
neighborhood size between 3 and 10, and a default 
Lambda parameter equals to 1.0. According to Table 
5, C4.5 have presented the best accuracy rates 
comparing to K-NN and Naïve Bayes that did not 
exceed 97.56% and 93.18% respectively for training 
sets and 92.73% and 89.79% respectively for test 
sets. These classifiers have achieved good 
performance but still lower comparing to the 
performance of C4.5 algorithm. 
Table 5: Comparison of accuracy rates obtained using 
C4.5, K-NN and Naive Bayes classifiers. 
Classification 
techniques 
Training sets  Test sets  
Min 
(%) 
Max 
(%) 
Min 
(%) 
Max 
(%)
C4.5 96.01 100 91.04 100 
K-NN 95.12 97.56 83.33 92.73 
Naïve Bayes  85.25  93.18  83.82  89.79 
By applying C4.5 decision tree algorithm in this 
study, a promising and satisfying accuracy rates 
were achieved. In fact, the deep analysis of the 
initial data set enabled to identify the input attributes 
for each decision tree. This procedure allowed to 
simplify the model generation phase and produce 
decision trees achieving low error rates which 
contributes to the production of accurate and 
efficient preliminary conclusions. 
6 CONCLUSIONS 
In this paper, a case study about the application of 
C4.5 decision tree algorithm was conducted using a 
data set extracted from the ANS unit of university 
hospital Avicenne in Morocco. The objective of this 
study was to produce a decision support system to 
automate the analysis procedure of the ANS's test 
results and make it easier for specialists. Thereby, as 
a first step, C4.5 algorithm was used to generate a 
set of classifiers that enable to generate the 
preliminary conclusions needed to produce the 
appropriate diagnosis. The classifiers were evaluated 
and the results obtained achieved high accuracy rates 
which were very promising. However, as a 
limitation of this study, we may mention the small 
size of the data set used. Thus, more validation tests 
over bigger data sets should be conducted. 
As mentioned in Section 3, The ANS unit is 
specialized on conducting the ANS tests in order to 
analyze the preliminary conclusions deducted from 
the classifiers. These conclusions are analyzed by 
the specialists to provide a global synthesis, 
diagnosis of the patient’s state and prescribe the 
appropriate treatment. In this study, we worked on 
the first phase of the procedure and using the C4.5 
algorithm, we were able to define a set of rules 
helping to generate the preliminary conclusions. For 
future work, a validation of the generated classifiers 
by cardiologists on new patients needs to be carried 
out. Besides, classification and association 
techniques will be used to produce a complete 
decision support system that provide a diagnosis for 
patients and suggest the appropriate treatment. 
REFERENCES 
Aparna, R.. Bincy, G., Mathu, T., 2012. Survey on 
common data mining classification Technique. In 
International Journal of Wisdom Based Computing, 2.  
Apté, C., Weiss, S., 1997. Data mining with decision trees 
and decision rules. In Future Generation Computer 
Systems. 
Benarroch, E., 1993. The central autonomic network: 
Functional organization, dysfunction and perspective. 
In Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R. A., Stone, C. J. 
(1984). Classification and regression trees,  Chapman 
and Hall/CRC, 1
st
 edition.  
Coghlan, H. C., 1996. Orthostatic intolerance: mitral valve 
prolapse. In Primer on the Autonomic Nervous System, 
D. Robertson, P. A. Low, and J. Polinsky, Eds., 
Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA. 
Esfandiari, N., Babavalian, M. R., Moghadam, A. E., 
Tabar, V. 2014. Knowledge discovery in medicine: 
Current issue and future trend. In Expert Systems with 
Applications. 
Familia, A., Shenb, W. M., Weberc, R., Simoudis, E., 
(1997). Data preprocessing and intelligent data 
analysis. In Intelligent Data Analysis. 
Grubb, B. P., Karas, B., 1999. Clinical Disorders of the 
Autonomic Nervous System Associated With 
Orthostatic Intolerance: An Overview of 
Classification, Clinical Evaluation and Management. 
In Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 
Han, J., Kamber, M. 2001. Data Mining, Concepts and 
Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann publisher. 
Han, J., Kamber, M., Pei, P., 2011. Data preprocessing. In 
The Morgan Kaufmann Series in “Data Management 
Systems”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. 
Johansen, T. L., Kambskar, G., Mehlsen, J., 1997. Heart 
rate variability in evaluation of the autonomic nervous 
system. In Ugeskr Laeger. 
Karaolis, M. A., Moutiris, J. A., Hadjipanayi, D., Pattichis, 
C. S., 2010. Assessment of the Risk Factors of 
Coronary Heart Events Based on Data Mining With 
Decision Trees. In IEEE Transactions on Information 
Technology in Biomedicine. 
Kreibig, S. D., 2010. Autonomic nervous system activity 
in emotion: A review. In Biological Psychology.  
HeartDiseaseDiagnosisUsingC4.5Algorithms-ACaseStudy
403