COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF GOOGLE HEALTH API VS. MICROSOFT HEALTHVAULT API

Ali Sunyaev, Alexander Kaletsc, Helmut Krcmar

2010

Abstract

Electronic Health Records (EHR) offer patients the opportunity to access their own medical records. Google and Microsoft recently extended their public services by introducing internet-based personal healthcare information platforms – Google Health and Microsoft HealthVault. Over one hundred thousand people have registered at the two services since they were launched. Both companies invite other for-profit companies as well as non-profit organizations to participate in the design, development, and distribution of their own healthcare-related applications. Such applications are based on the free accessible EHR systems of Google and Microsoft and provide further benefits to patients. Due to its simplicity and usability, an API design could determine the variety of value-added applications developed and thus be essential for the commercial success (and potential market dominance) of one of these EHR systems. This work examines and compares the designs of Google Health API and Microsoft HealthVault API. Such an evaluation provides benefits for both research and practice: on the one hand, the results provide an overview of the different open API designs, and, on the other hand, the results provide the developer community with useful lessons learned from comparing the examined APIs.

References

  1. Berger, R. 2007. Study on the secondary healthcare market. Available: http://www.rolandberger.com/company/press/releases/ 517-press_archive2007_sc_content/ Study_on_the_secondary_healthcare_market.html [Accessed 2009-07-10].
  2. Berndtson, C. 2008. Microsoft, Google Joust-and Concur-On Personal Health Records [Online]. Available: http://www.crn.com/healthcare/212101164;jsessionid= MH30505NPU55OQSNDLOSKHSCJUNN2JVN [Accessed 18.05.2009].
  3. Blankenhorn, D. 2008. Microsoft HealthVault is nothing like Google Health [Online]. Available: http://healthcare.zdnet.com/?p=742&tag=rbxccnbzd1 [Accessed 03.05.2009].
  4. Bloch, J. 2006. How to design a good API and why it matters. Companion to the 21st ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications. Portland, Oregon, USA: ACM.
  5. Cross, M. 2007. Goliath moves into healthcare records. BMJ, 335.
  6. Google. 2009a. Google Health [Online]. Available: https://www.google.com/health/ [Accessed 2009-07- 08].
  7. Google. 2009b. Google Health FAQ [Online]. Available: http://www.google.com/intl/en-US/health/faq.html [Accessed 24.05.2009].
  8. Kolakowski, N. 2009. Microsoft's HealthVault a Challenge to Google Health? [Online]. Available: http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Health-CareIT/Microsofts-HealthVault-A-Challenge-to-GoogleHealth-711489/ [Accessed 03.05.2009].
  9. Microsoft. 2009. Microsoft HealthVault [Online]. Available: http://www.healthvault.com/personal/websitesoverview.html [Accessed 2009-07-08].
  10. Sunyaev, A., Chornyi, D., Mauro, C., Krcmar, H. 2010. Evaluation Framework for Personal Health Records: Microsoft HealthVault vs. Google Health. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 43), January 5 - 8, 2010, Kauai, Hawaii. To appear.
  11. Tang, P. C., Ash, J. S., Bates, D. W., Overhage, J. M. & Sands, D. Z. 2006. Personal Health Records: Definitions, Benefits, and Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adoption. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13, 121-126.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Sunyaev A., Kaletsc A. and Krcmar H. (2010). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF GOOGLE HEALTH API VS. MICROSOFT HEALTHVAULT API . In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Health Informatics - Volume 1: HEALTHINF, (BIOSTEC 2010) ISBN 978-989-674-016-0, pages 195-201. DOI: 10.5220/0002694901950201


in Bibtex Style

@conference{healthinf10,
author={Ali Sunyaev and Alexander Kaletsc and Helmut Krcmar},
title={COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF GOOGLE HEALTH API VS. MICROSOFT HEALTHVAULT API},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Health Informatics - Volume 1: HEALTHINF, (BIOSTEC 2010)},
year={2010},
pages={195-201},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002694901950201},
isbn={978-989-674-016-0},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Health Informatics - Volume 1: HEALTHINF, (BIOSTEC 2010)
TI - COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF GOOGLE HEALTH API VS. MICROSOFT HEALTHVAULT API
SN - 978-989-674-016-0
AU - Sunyaev A.
AU - Kaletsc A.
AU - Krcmar H.
PY - 2010
SP - 195
EP - 201
DO - 10.5220/0002694901950201