Mounir Kehal



Formats to handle knowledge of innovative organizations may prove to be complex, as such is assumed to be one of the main variables whilst a distinguishing factor of such organizations to survive within a marketplace. Their main asset is the knowledge of certain highly motivated individuals that appear to share a common vision for the continuity of the organization. Satellite technology is a good example of that. From early pioneers to modern day mini/micro satellites and nanotechnologies, one can see a large amount of risk at every stage in the development of a satellite technology, from inception to design phase, from design to delivery, from lessons learnt from failures to those learnt from successes, and from revisions to design and development of successful satellites. In their groundbreaking book The Knowledge Creating Company (1995), Nonaka et al laid out a model of how organisational knowledge is created through four conversion processes, being from: tacit to explicit (externalisation), explicit to tacit (internalisation), tacit to tacit (socialisation), and explicit to explicit (combination). Key to this model is the authors’ assertion that none are individually sufficient. All must be present to fuel one another. However, such knowledge creation and diffusion was thought to have manifested and only applied within large organizations and conglomerates. Observational (questionnaire-based) and systematic (corpus-based) studies – through case study elicitation experiments and analysis of specialist text, can support research in knowledge management. Organizations that manufacture, use, and maintain satellites depend on a continuous exchange of ideas, criticisms, and congratulations. One can regard such organisations from NASA to SSTL as amongst a class of knowledge-based organizations. Through selective use of the previously stated approaches, and concise reporting for the purposes of this paper we are to show how knowledge flows in a finite organisational setting and could be modelled by specialist text.


  1. Atkins, S. Clear, J. Ostler, N. 1992. “Corpus Design Criteria”. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 7(1), 1- 16.
  2. Bauere, L. 2001. “Morphological productivity”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (Cambridge studies in linguistics; 95).
  3. Biber, D. Conrad, S. Reppen, R. 2002. “Corpus Linguistics: investigating language structure and use”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Burrows, J. F. 1992. “Computers and the Study of Literature”, pp: 167-204. Oxford: Blackwell.
  5. Gruber, T.R. 1993. “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification”. Knowledge Acquisition, Vol. 5, 199-220.
  6. Holmes, D. I. 1998. “The Evolution of Stylometry in Humanities Scholarship”. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 13: 111-17.
  7. Liebowitz, J. 2000. “Building organisational intelligence: A knowledge management primer”, Boca Raton, CRC Press.
  8. Nonaka, I. Takeuchi, K. 1995. “The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies create the Dynamics of Innovation”. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  9. Sinclair, J. 1991. “Corpus, Concordance, Collocation“. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  10. Sperberg-McQueen, C. M. 1991. “Text in the Electronic Age: Textual Study and Text Encoding, with Examples from Medieval Texts”. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 6/1: 34-46.
  11. Stemler, S. 2001. “An Overview of Content Analysis”. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17). http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17. A peerreviewed electronic journal. ISSN 1531-7714. Last Accessed [15/11/2002].
  12. Surrey Space Centre (University of Surrey) - SSTL (Surrey Satellite Technology Limited), George Edwards Library (University of Surrey), collection of text documents 1979-2002, http://www.surrey.ac.uk/Library, http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/SSC/, www.sstl.co.uk.
  13. Swedish Space Corp, collection of text documents, historical corpus 1997-2002. http://www.ssc.se.
  14. Yin, R. 1994. “Case study research: Design and methods”. (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Kehal M. (2007). SPECIALIST KNOWLEDGE DIFFUSION . In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS, ISBN 978-972-8865-89-4, pages 49-56. DOI: 10.5220/0002344100490056

in Bibtex Style

author={Mounir Kehal},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS,
SN - 978-972-8865-89-4
AU - Kehal M.
PY - 2007
SP - 49
EP - 56
DO - 10.5220/0002344100490056