Roger Tagg



There appears to be evidence that much potential IT support for group work is yet to be widely adopted or to achieve significant benefits. It has been suggested that, in order to achieve better results when applying IT to group work, designers should take more notice of modern philosophies that avoid the so-called "Cartesian Dualism" of mind separated from matter. It is clear that group work support is more than a matter of automating formal procedures. This paper reviews the question from the author’s lifetime of experience as a consultant, academic and group worker; proposes some models to address some of the missing perspectives in current approaches; and suggests how future efforts could be re-orientated to achieve better outcomes.


  1. Bellotti, V., Dalal, B., Good, N., Flynn, P., Bobrow, D. and Ducheneaut, N., 2004. What a To-Do: Studies of Task Management. In CHI Conference, Vienna.
  2. Checkland, P. and and Scholes, J., 1999. Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley.
  3. Ciborra, C., 2002. The Labyrinths of Information, Oxford University Press.
  4. Constantine, L., 2007. From Activity Theory to Design Practice. Keynote presentation, ICEIS Conference, Madeira.
  5. Cordeiro, J. and Filipe, J., 2004a. Language Action Perspective, Organizational Semiotics and the Theory of Organized Activity - A Comparison, DEMO Conference.
  6. Cordeiro, J. and Filipe, J., 2004b. The Semiotic Pentagram Framework. In Organisational Semiotics Conference.
  7. Czerwinski, M., 2006. From Scatterbrained to Focused: UI Support for Today's Crazed Information Worker. In SIGIR Workshop on Personal Information Management, Seattle.
  8. Dietz, J., 1999. Understanding and Modeling Business Processes with DEMO. In Entity Relationship Conference, Paris.
  9. Drucker, P., 1954. The Practice of Management, Harper and Row.
  10. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., Punamäki, R.-L. (Eds). 1999. Perspectives on activity theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Heath, T., 2003. The Question of the Meaning of Being - Making Sense of Martin Heidegger's Being and Time. Notes/ (accessed 16 Nov 2007)
  12. Heidegger, M., 1926. Being and Time, translation 1996 by Stambaugh, J., State University of New York Press.
  13. Hesse, W. and Verrijn-Stuart, A., 1999. Towards a Theory of Information Systems: The FRISCO Approach. In Report of ISCO-4 Conference, Leiden.
  14. Hirschheim, R. and Klein, H., 2003. Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline. Journal of AIS, October.
  15. Holt, A., 1997. Organized Activity and Its Support by Computer, Springer.
  16. Goldkuhl, G., 2006. Action and Media in Interorganizational Interaction. CACM 49(5).
  17. Kent, W., 1978. Data and Reality, AuthorHouse.
  18. Kirsh, D., 2000. A Few Thoughts on Cognitive Overload, Intellectica.
  19. Leont'ev, A. N., 1977. Activity and consciousness. In Philosophy in the USSR, Problems of Dialectical Materialism. Progress Publishers. http:// 77.htm (Accessed 13 March 2008)
  20. Lewis, D., 1990. Parts of Classes, Blackwell.
  21. Lyytinen, K., 2004. The Struggle with Language in the IT - Why is LAP not in the Mainstream? In 9th Inernational Working Conference on LAP on Communication Modelling.
  22. Martin, J., 1989. Strategic Information Planning Methodologies, Prentice Hall.
  23. Medina-Mora, R., Winograd, T., Flores, R. and Flores, F., 1992. The Action Workflow Approach to Workflow Management Technology. In CSCW Conference.
  24. Mingers, J. and Willcocks, L., 2004. Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems, Wiley
  25. Muller, M., Geyer, W., Brownholtz, B., Wilcox, E. and Millen, D., 2004. One-Hundred Days in an ActivityCentric Collaboration Environment based on Shared Objects. In CHI Conference, Vienna.
  26. Mumford, E., 1995. Effective Systems Design and Requirements Analysis: the ETHICS Method, Macmillan.
  27. Nardi, B, 1996. Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, chapter 1 of Activity Theory, MIT Press.
  28. Nobre, A., 2007a. Action, Language and Social Semiotics. Poster at Workshop on Computer Supported Activity Coordination, ICEIS Conference Madeira.
  29. Nobre, A., 2007b. Organizational Learning and Heidegger's Ontology. Poster at ICEIS Conference, Madeira.
  30. Roget, P., 1996. Roget's Thesaurus, Penguin.
  31. Scott, A., 2007. Heidegger's Being and Time. ml (accessed 16 Nov 2007).
  32. Searle, J., 1969. Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press
  33. Shumarova, E. and Swatman, P., 2007. Organizational Impact of Collaboration Information Technologies. Working paper, CreWS (Creative Work Support) research project, University of South Australia
  34. Stamper, R., 1973. Information in Business and Administrative Systems, Wiley.
  35. Tagg, R., 2008. Personal Home Page, http:// (accessed 13 March 2008)
  36. Townsend, R., 1988. Further Up the Organisation. HarperCollins.
  37. Tungare, M., Pyla, P., Sampat, M. and Perez-Quiñones, M., 2006. Defragmenting Information using the Syncables Framework. In SIGIR Workshop on Personal Information Management, Seattle.
  38. Whittaker S. and Sidner C., 1996. Email Overload: Exploring Personal Information Management of Email. In ACM Conference on Computer-Human Interaction.
  39. Wiener, P (Ed), 1958. Charles S Peirce: Selected Writings, Dover.
  40. Wilson, M., Joffe, R. and Wilkerson, B., 2000. The Unheralded Business Crisis in Canada - Depression at Work. GPC Canada, http://www.mental report_Jul20.pdf (accessed 16 Nov 2007).

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Tagg R. (2008). IS THERE A ROLE FOR PHILOSOPHY IN GROUP WORK SUPPORT? . In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 6: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8111-38-8, pages 89-96. DOI: 10.5220/0001677200890096

in Bibtex Style

author={Roger Tagg},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 6: ICEIS,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 6: ICEIS,
SN - 978-989-8111-38-8
AU - Tagg R.
PY - 2008
SP - 89
EP - 96
DO - 10.5220/0001677200890096