A comparison of UML and OWL in the travel domain

Jennifer Sampson

Research.Publish.Connect.

*Please fill out at least one Field. *Value must be an number!

Title:
ISBN:
Year:
Acronym:
Subject:

Advanced Search Proceedings Search

If you're looking for an exact phrase use quotation marks on text fields.

*Please fill out at least one Field.

Title:
Author:
Affiliation:
Subject:

Advanced Search Papers Search

If you're looking for an exact phrase use quotation marks on text fields.

*Please fill out at least one Field.

Name:
Affiliation:
Country:
Conference:
Subject:

Advanced Search Authors Search

If you're looking for an exact phrase use quotation marks on text fields.

*Please fill out at least one Field.

Name:
Country:
Subject:

Advanced Search Affiliations Search

If you're looking for an exact phrase use quotation marks on text fields.

Proceedings

Proceedings Search *Please fill out at least one Field. *Value must be an number!

Title:
ISBN:
Year:
Acronym:
Subject:

Advanced Search Proceedings Search

If you're looking for an exact phrase use quotation marks on text fields.

Papers

Papers Search *Please fill out at least one Field.

Title:
Author:
Affiliation:
Subject:

Advanced Search Papers Search

If you're looking for an exact phrase use quotation marks on text fields.

Authors

Authors Search *Please fill out at least one Field.

Name:
Affiliation:
Country:
Conference:
Subject:

Advanced Search Authors Search

If you're looking for an exact phrase use quotation marks on text fields.

Advanced Search

Paper

A comparison of UML and OWL in the travel domain

In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Web Services: Modeling, Architecture and Infrastructure - Volume 0ICEIS, 36-48, 2004 , Porto, Portugal

Author: Jennifer Sampson

Affiliation: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

Abstract: Recent research has focused towards determining the efficacy of using UML as an ontology modelling language [6, 7, 8, 12]. In this paper we compare the use of UML with the Web Ontology Language – OWL for modelling the travel domain. One conclusion resulting from this study is that OWL and UML were devised with different motivations, and for supporting different types of application domains. Owl benefits from a solid theoretical basis in description logic, which means it has a well defined semantics, formal properties are well understood, and there are known reasoning algorithms and implementations of the language. In addition to the model comparison we propose an ontology quality framework. The quality framework is one step towards defining quality measures for ontology modelling.

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

SciTePress user: please login.

My Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 3.138.113.188

In the current month:

Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total

2⁺ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:

Sampson, J. (2004). A comparison of UML and OWL in the travel domain. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Web Services: Modeling, Architecture and Infrastructure (ICEIS 2004) - WSMAI; ISBN 972-8865-09-0, SciTePress, pages 36-48. DOI: 10.5220/0002678300360048

@conference{wsmai04,
author={Jennifer Sampson.},
title={A comparison of UML and OWL in the travel domain},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Web Services: Modeling, Architecture and Infrastructure (ICEIS 2004) - WSMAI},
year={2004},
pages={36-48},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002678300360048},
isbn={972-8865-09-0},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Web Services: Modeling, Architecture and Infrastructure (ICEIS 2004) - WSMAI
TI - A comparison of UML and OWL in the travel domain
SN - 972-8865-09-0
AU - Sampson, J.
PY - 2004
SP - 36
EP - 48
DO - 10.5220/0002678300360048
PB - SciTePress