
 
evaluate the LV are calculated. All data are stored in 
a database. 
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 
The Figure 1 depicts a block diagram of the 
developed system and shows how it is connected to 
the LV and lung simulator (LS). The LS acts as a 
physiological load (resistance and compliance) for 
the LV under assessment.  
The developed system consists of an electronic 
device that periodically measures the temperature 
and relative humidity (RH) of the air inside the duct 
that connects the LV to the LS as well as the flow 
and the pressure waveforms generated by the LV. 
The acquired data are sent to a PC microcomputer 
via radio frequency (RF). The PC shows the sampled 
data on the screen as well as parameters required by 
the IEC 60601-2-12.  
 
Figure 1: Block diagram of the system developed to assess 
LV performance. It also shows how the system is 
connected to the LV and LS. 
The next sections describe each block of the 
developed system. 
2.1  Transducer Module  
The transducer used to measure temperature and 
relative humidity (RH) is the SHT75 (Sensirion Inc, 
2007). It measures temperature from -40 to 123.8°C 
(accuracy: ±0.5°C; resolution: 0.01°C) and RH from 
0 to 100%RH (accuracy: ±1.8%RH; resolution: 
0.03%RH). These transducers have a calibration 
certificate issued by the manufacturer.  
Due to its small size (0.42 x 4.88 x 2.5 mm), it is 
possible to insert the transducer into the air duct that 
connects the LV to the LS. 
The SHT75 yields the measurements in digital 
format (14 bits) via a 2-wire protocol. This is a 
bidirectional protocol that allows the sensor to 
receive data such as commands to carry out the 
measurements.  
Before connecting the LV to the LS, the sensor is 
exposed to the environment, allowing the system to 
register the local temperature and RH. 
To sample the flow and pressure produced by the 
LV, two DC030NDC4 pressure transducers are used 
(Honeywell Inc., 2008). The DC030NDC4 measures 
the differential pressure applied to its inputs in a 
range of ±76.2cmH
2
O. It has a sensitivity of 
52.36mV/cmH
2
O, producing a voltage output of 
2.25V ± 2.0V. 
An acrylic apparatus containing an obstacle is 
placed between the LV and LS to create resistance to 
the gas flow (pneumotacograph - PT). The pressure 
drop across the resistance, measured by one of the 
transducers, is proportional to the flow velocity 
(Doeblin, 1990). The Figure 2 shows how the 
transducer inputs are connected to the PT apertures 
as well as a front view of the flow resistance. The 
pressure drop is positive for inspiratory flow and 
negative for expiratory flow. 
To relate the A/D converter voltage input (that is, 
the amplified and filtered differential pressure 
transducer voltage output) to flow, 40 different flow 
rates (20 positive and 20 negative) were applied to 
the PT and to a calibrated flow meter (Fluke 
Biomedical VT-Plus; uncertainty of ±1,1l/min for 
the -70 to +70l/min range). They were connected in 
series to allow the comparison of their 
measurements. An illustration of the experimental 
setup is shown in Figure 3. A polynomial of seventh 
order was fitted to the experimental points (voltage 
input versus flow rate measured by the calibrated 
meter) to allow inferring measures for flow rates not 
evaluated. Using the polynomial, the flow 
measurements obtained with the developed system 
have an uncertainty of ±4.4l/min. 
The second transducer, connected to a third 
aperture of the acrylic device, measures the 
difference between the atmospheric pressure and the 
one within the air duct.  
To calibrate this transducer, 35 pressure values 
(from 0 to 37.1cmH
2
O) were applied to the 
transducer and, in parallel, to a calibrated meter 
(Fluke Biomedical BP-Pump 2; uncertainty: 
±0.2cmH
2
O for a range from 0 to 120cmH
2
O). The 
conditioned voltage output of the transducer (as 
supplied to an A/D input) and the pressure readings 
obtained from the calibrated meter were annotated. 
From these values, a first order polynomial 
between voltage and pressure was obtained.
 
 
 
BIODEVICES 2009 - International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices
162