
 
life. Although customers were asked about the 
willingness to pay for the services, more realistic 
long term pilot should be conducted to find out real 
business potential of the services. Secondly, the 
selection of pilot participants was mainly based on 
the customers’ own eagerness. For example in the 
SmartParking case, the user segment of pilot 
customers was mainly restricted to frequent parkers. 
However, it would be important to know how 
customers who need parking services less frequently 
experience the service. Hence, future research 
should pay focus on different customer segments 
and their willingness to adopt NFC services. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
This work was done in the SmartTouch 
(www.smarttouch.org) project (ITEA 05024), which 
is a project within ITEA 2 (Information Technology 
for European Advancement), a EUREKA strategic 
cluster programme. The SmartTouch project has 
been partly funded by Tekes, the Finnish Funding 
Agency for Technology and Innovation. 
REFERENCES  
Anokwa, Y., Borriello, G., Pering T.  & Want, R. 2007. A 
user interaction model for NFC enabled applications. 
In Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on 
Pervasive Computing and Communications 
Workshops, 357–361. 
Balaban, D., 2007 NFC: Ready to Roll? Card Technology 
Today. 12(3). 
Bouwman, H., Carlsson, C., Molina-Castillo, F., Walden, 
P. 2007 Barriers and Drivers in the Adoption of 
Current and Future Mobile Services in Finland. 
Telematics and Informatics 24. 
Calvet, J.C., 2005 The Role of RFID in the Mobile Phone. 
Teletronik. 3(4). 
Carlsson, C., Hyvönen, K., Repo, P., Walden, P., 2005 
Asynchronous Adoption Patterns of Mobile Services. 
In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International 
Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer 
Society Press. 
Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of 
use, and user acceptance of information technology. 
MIS Quartely:13/1989, 319-339. 
Heijden, H., Valiente, P., 2002 The Value of Mobility for 
Business  Process Performance: Evidence from 
Sweden and the Netherlands. In ECIS 2002. 
Häikiö, J., Isomursu, M., Matinmikko, T., Wallin, A., 
Ailisto, H., Huomo, T., 2007 Touch-based user 
interface for elderly users. In Proceedings of 
MobileHCI, Singapore.  
Jaring, P., Törmänen, V., Siira, E., and Matinmikko, T., 
2007 Improving Mobile Solution Workflows and 
Usability Using Near Field Communication 
Technology. In Proceedings of the European 
Conference on Ambient Intelligence 2007, Darmstadt, 
Germany, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 358-
373. 
Kaasinen, E. 2005. User acceptance of mobile services – 
value, ease of use, trust and ease of adoption. Espoo: 
VTT Publications 566. http://www.vtt.fi/inf/ 
pdf/publications/2005/P566.pdf 
Kargin, B., Basoglu, N., 2006 Adoption Factors of Mobile 
Services. In ICMB’06 International Conference on 
Mobile Business. 
Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P.E., Thorbjornsen, H., 2005 
Intentions to Use Mobile Services: Antecedents and 
Cross-Service Comparisons. Journal of the Academy 
of Marketing Services 33(3). 
Riekki, J., Salminen, T., Alakärppä, I., 2006 Requesting 
Pervasive Services by Touching RFID Tags. Pervasive 
Computing. 5(1). 
Rogers, E., 1995 Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press. 
New York, 5
th
 edition. 
Rukzio, E., Leichtenstern, K., Callaghan, V., Holleis, P., 
Schmidt, A., Chin, J., 2006 An Experimental 
Comparison of Physical Mobile Interaction 
Techniques: Touching, pointing and scanning. In 
Dourish, P., Friday, A. (eds.) UbiComp 2006, The 8th 
International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. 
LNCS, vol. 4206, Springer, Heidelberg. 
Välkkynen, P., Niemelä, M., Tuomisto, T. 2006 
Evaluating Touching and Pointing with a Mobile 
Terminal for Physical Browsing. In NordiCHI 2006: 
Changing Roles. 
ICE-B 2008 - International Conference on e-Business
254