
The emerging of the Internet has accentuated the 
need for supporting a broad diffusion of information 
and the openness of EISs. To meet these needs, user-
friendly interfaces must be based on HTTP protocol 
(Riva and Ramoni, 1996) and HTML. So, user 
interfaces should benefit from standards of scripting 
programming languages such as JavaScript 
(Flanagan, 2002) for increasing the interactivity with 
users. 
The distribution of components of an EIS can be 
realized by coupling Web technologies and 
distributed object approaches (Brose et al., 2002) 
such as CORBA or COM, including a Java 
implementation of its specifications. The resulting 
platform built on top of this kind of association are 
opened, and characterized by the following 
properties: 
(a)  Neutrality of the platform. Means independent 
of the underlying operating system and 
hardware architecture. 
(b)  Portability  of components. Components of an 
EIS can be moved from one platform to another, 
with little effort, by adapting the new 
component for its integration in an already 
existing EIS. 
(c)  Distribution. The user interface managed by 
the Web browser is completely separated from 
the server that supports the processing and the 
storage of data. Interoperable tools which make 
up an EIS are installed on different computers. 
This way of distributing components of an EIS, by 
using the Web as support, is adopted by different 
approaches, which are grouped here in two 
categories. The difference between these proposals 
lies in methods the Web accesses legacy server 
applications and their data. Data integration issue for 
business intelligence presented in this paper differs 
from the above solutions by its openness. The future 
of this work will study the issues presented above. 
REFERENCES 
David, A., and O., Thierry, 2004. EQuA2te Architecture 
and its application in Business Intelligence. Business 
Intelligence: Research & Applications Conference - 
IERA 2003 - Nancy, France. 
Acta, 1999. ActaWorks™ RealTime Technical Overview: 
A Data Integration Platform For eCommerce And 
Business Intelligence. A White Paper - Acta 
Technology. http://www.acta.com. 
Boudjlida, N., and O., Perrin, 1995. An Open Approach 
for Data Integration. In 2nd Int. Conf. on Object-
Oriented Information Systems (OOIS'95), Dublin. 
Brose, G., et al., 2002. JacORB Programming Guide 
1.4.1. Freie Universität Berlin and Xtradyne 
Technologies AG. 
Brown, A., W., 1992. Control Integration through 
Message Passing in a Software Development 
Environment. Technical Report, CMU/SEI-92-TR-35. 
Brown, A., W., and K., C., Wallnau, 1996. Engineering of 
Component-Based Systems. Component-Based 
Software Engineering: Selected Papers from the 
Software Engineering Institute. IEEE CS Press. 
Builders, 1999. The Critical Role of Business Intelligence 
in e-Business. A White Paper - Information Builders 
Dossick, S., E., and G., E., Kaiser, 1996. WWW Access to 
Legacy Client/Server Applications. Computer 
Networks and ISDN Systems, The International 
Journal of Computer and Telecommunications 
Networking, 28(7-11):931-940, Elsevier Science B.V. 
Enosys, 2002. Enterprise Information Integration: 
Integrating the Real-time Enterprise. Business White 
Paper 8 Enosys Software Confidential. 
ETI, 2002:. Data integration management for the 
enterprise. The ETI solution TM version 5. 
Evolutionary Technologies International. 
http://www.eti.com. 
Flanagan D., 2002. JavaScript: The Definitive Guide, 4
th 
Edition. Sebastopol, Ca.: O’Reilly. 
Informatica, 2000. Business Intelligence and the New 
World of E-business. A White Paper WP1049-B. 
Informatica. www.informatica.com 
Kiper, J., D., 1994. A Framework for Characterization of 
the Degree of Integration of Software Tools. Journal 
of System Integration, No. 4, pp. 5-32. 
Reiss, S., P., 1994. The FIELD Programming 
Environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 
Riva, A., and M., Ramoni, 1996. LispWeb: a specialized 
HTTP server for distributed AI applications. Computer 
Networks and ISDN Systems, 28(711):953-961, 1996. 
SoftBench, 2002. Integrating with HP SoftBench. HP-UX 
STK version 1.8.1. Hewlett-Packard. 
SOM, 1994. The System Object Model (SOM) and the 
Component Object Model (COM): A comparison of 
technologies from a developer's perspective. IBM 
Corporation, Object Technology Products Group 
Thomas, I., and B., A., Nejmeh, 1992. Definitions of Tool 
Integration for environments. IEEE Software Vol. 9, 
N° 3, pp 29-35. 
Tiako, P., F., 1998. Modeling the Federation of Process 
Sensitive Engineering Environments: Basics Concepts 
and Perspectives. In Software Process Technology (V. 
Gruhn, Eds) - LNCS Vol. 1487, Springer-Verlag. 
Wasserman, A., I., 1990. Tool Integration in Software 
Engineering Environments. In Software Engineering 
Environments. International Workshop on 
Environments, LNCS N° 467, pp.137-149. 
WSMO, 2004. Web Service Modeling Language, 
www.wsmo.org. 
DATA INTEGRATION ISSUES FOR BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE INTEGRATED ENTERPRISE INFORMATION
SYSTEMS
369