
 
Table 23: Topics of the Systematic Review KA. 
Topics Area% Total% 
Challenges and solutions in GSE; 
Critical barriers in GSE; 
25.0 0.3 
Process models; Tools; 
Development patterns and 
practices; Aspects of 
communication; Success factors; 
Agile methodologies. 
12.5 0.2 
4 DISCUSSION 
The studies that discuss GSE are focused mainly on 
the following KAs: Software Engineering Processes 
(14%), Methods and Tools of SE (11%), Project 
Communications Management (8%) and Project 
Human Resource Management (6%). The high 
percentage of studies in these KAs was not a 
surprise, because GSE to be successful is very 
dependent on these KAs. 
The Project Procurement Management and 
Project Cost Management KAs, both from PMBOK, 
did not have identified studies. Other KAs, such as 
Time Management had less than 10 studies each. 
The Software Engineering Processes, Methods 
and Tools of Software Engineering and Design 
software KAs from SWEBOK correspond together 
to 27.1% of studies in GSE. These areas obtained a 
higher percentage of studies, in comparison to KAs 
of the PMBOK. This result indicates that most 
challenges of GSE might be concentrated in these 
KAs.  
Based on this SLR we found studies for most 
Software Engineering KAs, but still there are topics 
not explored, and this might be an opportunity. We 
also identified new topics, classified in the General 
Area KA. These new topics indicate that there are 
several research opportunities in the GSE field, with 
several interesting topics to be explored, as the area 
evolve. 
5 CONCLUSIONS 
GSE is increasing and it is essential for 
organizations that wish to be in the software 
development market. Several organizations are 
doing GSE, and research in this field is essential to 
the growth of GSE as an area of research.  
The existing studies are distributed over almost 
all SE KAs. Most of the studies found are 
concentrated in KAs that are the basis of GSE, such 
as Software Engineering Processes, Methods and 
Tools, Project Communications Management and 
Project Human Resource Management.  
The analysis of KAs’ study topics reveals that 
the GSE is an immature research field and that there 
are still many research opportunities. This way, we 
believe that the development of this work 
contributed to the identification of emerging 
research areas and topics, along with research 
opportunities. In order to continue this work, this 
SLR may be expanded to reach other digital 
libraries. New studies can help identifying new 
research topics and additional study areas. 
REFERENCES 
Abran A., Moore J. W. et al., 2004. Guide to the Software 
Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK®), IEEE 
Computer Society 2004 Guide. 
Ebling T., Audy, J. L. N., Prikladnicki, R., 2009. A 
Systematic Literature Review of Requirements 
Engineering in Distributed Software Development 
Environments.  ICEIS (3) 2009, 363-366. 
Jiménez, M., Piattini, M., Vizcaíno, A., 2009. Challenges 
and improvements in distributed software 
development: A systematic review. Advances in 
Software Engineering. 
Kitchenham, B., 2004. Procedures for Performing 
Systematic Reviews. Joint Technical Report SE0401 
and NICTA Technical Report 0400011T.1, Software 
Engineering Group, Department of Computer Science, 
Keele University. 
PMBOK, A Guide to the Project Management Body of 
Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), Third Edition, 2004, 
Project Management Institute Publications, U.S.A. 
Prikladnicki, R., Audy, J. L. N., Shull, F., 2010. Patterns 
in Effective Distributed Software Development. IEEE 
Software, v. 27, 12-15. 
Smite, D., Wohlin, C., Gorschek, T., Feldt R., 2009. 
Empirical evidence in global software engineering: a 
systematic review. Empirical Softw. Eng., 91-118. 
Smite, D., Wohlin, C., Gorschek, T., Feldt, R., 2010. 
Empirical evidence in global software engineering: a 
systematic review. Empirical Softw. Eng. 2010,  
91-118. 
MAPPING THE EVOLUTION OF RESEARCH ON GLOBAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING - A Systematic Literature
Review
265