WEBSITE INTERACTIVITY - e-Commerce Usability Perspectives in Indonesia

Vincent Didiek Wiet Aryanto



Usability is a key factor of website that is commercially successful. Interactivity has been linked to website usability. This research confirms that improving website interactivity promotes website usability. In addition, the extension of previous research such as usability sub construct such as learn ability, memorability, efficiency, user error and self-efficacy are validated to improve the body of knowledge particularly on e-commerce research.


  1. Alba, J; Lynch, Weitz, B; Haniszewski, C. 1997. Interactive home shopping: consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, vol. 61, pp. 38-53.
  2. Ariely, D 2000. Controlling the information flow: Effects on consumers' decision-making and preferences. Journal of consumer research. Vol. 27 pp. 233 - 248.
  3. Bandura A.1996. Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67, 3. 1206-22.
  4. Chatterjee, P; Hoffman, D.L; Novak, T.P.2003. Modeling the clickstream: Implication web-based advertising efforts. Marketing Science, 22 (4), 520-541.
  5. Coyle, JR and Thorson, E.2001. The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness of in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising. Vol. 30 (3), pp 13-28.
  6. Chen, K and Yen, DC. 2004. Improving the quality of online presence through interactivity. Information & Management, Vol. 42. pp.217-226.
  7. Dias, P, Gomes, M J and Correia, AP. 1999 Disorientation in Hypermedia: Environments: mechanisms to support navigation, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 2 93-117.
  8. Fiore, AM and Jin, HJ. 2003. Influence of image interactivity on approach responses towards and online retailer. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy. Vol. 13 (1), pp.38-48.
  9. Ha, L and James E. 1998. Interactivity re-examined: A baseline analysis of early business websites. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, Vol.42 pp.457-74.
  10. Kompas 2004. Industri tekstil Indonesia bisa bangkit lagi dengan e-business. (Indonesian Textile Industries can be revitalized again by e-business) downloaded at on September 12nd, 2007.
  11. Khalifa, M and Liu, V. 2003. The role of expectations and desires. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol.7 pp. 31-49
  12. Klein, L. 2003. Creating virtual product experiences: The role of tele-presence. Journal of Interactive Marketing. Vol.17 (1), pp. 41-55.
  13. Lohse, G.L., Bellman, S and Johnson, E.J., 2000. Consumer buying behavior on the internet: findings from panel data. Journal of Interactive Marketing, vol. 14 (1) pp.15-29.
  14. Li, H., Daugherty, T and Biocca, F. 2001. Characteristics of virtual experience in electronic commerce research: a protocol analysis. Journal of Interactive Marketing. Vol.15 (3). Pp13-30.
  15. Liu, Y. and L.J Shrum. 2002. What is interactivity and is it always such good thing? Implication s of definition, person and situation for the influence of interactivity or advertising influence. Journal of Advertising, Vol. 31 pp. 53-64.
  16. Liu, Y. 2003. Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites. Journal of Advertising vol. 42, pp. 207-216.
  17. Lowry, P.B; Spaulding, T; Wells, T; Moody, G; Moffit, K and Madariga, S. 2006. A Theoretical model and empirical result linking website interactivity and usability satisfaction. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International conference on system sciences. Hawaii.
  18. Macias, W. 2003. A preliminary structural equation model of comprehension and persuasion of interactive advertising brand websites. Journal of Interactive Aadvertising. Vol 3 (2). Available at
  19. Mathwick, C. 2002. Understanding the online consumer: a typology of online relational norms and behavior. Journal of Interactive Marketing. Vol. 16(1). Pp. 40-55.
  20. McKinney, V., Kanghyun, and Zahedi, FM. 2002. Measurement of web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information System Research. Vol. 13 pp. 296-315.
  21. Nielsen, J. 2001. Alertbox: usability metrics. Vol. 2004, Nielsen Norman. Group.
  22. Pavlik 1996. New media technology: cultural and commercial perspectives. Boston MA, USA: Allyn and Bacon.
  23. Stomer, J and Galley. 2000. Online interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication. Vol 50 pp.111-132.
  24. Sundar, SS; Kalyanaraman and Brown, J. 2003. Communication Research. Vol. 30 pp. 30-59.
  25. Strauss, J and Frost, R. 1999. Marketing in the Internet: principles of online marketing. Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  26. Shneiderman, B. 2000. Designing trust into online experience. Communication of ACM. Vol. 43, pp. 57-59.
  27. Wu, G 1999. Perceived interactivity and attribute toward website. Presented at Annual conference of American Academy of Advertising. Albuquerque. NM USA.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Didiek Wiet Aryanto V. (2008). WEBSITE INTERACTIVITY - e-Commerce Usability Perspectives in Indonesia . In Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Business - Volume 1: ICE-B, (ICETE 2008) ISBN 978-989-8111-58-6, pages 464-469. DOI: 10.5220/0001910604640469

in Bibtex Style

author={Vincent Didiek Wiet Aryanto},
title={WEBSITE INTERACTIVITY - e-Commerce Usability Perspectives in Indonesia},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Business - Volume 1: ICE-B, (ICETE 2008)},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Business - Volume 1: ICE-B, (ICETE 2008)
TI - WEBSITE INTERACTIVITY - e-Commerce Usability Perspectives in Indonesia
SN - 978-989-8111-58-6
AU - Didiek Wiet Aryanto V.
PY - 2008
SP - 464
EP - 469
DO - 10.5220/0001910604640469