Carolina Howard Felicíssimo, Carlos José Pereira de Lucena, Jean-Pierre Briot



A major challenge in the research of multiagent systems (MAS) is the design and implementation of open MAS in which norms can be effectively applied to their agents and easily managed. These tasks are arduous because norms are usually written for general purposes, hindering a more precise regulation. The motivation for this research came forth from the need to resolve this challenge, providing an approach applicable in open systems. In such systems, heterogeneity and autonomy rule out any assumption concerning the way third-party entities are implemented and behaved. This paper summarizes the result of a study done on solutions for the modeling of MAS. That study motivates the development of our DynaCROM approach.


  1. Al-Muhtadi, J.; et al., 2003. Cerberus: a context-aware security scheme for smart spaces. In 1st IEEE International Conference On Pervasive Computing And Communications (PerCom 2003). p. 489- 496.
  2. Berners-Lee, T.; et al, 2001. The Semantic Web, Scientific American. 284(5), p. 34-43, May 2001.
  3. Boella, G.; et al, 2006. Introduction to normative multiagent systems. Journal of Comput. Math. Organ. Theory. v. 12, Issue 2-3, ISSN 1381-298X, p. 71-79.
  4. Coutinho, L. dos R.; et al, 2005. Modeling organization in MAS: a comparison of models. In 1st Workshop on Software Engineering for Agent-Oriented Systems.
  5. Coutinho, L. dos R.; et al., 2008. Modeling Dimensions for Multi-Agent Systems Organizations. In MultiAgent Systems: Semantics and Dynamics of Organizational Models book, IGI global.
  6. Corkill, D.D. and Lesser, V. 1983. The use of meta-level control for coordination in a distributed problem solving network. In 8th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, p. 748-756.
  7. Dignum, V., 2004. A Model for Organizational Interaction: based on Agents, founded in Logic. PhD Thesis.
  8. Dignum, F.; et al., 2007. Open Agent Systems. In 8th International Workshop on AOSE, USA.
  9. Esteva, M.; et al, 2002. ISLANDER: an electronic institutions editor. International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, p. 1045-1052.
  10. Esteva, M., 2003. Electronic Institutions: from specification to development. PhD thesis, Technical University of Catalonia.
  11. Esteva, M.; et al. 2004. AMELI: An Agent-based Middleware for Electronic Institutions. In 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, p. 236-243.
  12. Felicíssimo, C.; et al. 2007. Informing Regulatory Dynamics in Open MAS. In LNCS, v. 4386. p. 147-162.
  13. Felicíssimo, C. H.; et al, 2008a. Contextualizing Normative Open Multi-Agent Systems. In 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (ACM SAC).
  14. Felicíssimo, C.; et al., 2008b. DynaCROM: An Approach to Implement Regulative Norms in Normative Multiagent Systems. In 3th DEON'08 International Workshop on Normative Multiagent Systems (NorMAS).
  15. Felicíssimo, C.; et al. 2008c. How to Concretize Norms in NMAS? An Operational Normative Approach Presented with a Case Study from the Television Domain. In: COIN at AAAI'08.
  16. García-Camino, A.; et al. 2005. A Distributed Architecture for Norm-Aware Agent Societies. In Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT'05).
  17. García-Camino, A.; et al., 2006. Norm-Oriented Programming of Electronic Institutions: A Rule-based Approach. In: COIN@AAMAS2006, Japan.
  18. Grossi, D.; et al. 2007. A Formal Road from Institutional Norms to Organizational Structures. In AAMAS'07.
  19. Hannoun, M.; et al., 2000. MOISE: An organizational model for multi-agent systems. LNAI, v.1952, p.152-161.
  20. Henricksen, K. and Indulska, J. 2005. Developing contextaware pervasive computing applications: models and approach. Pervasive and Mobile Computing.
  21. Hewitt, C. Open Information Systems Semantics for Distributed Artificial Intelli-gence. Artificial Intelligence, v.47, I.1-3, 1991, p. 79-106, ISSN: 0004-3702.
  22. Hübner, J. F.; et al. 2002. A model for the structural, functional, and deontic specification of organizations in multiagent systems. LNAI, v. 2507. p. 118-128.
  23. Jennings, N.; et al., 1998. A Roadmap of Agent Research and Development. In JAAMAS, v. 1, p. 7-38.
  24. Jennings, N. R., 2001. An agent-based approach for building complex software systems. Communications of the ACM, 44(4), p. 35-41.
  25. Gasser, L.; et al., 1987. Distributed Artificial Intelligence, chapter MACE: A flexible testbed for distributed AI research, p. 119-152, Pitman Publishers.
  26. Lemaître C. and Excelente, C. B., 1998. Multi-agent organization approach. In 2nd Iberoamerican Workshop on DAI and MAS.
  27. Martín, F. J.; et al. 2000. An infrastructure for agent-based systems: An interagent approach. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 15(3), p. 217-240.
  28. Noriega, P., 1997. Agent-Mediated Auctions: The Fishmarket Metaphor. PhD thesis, Technical University of Catalonia.
  29. North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional change and Economics Performance. Cambridge, U.P..
  30. Omicini, A., 2001. Soda: Societies and infrastructures in the analysis and design of agent-based systems. In: LNAI, v. 1957, p. 185-193.
  31. Pattison, H.E.; et al., 1987. Distributed Artificial Intelligence, chapter Instantiating Descriptions of Organizational Structure, p. 59-96, Pitman Publishers.
  32. Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., 2001 On the Design and Construction of Agent-mediated Electronic Institutions, PhD thesis, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
  33. Scott, W. R., 1998. Organizations: rational, natural and open systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  34. Vázquez-Salceda, J. and Dignum, F., 2003. Modelling electronic organizations. In LNAI, v.2691, p.584-593.
  35. Vázquez-Salceda, J.; et al, 2005.. Organizing Multiagent Systems. In JAAMAS, 11(3), 2005, p. 307-360.
  36. Weiser, M., 1991. The computer for the twenty-first century. Scientific American, 265(3), p. 94-104.
  37. Werner, E., 1987. Distributed Artificial Intelligence. In: Chapter Cooperating Agents: A Unified Theory of Communication and Social Structure, p. 3-36.
  38. Winikoff, M. and Padgham, L., 2004. Developing Intelligent Agent Systems: A Practical Guide. Book. Published by John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 0-470-86120-7.
  39. Wooldridge, M.; et al., 2000. The Gaia Methodology for Agent-Oriented Analysis and Design. In: AAMAS, 3(3), p.285-312.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Felicíssimo C., Lucena C. and Briot J. (2009). MODELING OF OPEN NORMATIVE MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART, ISBN 978-989-8111-66-1, pages 540-546. DOI: 10.5220/0001663705400546

in Bibtex Style

author={Carolina Howard Felicíssimo and Carlos José Pereira de Lucena and Jean-Pierre Briot},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART,
SN - 978-989-8111-66-1
AU - Felicíssimo C.
AU - Lucena C.
AU - Briot J.
PY - 2009
SP - 540
EP - 546
DO - 10.5220/0001663705400546