loading
Papers Papers/2022 Papers Papers/2022

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Paper Unlock
Rate Your Mate for Food for Thought: Elsewhere Use a Grader

Topics: Assessment and Accreditation of Courses and Institutions; Authoring Tools and Content Development; Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning; e-Learning Platforms, Portals; Flipped Classroom; Instructional Design; Mentoring and Tutoring; Metrics and Performance Measurement; Project Based Learning and Engineering Education; Tools for Educational Communication and Collaboration; Tools to Assess Learning

Authors: Pia Niemelä and Mikko Nurminen

Affiliation: Tampere Universities, PO Box 527, FI-33101, Tampere, Finland

Keyword(s): Tools to Assess Learning, Instructional Design, Mentoring and Tutoring, Metrics and Performance Measurement, Project based Learning, Engineering Education, Flipped Classroom.

Abstract: Finnish university pedagogues are keen on applying flipped learning techniques to improve education and learning outcomes. Flipped learning implies the transfer of assessment in a more formative direction and targeted feedback that is frequently delivered. On the contrary, teaching resources are decreasing. Increasing the portion of self-, peer- and automatic assessment partially helps solving this dilemma. Currently, Tampere University is in the midst of the process of combining two separate campuses together. Both campuses offer major-specific computer science studies. This paper presents a case study of merging basic level web technology courses, and in particular their different assessment practices together. The courses are targeted for the second- and third-year students, and the number of participants is about 200 in the studied course (enrolled N=324 / completed N=178). The merged course was run in two learning management systems (LMSs), called Plussa and WETO. The switch fro m one LMS to another happened in the middle of the course. LMSs employed different assessment practices for weekly exercises: Plussa assessed them automatically, whereas WETO exploited peer-reviews. This provided a unique opportunity to compare these two assessment methods and the study addresses the pedagogical opportunities and challenges of both. (More)

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 54.89.127.249

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Niemelä, P. and Nurminen, M. (2020). Rate Your Mate for Food for Thought: Elsewhere Use a Grader. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU; ISBN 978-989-758-417-6; ISSN 2184-5026, SciTePress, pages 422-429. DOI: 10.5220/0009564204220429

@conference{csedu20,
author={Pia Niemelä. and Mikko Nurminen.},
title={Rate Your Mate for Food for Thought: Elsewhere Use a Grader},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU},
year={2020},
pages={422-429},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0009564204220429},
isbn={978-989-758-417-6},
issn={2184-5026},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU
TI - Rate Your Mate for Food for Thought: Elsewhere Use a Grader
SN - 978-989-758-417-6
IS - 2184-5026
AU - Niemelä, P.
AU - Nurminen, M.
PY - 2020
SP - 422
EP - 429
DO - 10.5220/0009564204220429
PB - SciTePress