
 
(W3C, 2004) and included in the GUI based 
software.  
The styles of the text characters are yet suggested 
to satisfy usability guidelines: Times, Verdana, 
Tahoma, Arial, Helvetica.  
To ensure perfect readability, even the size of the 
characters can be chosen among a minimum of 8 pts,  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Figure 5: The fast style prototyper. In this environment 
the web developer can choose some presentation aspects 
about the page areas drawn before. The developer can set 
text and background colours to ensure a good reading. The 
colours can also be chosen according to the sensations that 
the site must transmit, depending on the culture of the 
typical Internet user. On the left the created styles can be 
associated with the page areas drawn in the prototyping 
tool. 
 
10 pts (preferable), 12 pts for people with visual 
deficiencies or bigger ones. Since at the moment the 
human computer interaction is not as complete as in 
real world, every web object must be carefully 
chosen to make the final user feel fine. So it is 
important to choose colours correctly to 
communicate the right sensations. Our software 
helps the web developer by giving him the 
correspondence between every colour and its 
meaning in various cultures (western, oriental, ...). 
That is very useful if the web site is not a world site, 
but a regional site or a site for a specific group of 
users. 
5 CONCLUSIONS 
The idea to include the colours constraint for text 
and background proves to be valuable, since, 
according to a web analysis, at least the 33% of the 
observed pages doesn't satisfy the colours 
requirements. Forcing (or warning) the web 
developer to follow usability guidelines, produces 
better web presentations, and shorter release times. 
However it must be kept in mind that the presence of 
usability professionals might still be a necessity, as 
in complex cases the software can only help the 
human decisions. 
The code generation has been thought to be 
based on HTML plus CSS, since the CSS and the 
box model are an easy way to generate the page 
areas drown in the fast prototyping environment. 
The tool under evaluation, and the 
methodologies illustrated, will improve the Internet 
users satisfaction and will shorten the web sites 
time-to-market with advantages for developers and 
clients. 
The EUWI CASE tool still needs to be properly 
tested for a final release. The usability 
methodologies (the ones that could be automated) 
have been identified, specified and included in our 
tool. 
REFERENCES 
Nielsen, J., 2003. Designing Web Usability: The practice 
of simplicity, New Riders Press. 
Fraternali, P., 1999. Tools and Approaches for developing 
Data-Intensive Web Applications: A Survey, ACM 
Computing Surveys, Vol. 31, No. 3, September 1999. 
Becker, S. A., Berkemeyer, A., 2002. Rapid Application 
Design and Testing of Web Usability, Multimedia 
IEEE, Vol.9, Issue:4, Oct.-Dec. 2002, Pages: 38-46. 
Ceri, S., Fraternali, P., Bongio, A., Brambilla, M., Comai, 
S., Matera, M., 2003. Progettazione di dati e 
applicazioni per il web, McGraw-Hill, Milano. 
Internet: http://www.webml.org 
 Internet: http://www.webratio.com 
Newman, M. W., Landay, J. A., 2000. Sitemaps, 
Storyboards, and Specifications: A Sketch of Web Site 
Design Practice, Symposium on Designing Interactive 
Systems, Proceedings of the Conference on Designing 
Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, 
and Techniques, New York City, United States, 
Pages:263-274, ACM Press. 
Hammar Cloyd, M., 2001. Designing User-Centered Web 
Applications in Web Time, Software IEEE, Vol.18, 
Issue:1, Jan.-Feb. 2001, Pages:62-69. 
Conallen, J.,2003. Building Web Applications with UML, 
Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series, Boston. 
W3C, 2004. Techniques for Accessibility Evaluation and 
Repair Tools. (n.d.). Retrieved November 8, 2004, 
from: http://www.w3.org/TR/AERT 
WEBIST 2005 - WEB INTERFACES AND APPLICATIONS
376