Nadja Damij



This paper discusses the problem of process modelling and aims to introduce a simple technique called the activity table to find a better solution for the problem mentioned. The activity table is a technique used in the field of process modelling and improvement. Business process modelling is done by identifying the business processes and is continued by defining work processes and activities of each chosen business process. This technique is independent on the analyst ans his/her experience. It requires that each identified must be connected to its resource and its successor activity and in this manner contribute a great deal in developing a process model, which represents a true reflection to actual business process. The problem of conducting a surgery is used as an example to test the technique.


  1. Ackerman, F., Walls, L., Meer, R., Boorman, M. (1999). Taking a Strategic View of BPR to Develop a Multidisciplinary Framework. Journal of Operational Research Society, 195-204.
  2. Aguilar-Saven, R. (2001). Business Process Modelling techniques and tools. Department of Production Economics, WP291 Linkoping Sweden.
  3. Aguilar-Saven, R. (2003). Business Process Modeling. Review and Framework. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 90, No. 2, 129-149.
  4. Aguilar-Saven, R., Olhager, J. (2002). Integration of Product, Process and Functional Orientations. Principles and a Case Study. Preprints of the International Conference on Advanced Production Management Systems, APMS 2002 IFIP The Netherlands September.
  5. Anapindi, R., Chopra, S., Deshmukh, S. D., van Mieghem, J.A., Zemel, E. (1999). Managing Business Process Flows. Upper Saddle River NJ: Pretence Hall.
  6. Armistead, C.G., Rowland, P. (1996). Managing Business Processes: BPR and Beyond. Chichester John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Chan, M. (2002). A Framework to Develop an Enterprise Information Portal for Contract Manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 75 (1-2), 113-126.
  8. Damij, T. (2000). An Object-Oriented Methodology for Information Systems Development and Business Process Reengineering. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, Vol. 13, No. 4, 23-34.
  9. Davenport, T.H. (1993). Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
  10. Davenport, T.H., Short, J. (1990). The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign. Sloan Management Review, Vol. 31 No. 4, 11-27.
  11. Hammer, M. (1990). Reengineering work: Don't automate. Obliterate. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68 No. 4, 104-112.
  12. Hammer, M., Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation, A Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York, USA.
  13. Kettinger, W.J., Teng, J.TC., Guha, S. (1997). Business Process Change: A Study of Methodologies, Techniques and Tools. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, 55-80.
  14. Martinez, M., et al. (2001). Virtual Enterprise - Organisation, Evolution and Control. International Journal of Production Economics, 74 (1 - 3), 225- 238.
  15. Laguna, M, Marklund, J. (2005). Business Process Modeling, Simulation, and Design. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey.
  16. Watson H.G. (1994). Business Systems Engineering. Managing Breakthrough Changes for Productivity and Profit. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Damij N. (2009). AN EFFECTIVE PROCESS MODELLING TECHNIQUE . In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8111-86-9, pages 298-304. DOI: 10.5220/0002154402980304

in Bibtex Style

author={Nadja Damij},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
SN - 978-989-8111-86-9
AU - Damij N.
PY - 2009
SP - 298
EP - 304
DO - 10.5220/0002154402980304