loading
Papers

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Paper Unlock

Authors: Dimos Triantis ; Errikos Ventouras ; Ioanna Leraki ; Charalampos Stergiopoulos ; Ilias Stavrakas and George Hloupis

Affiliation: Technological Educational Institute of Athens, Greece

ISBN: 978-989-758-020-8

Keyword(s): Assessment Methodologies, Computer-aided Examination Methods, Evaluation Algorithms, Undergraduate Engineering Modules, Scoring Rules, Multiple Choice Questions, Constructed Response Questions.

Related Ontology Subjects/Areas/Topics: Computer-Aided Assessment ; Computer-Supported Education ; Engineering Education and Ethics ; Groupware Tools ; Information Technologies Supporting Learning ; Learning/Teaching Methodologies and Assessment ; Metrics and Performance Measurement ; Social Context and Learning Environments

Abstract: The aim of this work is the comparison of two well-known examination methods, the first consisted of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and the second based on constructed-response questions (CRQs). During this research MCQ and CRQ tests were created for examining the undergraduate engineering module of “project management” and were given to a group of students. Computers and a special software package were used to support the process. During the first part the examinees had to answer a set of CRQs. Afterwards, they had to answer a set of MCQs. Both sets covered the same topics and had the same level of difficulty. The second method (MCQs) is more objective in terms of grading, though it may conceal an error in the final formulation of the score when a student gives an answer based on an instinctive feeling. To eliminate this problem a set of MCQs pairs was composed taking care that each question of the pair addressed the same topic in a way that the similarity would not be evident to a student who did not possess adequate knowledge. By applying a suitable scoring rule to the MCQs, very similar results are obtained when comparing these two examination methods. (More)

PDF ImageFull Text

Download
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 34.237.51.159

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Triantis, D.; Ventouras, E.; Leraki, I.; Stergiopoulos, C.; Stavrakas, I. and Hloupis, G. (2014). Comparing Electronic Examination Methods for Assessing Engineering Students - The Case of Multiple-Choice Questions and Constructed Response Questions.In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-020-8, pages 126-132. DOI: 10.5220/0004848401260132

@conference{csedu14,
author={Dimos Triantis. and Errikos Ventouras. and Ioanna Leraki. and Charalampos Stergiopoulos. and Ilias Stavrakas. and George Hloupis.},
title={Comparing Electronic Examination Methods for Assessing Engineering Students - The Case of Multiple-Choice Questions and Constructed Response Questions},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,},
year={2014},
pages={126-132},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004848401260132},
isbn={978-989-758-020-8},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,
TI - Comparing Electronic Examination Methods for Assessing Engineering Students - The Case of Multiple-Choice Questions and Constructed Response Questions
SN - 978-989-758-020-8
AU - Triantis, D.
AU - Ventouras, E.
AU - Leraki, I.
AU - Stergiopoulos, C.
AU - Stavrakas, I.
AU - Hloupis, G.
PY - 2014
SP - 126
EP - 132
DO - 10.5220/0004848401260132

Login or register to post comments.

Comments on this Paper: Be the first to review this paper.