Manuel João Pereira, Luís Valadares Tavares, Raquel Soares



The output of investments in Information Systems and Technologies (IST) has been a topic of debate among the IST research community. The “Productivity Paradox of IST Investments” sustains that the investment in IST does not increase productivity. Some researchers showed that developed countries have been having a rather stable and sometimes declining economic growth despite their efforts in Research and Development (R&D). Other researchers argue that there is sound evidence that investments in IST are having impacts on the productivity and competitiveness of countries. This paper analyses the relationship between IST and R&D investments and the global development of countries (not only productivity of countries) using economic, demographic and literacy independent variables that explain global development. The objective is to research whether R&D and IST investments are critical to the productivity and to global development of the countries. Working at a country level, the research used sixteen socio-economic variables during a period of five years (1995-1999). The research methodology included causal forecast, cluster analysis, factor analysis, discriminant analysis and regression analysis. The conclusion confirms the correlation between the Gross National Product (GNP) and R&D and IST investments. The variables illiteracy rate, life expectancy at birth, Software investment as percentage of GNP and number of patents per 1000 inhabitants can explain the development of a country.


  1. Ackoff, R.L., (1967). “Management Misinformation Systems”, Management Science, 14, 4, B140-B156, December.
  2. Allen, D. (1997). “Where's the Productivity Growth (from the information Technology Revolution)?”, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, March/April, 79,2,15-25.
  3. Alpar, P. and Kim M. A. (1991). “Microeconomic Approach to the Measurement of Information Technology Value”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 2, 55-69.
  4. Arrow (1962). “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing”. Economic Studies, 29.
  5. Bauker, R. D. and Kauffman, R. J. (2004), “The Evolution of Research on Information Systems: a fiftieth- year Survey of the Literature in Management Science”, Management Science, Vol. 50, nº 3. March 2004, pp. 281-298.
  6. Baily, M.N. and Gordon, R.J. (1998). “The Productivity Slowdown, Measurement Issues and the Explosion of Computer Power”. In Brainard, W.C. and Perry, G.L. (eds) Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 347-431.
  7. Barua, A., Kriebel, C. H., Mukhopadhyay, T., (1991). “An Economic Analysis of Strategic Information Technology Investments”, MIS Quarterly, September, pp. 313-332.
  8. Barua, A., Kriebel, C. H., Mukhopadhyay, T., (1995). “Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation”, Information Systems Research 6(1), pp. 3-23.
  9. Brynjolfsson, E. e Hitt, L. (1996). “Productivity, Business Profitability and Consumer Surplus: Three different measures of Information Technology Value”, MIS Quarterly, 20, 2, 121-142, June.
  10. Brynjolfsson, E. e Hitt, L., (1999). “Paradox Lost? Firm level evidence on the returns to Information Systems Spending”. In Willcocks, L. e Lester S. “Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox”, Wiley, pp. 39-68.
  11. Byrd, T. and Marshall, T. (1997). “Relating Information Technology Investment to Organizational Performance”. Omega, 25, 1, 43-56.
  12. Castells, M. (1997), “The End of the Millennium, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture”, Vol. III, Cambridge, MA, Backwell.
  13. Conlisk (1969). “A Neoclassical Growth Model with Endogenously Positioned Technical Change Frontiers”. Economic Journal, nº 79.
  14. David (1990). “The Dynamo and the Computer”. American Economic Review, nº 80.
  15. Devaraj, S. and Kohli (2003). “Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is actual usage the missing link?”, Management Science, 49, 11-273-289.
  16. Grossman (1991). “Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy”. MIT Press.
  17. Gurbaxani, V. and Whang, S., (1991). “The impact of Information Systems on Organisations and Markets”, Communications of the ACM, 34, nº1, January.
  18. Im, K.S., Dow, K.E. e Grover V. (2001), “Research Report: A Reexamination of IT Investment and the Market Value of the Firm - an event study methodology”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 12, nº1, pp. 103-117.
  19. Jones (1995). “Time Series Tests of Endogenous Growth Models”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 11; 27-32.
  20. Kraemer, K. and Dedrick, J. (1996). “IT and Economic Development: International Competitiveness”. In Dutton, W (ed.), Information and Communication Technologies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  21. Kurdas (1994), “Theories of Technological Change and Investment”. John Wiley.
  22. Laudon, K., (1974). “Computers and Bureaucratic Reform”. New York: John Willey.
  23. Laudon, K., (1986). “The Dossier Society: value choices in the design of National Information Systems”. New York: Columbia University Press.
  24. Mckeen, J., Smith, H. and Parent, M. (1997). “Assessing the Value of Information Technology: the leverage effect”. Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Information Systems, Cork, June 9-12th , 11; 77-89.
  25. Nissen, H.E., Klein, H.K. and Hirscheim; R. (1998), “Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions”. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  26. OECD (2002), Technology and the Economy: Key Relationships.
  27. Orlikowski, W. J. (1996). “Improvising Organizational Transformation over time: A Situated Change Perspective”. Information Systems Research, Volume 7, Number 1, pp. 63-92.
  28. Pereira, M.J. (2004) “Impacts of information systems and technology on productivity and competitiveness of the Portuguese banking sector: an empirical study, International Transactions in Operational Research, Vol. 11, nº 9, January 2004, 11; 43-63.
  29. Phelps (1966). “Models of Technical Progress and the Golden Rule of Research”. Review of Economic Studies, 33.
  30. Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
  31. Romer (1990), “Endogenous Technological Change”. Journal of Political Economy, 98.
  32. Shell (1967). “A Model of Innovative Activity and Capital Accumulation”, Essays on the Theory of Optimal Economic Growth, Conference Proceedings, 11; 1-29.
  33. Soete (1996). “Uncertainty and Technological Change”, Technology and Growth Conference Proceedings, 11; 27-39.
  34. Strassman, P. (1997). “The Squaudered Computer”. Information Economics Press, New Canaan.
  35. Tavares, L. (2003), “Engineering and Technology: 2000 - 2020; Foresight Challenges for Portugal”, Verbo.
  36. Uzawa (1965). “Optimum Technical Change in an Aggregate Model of Economic Growth”. International Economic Review ,6.
  37. Willcocks, L. and Lester S. (1999). “In Search of Information Technology Productivity: Assessment Issues”. In Willcocks, L. e Lester S. (eds.) “Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox”, Wiley, pp. 69-98.
  38. Young (1998). “Growth without Scale Effects”. Journal of Political Economy,106.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

João Pereira M., Valadares Tavares L. and Soares R. (2005). SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES - A Socio-Economic Analysis . In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 972-8865-19-8, pages 81-88. DOI: 10.5220/0002551000810088

in Bibtex Style

author={Manuel João Pereira and Luís Valadares Tavares and Raquel Soares},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
SN - 972-8865-19-8
AU - João Pereira M.
AU - Valadares Tavares L.
AU - Soares R.
PY - 2005
SP - 81
EP - 88
DO - 10.5220/0002551000810088