland
e-Health
80