
 
5 BI EVALUATION 
Wixom and Watson (2001) investigated several 
implementation success factors affecting data 
warehouse success. Shin (2003) expanded on the 
work done by Wixom and Watson (2001) and 
examined the success factors in data warehousing by 
using system quality, information quality, service 
quality and user satisfaction as variables. 
A questionnaire was used as the instrument to 
evaluate the BI implementation. Some of the 
questions of Shin (2003) were re-used in the 
questionnaire and new ones were added that were 
applicable to the FSDOH data warehouse evaluation. 
The questionnaire utilized a 5 point Likert scale 
and consisted of three sections. Section 1 covered all 
the basic demographics of the respondents. Section 2 
looked at how the respondents used the existing data 
warehouse while section 3 covered the perceptions 
of respondents on the information from the data 
warehouse. 
Data was collected from data warehouse users in 
the FSDOH which included ART, human resources, 
revenue collection and hospital managers. All users 
received a questionnaire if they were either using the 
data warehouse themselves or request information 
from the knowledge workers who extract 
information for them from the data warehouse on a 
regular basis. The selected group was well 
represented over the five layers of employment at 
the FSDOH namely: production workers, 
supervisors, assistant managers, middle managers 
and top managers. 
A total of 87 questionnaires were sent to this 
selected group of whom 51 responded. This 
translated into a response rate of 58.6%. Three (3) of 
the 51 respondents’ questionnaires were incomplete 
and discarded from the study. The final number of 
completed questionnaires to be used for analysis was 
48. 
6 RESULTS 
Most users (56.2%) accessed the system either 
monthly or quarterly. Six users used the system on a 
daily basis. Eight main organizational tasks were 
included in the survey. The first four (decision-
making support, status monitoring, planning, and 
forecasting) were considered more unstructured than 
the others (administration, accounting, resource 
allocation/budgeting and personnel management). 
Personnel management (62.5%) stood out as the 
most frequent task while forecasting (45.9%) was 
the least performed task.  
Direct and indirect usage was also investigated. 
Most users (67.2%) indicated that they make use of 
either an assistant or knowledge workers at head 
office to obtain the information from the data 
warehouse for them. It is worth mentioning that the 
knowledge workers at head office were provided 
with certified training that was offered by Cognos 
South Africa. These courses empowered them to 
assist users with analysis requests. 
The remaining users (32.8%) retrieve the data by 
themselves and perform their own analysis. Most of 
these users attended an in-house business 
intelligence course, which introduced them to basics 
of Cognos reporting and Cognos cube analysis. 
For the unstructured tasks, most of the survey 
respondents would use the data warehouse 
sometimes or never while for the structured tasks the 
usage would be from very frequently to sometimes. 
According to the study done by Shin (2003), more 
users were using the data warehouse for unstructured 
duties rather than for routine or administrative 
responsibilities. For this study the weight tends to be 
for structured tasks instead of unstructured tasks. 
This was an unexpected finding. A possible 
explanation for this finding could be that the BI 
maturity of the survey respondents was much lower 
than the respondents used in the study by Shin 
(2003). This possibility is supported with the finding 
that 67.2% of respondents indicated they make use 
of either an assistant or knowledge worker to obtain 
information from the data warehouse instead of by 
them self. 
Respondents were on the whole very positive 
about data quality, levels of detail and accuracy. 
Most respondents (89.6%) agreed that the data in the 
data warehouse is current enough to meet work 
needs. That was matched by 75% who disagreed that 
the data warehouse was out of date for a similar 
question that was negatively phrased. 
A total of 79.2% of the respondents indicated 
that the data warehouse maintains data at an 
appropriate level of detail to perform their tasks. 
This was matched by 68.1% who disagreed that the 
data warehouse does not have enough detail to make 
them more productive. 
Most respondents (70.3%) indicated that the data 
in the data warehouse is accurate and reliable and 
this was matched by (81.9%) who were either unsure 
or disagreed that the data is inconsistent. 
Next the data warehouse was evaluated in terms 
of functionality, flexibility, processing speed and 
ease of use. Respondents were on the whole very 
EFFECTIVENESS OF A BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE SOLUTION TO MANAGE THE ANTIRETROVIRAL
THERAPY PROGRAMME
545