Guadalupe Aguado de Cea, Asunción Gómez-Pérez, Elena Montiel-Ponsoda, Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa



In this paper we describe how linguistic patterns can contribute to ontology development by enabling an easier reuse of some ontological resources. In particular, our research focuses on the reuse of ontology design patterns and ontology statements by relying on linguistic constructs at different stages of the reuse process. With this aim, we propose the employment of lexico-syntactic patterns with two objectives: 1) the reuse of ontology design patterns, and 2) the validation of ontology statements for their subsequent reuse in the ontology development. To illustrate the proposed approaches, we will present some examples of lexico-syntactic patterns and their employment in the reuse of ontology design patterns and in the validation of ontology statements.


  1. Aguado de Cea, G., and Montiel-Ponsoda, E. 2009. When Phraseology and Ontologies Meet. In Proccedings of the XI Simposio Internacional de Comunicación Social. Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
  2. Aguado De Cea, G., Gómez-Pérez, A., Montiel-Ponsoda, E., and Suárez-Figueroa, M.C. 2008. Natural Language-Based Approach for Helping in the Reuse of Ontology Design Patterns. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering (EKAW), pp. 32-47.
  3. Aussenac-Gilles, N., and Jacques, M.P. 2006. Designing and Evaluating Patterns for Ontology Enrichment from Texts. In Staab, S. and Svatek, V. (ed.) Managing Knowledge in a World of Networks, 15th International EKAW Conference, Springer Verlag.
  4. Berland, M., and Charniak, E. 1999. Finding parts in very large corpora. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, College Park, MD.
  5. Cimiano, P. 2006. Ontology Learning and Population from Text. Algorithms, Evaluation and Applications. Springer Verlag.
  6. Cimaino, P. and Wenderoth, J. 2007. Automatic Acquisition of Ranked Qualia Structures from the Web. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 888-895.
  7. Dzbor, M., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Blomqvist, E., Lewen, H., Espinoza, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., and Palma, R. 2009. NeOn Deliverable D5.6.2 Experimentation and Evaluation of the NeOn Methodology.
  8. Etzioni, O., Cafarella, M., Downey, D., Popescu, A.M., Shaked, T., Soderland, S., Weld, D., and Yates, A. 2004. Methods for domain-independent information extraction from the web: An experimental comparison. In Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 391-398.
  9. Fliedl, G., Kop Ch., and Vöhringer, J. 2007. From OWL Class and Property Labels to Human Understandable Natural Language. In Natural Language Processing and Information Systems, Volume 4592/2007, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
  10. Gangemi, A. 2005. Ontology Design Patterns for Semantic Web Content. In: Musen et al. (eds.): Proc. of the 4th ISWC, Springer, Heidelber.
  11. Hearst, M. 1992. Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pp. 539-545.
  12. Kavalec, M. and Svátek, V.2005. A study on automated relation labelling in ontology learning. In Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., Magnini, B.(eds.) Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications. IOS Press, pp. 44-58.
  13. Menzies, T. 1997. Object-oriented patterns: Lessons from expert systems. Software-Practice and Experience, 1(1).
  14. Pasca, M. 2005. Finding Instance Names and Alternative Glosses on the Web: WordNet Reloaded. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 280-292.
  15. Reinberger, M.L., and Spyns, P. 2004. Discovering knowledge in texts for the learning of dogma-inspired ontologies. In Proceedings of the ECAI Workshop on Ontology Learning and Population, pp. 19-24.
  16. Sabou, M., Aguado de Cea, G., d'Aquin, M., Daga, E., Lewen, H., Montiel-Ponsoda, E., Presutti, V. and Suárez-Figueroa, M.C. 2009. NeOn D2.2.3. Evaluation and Selection of Knowledge Components.
  17. Sabou, M., d'Aquin, M., and Motta, E. 2008. Exploring the Semantic Web as Background Knowledge for Ontology Matching. Journal on Data Semantics, XI.
  18. Sánchez, D., and Moreno, A. 2008. Learning nontaxonomic relationships from web documents for domain ontology construction. In Data Knowledge Engineering, 64, pp. 600-623.
  19. Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Brockmans, S., Gangemi, A., Gómez-Pérez, A., Lehmann, J., Lewen, H., Presutti, V. and Sabou, M. 2007. NeOn D5.1.1. NeOn Modelling Components.
  20. Suárez-Figueroa, M.C. et al. 2008. NeOn D5.4.1. NeOn Methodology for Building Contextualized Ontology Networks.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

de Cea G., Gómez-Pérez A., Montiel-Ponsoda E. and Suárez-Figueroa M. (2009). USING LINGUISTIC PATTERNS TO ENHANCE ONTOLOGY DEVELOPMENT . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: KEOD, (IC3K 2009) ISBN 978-989-674-012-2, pages 206-213. DOI: 10.5220/0002300002060213

in Bibtex Style

author={Guadalupe Aguado de Cea and Asunción Gómez-Pérez and Elena Montiel-Ponsoda and Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: KEOD, (IC3K 2009)},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: KEOD, (IC3K 2009)
SN - 978-989-674-012-2
AU - de Cea G.
AU - Gómez-Pérez A.
AU - Montiel-Ponsoda E.
AU - Suárez-Figueroa M.
PY - 2009
SP - 206
EP - 213
DO - 10.5220/0002300002060213