Eleonora Ioulia Malama, Fotini Patsioura, Maro Vlachopoulou, Vicky Manthou



Successful e-learning applications are based upon integrated marketing strategy, which involves thorough market and target group analysis. Understanding target group specific needs and characteristics, analyzing environmental factors, determining strategic and tactical aims, as well as, planning the requiring marketing mix elements are considered important activities to develop a competency based and IT deliverable e-learning academic module. As a result, e-learning providers need to position themselves in the marketplace based upon their missions and abilities in order to respond to e- learning challenges in a strategic manner. Greek educational institutions reveal increased interest, but also hesitance in developing and administrating e-learning applications. This paper aims to provide Greek prospective e-learning providers with all the necessary information regarding prospective target market segments in order to specify perceptions about e-learning concept. Specifically, a primary research was conducted in order to examine and analyze samplesβ aspects, demands and needs towards the adoption of e-learning programs. Descriptive statistics as well as Multiple Correspondence Analysis are used to present comparative statistical data.


  1. Alexander, S., McKenzie, J., with Geissinger, H., 1998. An Evaluation of Information Technology Projects for University Learning. DEETYA, National Capital Printing, 1998
  2. Argyris, C. and Schon, D., 1978. Organisational Learning: A Theory in Action Perspective, Reading. Mass: Addison Wesley
  3. Benigno, V., & Trentin, G. 2000. The evaluation of online courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 259-270
  4. Bouhnik, D., & Marcus, T., 2006. Interaction in distancelearning courses. Journal of the American Society Information Science, 57(3), 299-305
  5. Capper, J., 2001. E-learning growth and promise for the developing world. TechKnowLogia, May/June. Available at: Retrieved July 20, 2007.
  6. Clausen, S.-E., 1998. Applied Correspondence Analysis: An Introduction. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07- 121, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  7. Dillon, C. L., & Guawardena, C. N., 1995. A framework for the evaluation of telecommunications-based distance education. Paper presented at the 17th Congress of the International Council for Distance Education, Open University, Milton Keynes.
  8. Dixon, N., 1994. The Organisational Learning Cycle: How Can We Learn Collectively?, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead
  9. Dublin, L., 2004. The nine myths of e-learning implementation: ensuring the real return on your elearning investment. Industrial and Commercial Training, 36 (7), 291-294
  10. Dutton, J., & Perry, J., 2002. How do online students differ from lecture students?. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 169-190.
  11. Easterby-Smith, M., 1997. Disciplines of organizational learning: contributions and critiques. Human Relations., 50(9), 1085-1113
  12. Epic survey report 2003. The future of e-learning. Available at: apers/Epic_Survey2003.pdf. Retrieved May 25 2005
  13. Evans, J. & Haase, I. 2001. Online business education in the twenty-first century: an analysis of potential target markets. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications & Policy, 11(3), 246-260
  14. Freund, Y. P., 1988. Critical success factors. Planning Review, 16(4), 20-25.
  15. Greenacre, M., 2007. Correspondence Analysis in Practice. CRC,London, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman &Hall.
  16. Gordon, Y., Young, A. & Bal, J., 2003. External environmental forces affecting e-learning providers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21 (3), 168-172
  17. Hampton, G., 1979. Students as Subjects in International Behavioural Studies. Journal of International Business Studies, 10 (2), 94-96
  18. Ingram, H., Biermann, K., Cannon, J., Neil, J., & Waddle, C., 2000. “nternalizing action learning: a company perspective. Establishing critical success factors for action learning courses. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 12(2), 107- 113
  19. Leidner, D. E., & Jarvenpaa, S. L., 1993. The information age confronts education: case studies on electronic classroom. Information Systems Research, 4(1), 24- 54.
  20. Leonardo da Vinci project (2003). E-trainers, National statement on e-learning in Greece. Available at Retrieved September 12 2005
  21. Liaw, S. S., 2008. Investigating students' perceived satisfaction behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computer & Education, 51 (2), 864-873
  22. McPherson, M. & Nunes, M. B., 2006. Organisational issues for e-learning. Critical success factors as identified by HE practitioners. International Journal of Educational Management, 20 (7), 542-558
  23. Markos, A., Menexes, G. & Papadimitriou, I., 2008. The CHIC Analysis v1.0. Data Analysis Bulletin, 19-30 (In Greek).
  24. Moingeon, B. & A., Edmondson (eds), 1996, Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  25. Papp, R., 2000. Critical success factors for distance learning. Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA.
  26. Pedler, M., 1998. Self-development and work organizations. In Pedler, M. and Boydell, T. (Ed.). Applying Self-Development in Organisations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  27. Politehnica (University of Bucharest), 2001. Implementation of the Personalised ODL System D.9.2.5. Available at: eport.pdf. Retrieved August 25, 2005.
  28. Rosner, H., 1996. Trapping Students in the Web. Brandweek, 37 (16), 50-52
  29. Seufert, S., 2001. E-learning Business Models:Framework and Best Practice Examples. Retreived November 14, 2009 from,
  30. Selim, H., 2007. Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance:Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49, 396-413
  31. Senge, P., 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation. Century Business, London.
  32. Sheth, J.N., Sharma, A., 2005. International E-marketing: opportunities and issues. International Marketing Review, 22 (6), 611-622
  33. Smith, J., 2001. Blended Learning An old friend gets a new name. Executive Update Online. Available at: lended.htm. Retrieved May 25 2005
  34. Soong, B. M. H., Chan, H. C., Chua, B. C., & Loh, K. F., 2001. Critical success factors for on-line course resources, Computers & Education, 36(2), 101-120.
  35. Volery, T., & Lord, D. 2000. Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216-223.
  36. Webster, J., & Hackley, P., 1997. Teaching electiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1282-1309
  37. Yavas, U., 1994. Research Note: Students as Subjects in Advertising and Marketing Research. International Marketing Review, 11(4), 35-43
  38. Urdan T., Weggen C., (2000) Corporate E-Learning: Exploring A New Frontier. Retreived January 14,

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Malama E., Patsioura F., Vlachopoulou M. and Manthou V. (2009). TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR e-LEARNING CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR - An Analysis of Greek Students Perceptions . In Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Business - Volume 1: ICE-B, (ICETE 2009) ISBN 978-989-674-006-1, pages 230-237. DOI: 10.5220/0002218802300237

in Bibtex Style

author={Eleonora Ioulia Malama and Fotini Patsioura and Maro Vlachopoulou and Vicky Manthou},
title={TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR e-LEARNING CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR - An Analysis of Greek Students Perceptions},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Business - Volume 1: ICE-B, (ICETE 2009)},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Business - Volume 1: ICE-B, (ICETE 2009)
SN - 978-989-674-006-1
AU - Malama E.
AU - Patsioura F.
AU - Vlachopoulou M.
AU - Manthou V.
PY - 2009
SP - 230
EP - 237
DO - 10.5220/0002218802300237