loading
Papers Papers/2022 Papers Papers/2022

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Paper Unlock

Authors: Katrin Arning 1 ; Barbara Sophie Zaunbrecher 1 ; Maximilian Borning 2 ; Niklas van Bracht 2 ; Martina Ziefle 1 and Albert Moser 2

Affiliations: 1 Human-Computer Interaction Center, Chair of Communication Science, RWTH Aachen University, Campus Boulevard 57, 52074 Aachen and Germany ; 2 Chair and Institute of Power Systems and Power Economics, RWTH Aachen University, Schinkelstraße 6 and 52062 Aachen

Keyword(s): Alternative Fuel, Production Infrastructure, Power System Design, Public Acceptance, Conjoint Analysis.

Related Ontology Subjects/Areas/Topics: Architectures for Smart Grids ; Energy and Economy ; Energy-Aware Systems and Technologies ; Greener Systems Planning and Design ; Renewable Energy Resources ; Smart Grids

Abstract: The substitution of fossil fuels by alternative fuels (AF) is a promising approach to achieve climate protection goals. Since the production of AF places considerable demands on the existing power system, planning processes also have to consider the energy demand and supply of AF production plants. Apart from these technical requirements, the acceptability of new AF production plants and their power supply infrastructure also needs to be considered. An empirical study (n = 313, carried out 2018 in Germany) based on the conjoint measurement approach was conducted, which investigated the impact of acceptance-relevant criteria on preferences for infrastructure scenarios for AF production plants. Emissions of an AF production plant had the highest impact on preferences, followed by the electricity mix, where surplus and renewables were preferred as energy sources. Compensatory measures, especially price reductions for AF, and the application field of AF were of minor relevance for prefer ence decisions. The size of AF production plants was also not relevant for scenario preferences, at least on an abstract meta-level of planning scenarios. Based on the results, the integration of acceptance as soft factor into power system planning processes is discussed and recommendations for future planning processes and -deployment activities for acceptable AF production infrastructure are derived. (More)

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 3.144.26.83

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Arning, K.; Zaunbrecher, B.; Borning, M.; van Bracht, N.; Ziefle, M. and Moser, A. (2019). Does Size Matter? Investigating Laypeoples’ Preferences for Roll-out Scenarios of Alternative Fuel Production Plants. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems - SMARTGREENS; ISBN 978-989-758-373-5; ISSN 2184-4968, SciTePress, pages 91-99. DOI: 10.5220/0007697100910099

@conference{smartgreens19,
author={Katrin Arning. and Barbara Sophie Zaunbrecher. and Maximilian Borning. and Niklas {van Bracht}. and Martina Ziefle. and Albert Moser.},
title={Does Size Matter? Investigating Laypeoples’ Preferences for Roll-out Scenarios of Alternative Fuel Production Plants},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems - SMARTGREENS},
year={2019},
pages={91-99},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0007697100910099},
isbn={978-989-758-373-5},
issn={2184-4968},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems - SMARTGREENS
TI - Does Size Matter? Investigating Laypeoples’ Preferences for Roll-out Scenarios of Alternative Fuel Production Plants
SN - 978-989-758-373-5
IS - 2184-4968
AU - Arning, K.
AU - Zaunbrecher, B.
AU - Borning, M.
AU - van Bracht, N.
AU - Ziefle, M.
AU - Moser, A.
PY - 2019
SP - 91
EP - 99
DO - 10.5220/0007697100910099
PB - SciTePress