
If 
d
 is  over 3nm,  effective  absorption  spectrum 
will  be  obviously  reshaped.  Peak  point  of  the 
effective  absorption  spectrum  is  deviated  from  the 
absorb  spectrum center.  In Fig.2, to the  situation of 
d
=1nm,  3nm,  6nm,  10nm,  peak  point  of  the 
effective  absorption  spectrum  is  808.5nm 
(0.3369/mm),  808.0nm  (0.2575/mm),  807.0nm 
(0.2196/mm), 808.5nm (0.1822/mm). In Fig.3, peak 
point  of  the  effective  absorption  spectrum  is 
808.5nm  (0.3410/mm),  808.0nm  (0.2489/mm), 
807.5nm (0.1994/mm), 808.0nm (0.1625/mm). That 
means  wider  pumping  spectrum  will  induce  lower 
peak  point  of  effective  absorption  coefficient,  and 
this  is  obvious  in  the  situation  of  narrow  pumping 
spectrum.  If  regards  peak  effective  absorption 
coefficient  of  FWHM=1nm  as  100%(808.5nm, 
0.3410/mm),  it  would  be  83.0%  (FWHM=2nm, 
808.5nm,  0.2831/mm),  73.0%(FWHM=3nm, 
808.0nm,  0.2489/mm),  66.8%(FWHM=4nm, 
808.0nm,  0.2277/mm),  62.3%(FWHM=5nm, 
807.5nm,  0.2124/mm),  (FWHM=6nm,  807.5nm, 
0.1994/mm),  52.3%(FWHM=8nm,  808.5nm, 
0.1785/mm),  47.7%(FWHM=10nm,  808.5nm, 
0.1625/mm).  
When 
d
 is  enlarged  from  1  to  10nm,  effective 
uniform region of effective absorption coefficient is 
enlarged. To the situation of flattop distribution, and 
d
=1nm, 3nm, 6nm, 10nm, width of 80% peak point 
of  effective  absorption  coefficient  is  1.0nm 
(808.0~809.0nm),  3.0nm  (806.5~809.5nm),  6.0nm 
(805.5~810.5nm),  8.0nm  (804.0~812.0nm), 
respectively.  To  the  situation  of  Gaussian 
distribution,  width  of  80%  peak  point  of  effective 
absorption  coefficient  is  1.0nm  (808.0~809.0nm), 
3.5nm  (806.0~809.5nm),  5.5nm  (805.0~810.5nm), 
9nm  (803.5~812.5nm),  respectively.  Making  a 
contrast  between  Fig.2  and  Fig.3,  80%  peak  point 
width of Gaussian and flattop distribution is similar. 
While,  if  regard  90%  peak  point  of  effective 
absorption coefficient as a kind of uniform standard, 
to the situation of flattop distribution, 
d
=1nm, 3nm, 
6nm,  10nm,  width  of  90%  peak  point  of  effective 
absorption  coefficient  is  <1.0nm  (808.5nm  one 
point),  1.5nm  (807.0~808.5nm),  2.0nm 
(806.0~808.0nm),  3.0nm  (807.0~810.0nm), 
respectively.  To  the  situation  of  Gaussian 
distribution,  width  of  90%  peak  point  of  effective 
absorption  coefficient  is  <1.0nm  (808.5nm  one 
point),  2.0nm  (807.0~809.0nm),  3.5nm 
(806.0~809.5nm),  6.0nm  (805.0~811.0nm), 
respectively.  It  should  be  pointed  out  that  absorb 
spectrum measuring precision is 0.5nm.  
Thus  it  can  be  seen  that  pumping  spectrum 
distribution  has  obvious  impact  on  global  shape  of 
pumping.  The  best  way  to  decrease  error  from 
pumping  spectrum  shape  is  getting  the  pumping 
spectrum data by experiment.  
 
Figure 4: Measurement result of pumping spectrum to the 
side-pumping amplifier. 
 
Figure  5:  Effective  absorption  spectrum  calculated  from 
experimental pumping spectrum. 
The  experimental  scheme  of  the pumping spectrum 
measurement contains three parts which are the side-
pumped  amplifier,  focusing  lens,  and  spectrometer. 
Focal length of the  lens is 150mm, and diameter is 
25.4mm.  The  distance  between  the  amplifier  and 
focusing lens is 910mm. Model of the spectrometer 
is AVaSpec-3648 (Avantes Co. Ltd), and it is placed 
on focusing point of the lens. A piece of optical filter, 
which  can  absorb  1064nm,  and  let  808nm  laser 
transmit  is  used  in  front  of  the  receiver  of  the 
spectrometer.  Absorption  spectrum  measurements 
result  is  shown  in  Fig.4.  It  is  a  typical  pumping 
spectrum,  and  FWHM  of  the  pumping  spectrum  is 
6.3nm.  By  the  same  calculation  method,  effective 
absorb  coefficient  is distributed  to each points,  and 
effective  absorb  spectrum  is  plotted  in  Fig.5.  The 
PHOTOPTICS2015-InternationalConferenceonPhotonics,OpticsandLaserTechnology
180