Papers Papers/2020



Paper Unlock

Authors: Ivonne Schröter 1 ; Jacob Krüger 2 ; Philipp Ludwig 3 ; Marcus Thiel 3 ; Andreas Nürnberger 3 and Thomas Leich 4

Affiliations: 1 Otto-von-Guericke-University and METOP GmbH, Germany ; 2 Otto-von-Guericke-University and Harz University of Applied Sciences, Germany ; 3 Otto-von-Guericke-University, Germany ; 4 METOP GmbH and Harz University of Applied Sciences, Germany

ISBN: 978-989-758-247-9

ISSN: 2184-4992

Keyword(s): Enterprise Information System, Empirical Study, Survey, User Questionnaire, Requirements Engineering.

Related Ontology Subjects/Areas/Topics: Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support Systems ; Biomedical Engineering ; Data Engineering ; Enterprise Information Systems ; Health Information Systems ; Information Systems Analysis and Specification ; Knowledge Management ; Ontologies and the Semantic Web ; Operational Research ; Society, e-Business and e-Government ; Strategic Decision Support Systems ; Web Information Systems and Technologies

Abstract: The number of new research documents and patents published each year is steadily increasing. Despite this development, identifying innovative documents in a timely manner has received only little attention in research. Nevertheless, this use case is important for companies that strive to keep up with current innovations in their field. However, since existing solutions do not take context and background of the particular firm or researcher into account, they fall short in supporting the user in his search for suitable documents. In this paper, we describe an industrial case study we conducted within sheet-metal working companies and related research institutes in Germany. We i) report a qualitative study on innovation research, ii) provide a list of features that industrial researchers demanded, and iii) discuss implementation challenges for systems that support interactive retrieval of innovative documents. Based on the initial results, we argue that existing systems fall sh ort to provide an integrated workflow. Overall, we discuss how to implement such a system and the corresponding problems. (More)


Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Schröter, I.; Krüger, J.; Ludwig, P.; Thiel, M.; Nürnberger, A. and Leich, T. (2017). Identifying Innovative Documents: Quo vadis?. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-758-247-9; ISSN 2184-4992, pages 653-658. DOI: 10.5220/0006368706530658

author={Ivonne Schröter. and Jacob Krüger. and Philipp Ludwig. and Marcus Thiel. and Andreas Nürnberger. and Thomas Leich.},
title={Identifying Innovative Documents: Quo vadis?},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},


JO - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - Identifying Innovative Documents: Quo vadis?
SN - 978-989-758-247-9
IS - 2184-4992
AU - Schröter, I.
AU - Krüger, J.
AU - Ludwig, P.
AU - Thiel, M.
AU - Nürnberger, A.
AU - Leich, T.
PY - 2017
SP - 653
EP - 658
DO - 10.5220/0006368706530658

Login or register to post comments.

Comments on this Paper: Be the first to review this paper.