A Comparison of Two Business Rules Engineering Approaches

Lex Wedemeijer

Research.Publish.Connect.

*Please fill out at least one Field. *Value must be an number!

Title:
ISBN:
Year:
Acronym:
Subject:

Advanced Search Proceedings Search

If you're looking for an exact phrase use quotation marks on text fields.

*Please fill out at least one Field.

Title:
Author:
Affiliation:
Subject:

Advanced Search Papers Search

If you're looking for an exact phrase use quotation marks on text fields.

*Please fill out at least one Field.

Name:
Affiliation:
Country:
Conference:
Subject:

Advanced Search Authors Search

If you're looking for an exact phrase use quotation marks on text fields.

*Please fill out at least one Field.

Name:
Country:
Subject:

Advanced Search Affiliations Search

If you're looking for an exact phrase use quotation marks on text fields.

Proceedings

Proceedings Search *Please fill out at least one Field. *Value must be an number!

Title:
ISBN:
Year:
Acronym:
Subject:

Advanced Search Proceedings Search

If you're looking for an exact phrase use quotation marks on text fields.

Papers

Papers Search *Please fill out at least one Field.

Title:
Author:
Affiliation:
Subject:

Advanced Search Papers Search

If you're looking for an exact phrase use quotation marks on text fields.

Authors

Authors Search *Please fill out at least one Field.

Name:
Affiliation:
Country:
Conference:
Subject:

Advanced Search Authors Search

If you're looking for an exact phrase use quotation marks on text fields.

Advanced Search

Paper

A Comparison of Two Business Rules Engineering Approaches

In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design BMSD - Volume 1, 113-121, 2012 , Geneva, Switzerland

Author: Lex Wedemeijer

Affiliation: Open University of the Netherlands, Netherlands

Keyword(s): Business Rules, Requirements Engineering, Aspect Oriented Modelling, Modelscope, Relation Algebra, Ampersand.

Abstract: We compare two contemporary approaches under development for business rules engineering with the aim to understand their coverage of business rules and their potentials for requirements engineering. One appro¬ach, Aspect Oriented Modeling, focuses on events, state transitions and the synchronization of transitions between objects. The other approach, Ampersand, focuses on invariant rules that should be complied with regardless of the business events taking place. Our comparison brings out that either method can adequately capture some types of business rule, but not others. We conclude that a combination of the two approaches may be a significant contribution to the methods and tools for business rules engineering currently available.

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

SciTePress user: please login.

My Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 18.218.254.122

In the current month:

Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total

2⁺ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:

Wedemeijer, L. (2012). A Comparison of Two Business Rules Engineering Approaches. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design - BMSD; ISBN 978-989-8565-26-6, SciTePress, pages 113-121. DOI: 10.5220/0004461701130121

@conference{bmsd12,
author={Lex Wedemeijer.},
title={A Comparison of Two Business Rules Engineering Approaches},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design - BMSD},
year={2012},
pages={113-121},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004461701130121},
isbn={978-989-8565-26-6},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design - BMSD
TI - A Comparison of Two Business Rules Engineering Approaches
SN - 978-989-8565-26-6
AU - Wedemeijer, L.
PY - 2012
SP - 113
EP - 121
DO - 10.5220/0004461701130121
PB - SciTePress