Maha Bali, Aziza El-Lozy, Herb Thompson



Does computer-mediation enhance student performance or student interest in the learning process? In this paper we present the somewhat tentative results of an experiment carried out in teaching/learning methodology and pedagogy. The goal of the experiment was to examine, compare and elicit results to identify the differences, if any, in learning outcomes between two classes. One class was taught using computer-mediated technologies in conjunction with “active” learning pedagogical principles; and the other class was taught by the same instructor with identical course syllabi and textbook, but using a more conventional approach of lectures and tests to achieve learning.


  1. Ahern, T. and El-Hindi, A. E. (2000). Improving the instructional congruency of a computer-mediated small-group discussion: A case study in design and delivery. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(3), 385-596.
  2. Aiken, G. (1991). Self-directed learning in introductory management. Journal of Management Education, 15, 295-312.
  3. Alie, R., Beam, H. and Carey, T. (1998). The use of teams in an undergraduate management program. Journal of Management Education, 22, 707-719.
  4. Bailey, E. and Cotlar, E. (1994). Teaching via the Internet. Communication Education, 43, 184-193.
  5. Boyatiz, R. (1994). Stimulating self-directed learning through the managerial assessment and development course. Journal of Management Education, 18, 304- 323.
  6. Brahler, C.J., Peterson, N.S. and Johnson, E.C. (2000). Developing on-line material for higher education: an overview of current issues. Education Technology and Society, 3(1), 42-54.
  7. Cheng, W. and Warren, M. (2000). Making a Difference: using peers to assess individual students' contributions to a group project. Teaching in Higher Education 5(2), 243-255.
  8. Crook, C.K. (1997). Making hypertext lecture notes more interactive: undergraduate reactions. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 13, 236-244.
  9. Edwards, M.A. and Clear, F. (2001). Supporting the Collaborative Learning of Practical Skills with Computer-Mediated Communications Technology. Educational Technology and Society, 4(1) [WWW page]. URL ml
  10. Ellsworth, J. (1994). Education on the Internet. Indiana: Sams Publishing.
  11. Fuller, Dorothy, Norby, Rena F., Pearce, Kristi and Strand, Sharon (2000). Internet Teaching By Style: Profiling the On-line Professor. Educational Technology & Society, 3(2) [WWW page]. URL Harasim, L. (1993). Collaborating in cyberspace: Using computer conferences as a group learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 3(2), 119-130.
  12. Kirkpatrick, D. and McLaughlan, R. (2000). Flexible lifelong learning in professional education. Education Technology and Society, 3(1), 24-31.
  13. Light, P., Colbourn, C. and Light, V. (1997). Computer mediated tutorial support for conventional courses. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 13, 228-235.
  14. Malinger, M. (1998). Maintaining control in the classroom by giving up control. Journal of Management Education 22, 43-56.
  15. McCuddy, M.K. and Pirie, W.L (2004). Using teams in the classroom: Meeting the challenge of evaluating student's work. In Ottewill, R., Borredon, L., Falque, L., Macfarlane, B. and Wall, A. Educational Innovation in Economics and Business: Pedagogy, Technology and Innovation (Volume VIII, pp.147- 160). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  16. McAteer, E., Tolmie, A., Duffy, C. and Corbett, J. (1997). Computer-mediated communication as a learning resource. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 13, 219-227.
  17. McKeachie, W. (1997). Student ratings: the validity of use. American Psychologist 52, November, 1218- 1225.
  18. Muffoletto, R. (1997). Reflections on Designing and Producing an Internet-Based Course. TechTrends, 42(2), 50-53.
  19. Ragoondden, Karen and Bordeleau, Pierre (2000). Collaborative Learning via the Internet. Educational Technology & Society, 3(3) [WWW page]. URL Ramsey, V. and Couch, P. (1994). Beyond self-directed learning: A partnership model of teaching learning. Journal of Management Education, 18, 139-161.
  20. Repman, J. & Logan, S. (1996). Interactions at a Distance: Possible Barriers and Collaborative Solutions. TechTrends, November/December, 35-38.
  21. Salomon, G. Perkins, D. and Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in Cognition: Extending Human Intelligence with Intelligent Technologies. Educational Researcher 20(3), April, 2-9.
  22. Sosabowski, M.H., Herson, K. and Lloyd, A.W. (1998). Enhancing learning and teaching quality: integration of networked learning technologies into undergraduate modules. Active Learning, 8, 20-25.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Bali M., El-Lozy A. and Thompson H. (2006). REDESIGNING INTRODUCTORY ECONOMICS - Techno-collaborative Learning . In Proceedings of WEBIST 2006 - Second International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 2: WEBIST, ISBN 978-972-8865-47-4, pages 157-163. DOI: 10.5220/0001238001570163

in Bibtex Style

author={Maha Bali and Aziza El-Lozy and Herb Thompson},
title={REDESIGNING INTRODUCTORY ECONOMICS - Techno-collaborative Learning},
booktitle={Proceedings of WEBIST 2006 - Second International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 2: WEBIST,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of WEBIST 2006 - Second International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 2: WEBIST,
SN - 978-972-8865-47-4
AU - Bali M.
AU - El-Lozy A.
AU - Thompson H.
PY - 2006
SP - 157
EP - 163
DO - 10.5220/0001238001570163