TUNING THE PARAMETERS OF A CLASSIFIER FOR FAULT DIAGNOSIS - Particle Swarm Optimization vs Genetic Algorithms

Cosmin Danut Bocaniala, José Sa da Costa

2004

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison between the use of particle swarm optimization and the use of genetic algorithms for tuning the parameters of a novel fuzzy classifier. In previous work on the classifier, the large amount of time needed by genetic algorithms has been significantly diminished by using an optimized initial population. Even with this improvement, the time spent on tuning the parameters is still very large. The present comparison suggests that using particle swarm optimization may improve considerably the time needed for tuning the parameters. In this way, the fuzzy classifier becomes suitable for real world application. The result is validated by application to a fault diagnosis benchmark.

References

  1. Baker, E. (1978). Cluster analysis by optimal decomposition of induced fuzzy sets (PhD thesis). Delftse Universitaire Pres, Delft, Holland.
  2. Bocaniala. C.D. (2003). Tehnici de inteligenta artificiala aplicate în diagnoza defectelor: Aplicatii ale tehnicilor de clasificare (Technical Research Report within doctoral training). University “Dunarea de Jos” of Galati, Romania. (available in English for download at http://www.gcar.dem.ist.utl.pt/Pessoal/Cosmin/publica t.htm)
  3. Bocaniala, C.D., J. Sa da Costa and R. Louro (2003). A Fuzzy Classification Solution for Fault Diagnosis of Valve Actuators. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, Oxford, UK, September 3-5, Part I, pp. 741-747. LNAI Series, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
  4. Bocaniala, C. D., J. Sa da Costa and V. Palade (2004). A Novel Fuzzy Classification Solution for Fault Diagnosis, International Journal of Fuzzy and Intelligent Systems. (accepted)
  5. Boudaoud, N. and M. Masson (2000). Diagnosis of transient states using pattern recognition approach. JESA - European Journal of Automation, 34, 689-708.
  6. Calado, J. M. G., J. Korbicz, K. Patan, R. Patton and J. M. G. Sa da Costa (2001). Soft Computing Approaches to Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems. European Journal of Control, 7, 248-286.
  7. Chen, J. and R. J. Patton (1999). Robust Model-Based Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems. Asian Studies in Computer Science and Information Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA.
  8. European Community's FP5, Research Training Network DAMADICS Project, http://www.eng. hull.ac.uk/research/control/damadics1.htm.
  9. Frank, P.M. (1996). Analytical and qualitative modelbased fault diagnosis - a survey and some new results. European Journal of Control, 2, 6-28.
  10. Heppner, F. and Grenander U. (1990). A stochastic nonlinear model for coordinated bird flocks. In: The Ubiquity of Chaos, AAAS Publications, Washington, DC.
  11. Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R. (1995). Particle Swarm Optimization, In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia.
  12. Koscielny, J.M., M. Syfert and M. Bartys (1999). Fuzzylogic fault diagnosis of industrial process actuators. International Journal of Applied mathematics and Computer Science, 9, 653-666.
  13. Leonhardt, S. and M. Ayoubi (1997) Methods of fault diagnosis. Control Engineering Practice, 5, 683-692.
  14. Louro, R. (2003). Fault Diagnosis of An Industrial Actuator valve (MSc dissertation). Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
  15. Palade, V., R. J. Patton, F. J. Uppal, J. Quevedo, S. Daley (2002). Fault diagnosis of an industrial gas turbine using neuro-fuzzy methods. In: Preprints of the 15th IFAC World Congress, Barcelona, Spain,CD-ROM.
  16. Sá da Costa, J. and R. Louro (2003). Modelling and simulation of an industrial actuator valve for fault diagnosis benchmark. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Mathematical Modelling, Vienna, Austria.
  17. Weisstein, E.W. (1999). Correlation Coefficient. From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CorrelationCoefficient. html
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Bocaniala C. and Costa J. (2004). TUNING THE PARAMETERS OF A CLASSIFIER FOR FAULT DIAGNOSIS - Particle Swarm Optimization vs Genetic Algorithms . In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 1: ICINCO, ISBN 972-8865-12-0, pages 157-162. DOI: 10.5220/0001143801570162


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icinco04,
author={Cosmin Danut Bocaniala and José Sa da Costa},
title={TUNING THE PARAMETERS OF A CLASSIFIER FOR FAULT DIAGNOSIS - Particle Swarm Optimization vs Genetic Algorithms},
booktitle={Proceedings of the First International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 1: ICINCO,},
year={2004},
pages={157-162},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0001143801570162},
isbn={972-8865-12-0},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the First International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 1: ICINCO,
TI - TUNING THE PARAMETERS OF A CLASSIFIER FOR FAULT DIAGNOSIS - Particle Swarm Optimization vs Genetic Algorithms
SN - 972-8865-12-0
AU - Bocaniala C.
AU - Costa J.
PY - 2004
SP - 157
EP - 162
DO - 10.5220/0001143801570162