entered the Bank of Portugal. The analysis 
concluded that the number of financial institutions 
with online presence is considerable big – most of 
the financial institutions have a website. This 
majority of EB platforms have a large percentage of 
EB services. 
4.2  Analysis and Presentation of 
Parameters to Assess 
To make the analysis and evaluation of a EB 
platforms sample, it was necessary to conduct a 
survey of different parameters to assess. Several 
authors (Guru et al., 2003; Awamleh and Fernandes, 
2005; Goi, 2006; Miranda et al., 2006; Al-
Mudimigh, 2007) consider essential the existence of 
information, transactional and communicative 
services, or relationship with the customer in the 
platforms of EB. Based on the analysis of features to 
be included in solutions of EB in the prospects of the 
mentioned authors, were set the following 
parameters for further evaluation:  
•  Quality of website; 
o  Accessibility 
o  Performance 
o  Navigability 
o  Content 
•  Informative functionalities; 
•  Transactional functionalities; 
•  Communicational functionalities. 
4.3  Definition of Platforms Sample to 
Evaluate 
The sample defined of EB platforms consists of the 
5 largest banks operating in Portugal in terms of 
financial assets and market share – CGD, BCP, BES, 
BPI and Banco Santander Totta (APB, 2007; BP, 
2008) and the bank BEST, a bank exclusively 
online. 
4.4  Evaluation of the Sample  
All EB platforms analyzed consist of two parts – a 
public part, available to any user, with informative 
content about the institution, its products and 
services available, and a private side, available only 
to customers with private credentials. To evaluate 
the accessibility and performance of platforms, were 
used some tools such as Total Validator, ATRC, 
World Wide Web Consortium, among others. In 
Figure 3 we can view the results of accessibility 
evaluation made with resource to the mentioned 
tools. 
 
Figure 3: Quality of platforms – accessibility. 
By analyzing the Figure 3 it is possible to check 
that the platform with the largest number of 
accessibility issues is Banco Santander Totta (BST) 
platform. To assess the navigability of platforms, 
some operations were carried out in order to gain 
sensitivity towards the various aspects while 
browsing in them. Regarding the platform’s quality, 
other parameters such as performance, navigability 
and content were evaluated, as shown in Figure 4. 
 
Figure 4: Quality of platforms – performance, navigability 
and content. 
To evaluate the response time, Total Validator 
was executed five times. As shown in the chart, the 
platform that presents a greater response time is the 
BPI’s, being the BEST, BES and Banco Santander 
Totta’s platforms those with a shorter response time, 
followed by the BCP and CGD platforms. 
In terms of navigability, it was attributed a quote 
(from 1 to 20) for each platform to the problems or 
constraints encountered along the navigation on the 
platforms. Regarding the content, each platform has 
its own layout, existing several similarities between 
them in terms of designation of operations and 
disposition of contents. After evaluating the quality 
of the sample, their functionalities were evaluated. 
Figure 5 reflects the results of these evaluations. 
Most of the evaluated platforms dispose the 
necessary functionalities for EB practices, respecting 
the defined evaluation parameters of the present 
study. 
CHARACTERIZATION OF e-BANKING TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS IN PORTUGAL
579